Combined use of dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Guo-Guang Zhao, Chao Lou, Rong-Lei Gao, Fu-Xing Lei, Jing Zhao
{"title":"Combined use of dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer","authors":"Guo-Guang Zhao, Chao Lou, Rong-Lei Gao, Fu-Xing Lei, Jing Zhao","doi":"10.4251/wjgo.v16.i7.2952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Radical laparoscopic gastrectomy is an important treatment modality for gastric cancer. Surgery requires general anesthesia, and patients are susceptible to the effects of anesthetic drugs and carbon dioxide insufflation during the procedure, leading to inflammation or severe pain, which can affect patient outcome.\n AIM\n To explore the efficacy of combining dexmedetomidine (DEX) with nalbuphine in patients underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.\n METHODS\n Patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic radical gastrectomy were selected and randomly assigned to A or B group. In A group, patients received an intravenous injection of nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg + DEX 0.4 μg/kg 10 min before the end of surgery; in B group, patients received only an intravenous injection of nalbuphine. The trends in hemodynamic parameter fluctuations, awakening quality during the recovery period, serum inflammatory markers, agitation scores, cough severity, incidence, and duration of postoperative delirium (POD) were compared.\n RESULTS\n The mean arterial pressure and heart rate in the A group were more stable (P < 0.05). The A group had a lower average awakening time, extubation time, and agitation scores during recovery than the B group. Agitation control in the A group was more effective at different time points (P < 0.05). Patients in the A group had lower serum interleukin (IL)-6, tumour necrosis factor alpha, and IL-10 levels at 1 h after surgery than the B group. The incidence of coughing and duration of POD were lower and shorter in the A group than in the B group. Adverse reactions caused by the two anesthesia methods were less frequent in the A group than in the B group (P < 0.05).\n CONCLUSION\n The use of DEX and nalbuphine in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer help reducing the inflammatory response, cough severity, and agitation and helps maintain hemodynamic stability.","PeriodicalId":23762,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i7.2952","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Radical laparoscopic gastrectomy is an important treatment modality for gastric cancer. Surgery requires general anesthesia, and patients are susceptible to the effects of anesthetic drugs and carbon dioxide insufflation during the procedure, leading to inflammation or severe pain, which can affect patient outcome. AIM To explore the efficacy of combining dexmedetomidine (DEX) with nalbuphine in patients underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS Patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic radical gastrectomy were selected and randomly assigned to A or B group. In A group, patients received an intravenous injection of nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg + DEX 0.4 μg/kg 10 min before the end of surgery; in B group, patients received only an intravenous injection of nalbuphine. The trends in hemodynamic parameter fluctuations, awakening quality during the recovery period, serum inflammatory markers, agitation scores, cough severity, incidence, and duration of postoperative delirium (POD) were compared. RESULTS The mean arterial pressure and heart rate in the A group were more stable (P < 0.05). The A group had a lower average awakening time, extubation time, and agitation scores during recovery than the B group. Agitation control in the A group was more effective at different time points (P < 0.05). Patients in the A group had lower serum interleukin (IL)-6, tumour necrosis factor alpha, and IL-10 levels at 1 h after surgery than the B group. The incidence of coughing and duration of POD were lower and shorter in the A group than in the B group. Adverse reactions caused by the two anesthesia methods were less frequent in the A group than in the B group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The use of DEX and nalbuphine in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer help reducing the inflammatory response, cough severity, and agitation and helps maintain hemodynamic stability.
在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中联合使用右美托咪定和纳布啡
背景:腹腔镜胃癌根治术是治疗胃癌的重要方法。手术需要全身麻醉,患者在手术过程中容易受到麻醉药物和二氧化碳充气的影响,导致炎症或剧烈疼痛,从而影响患者的预后。目的 探讨右美托咪定(DEX)与纳布啡联合使用对腹腔镜胃癌根治术患者的疗效。方法 选择计划接受腹腔镜胃癌根治术的患者,并将其随机分配到 A 组或 B 组。A 组患者在手术结束前 10 分钟静脉注射纳布啡 0.2 mg/kg+DEX 0.4 μg/kg;B 组患者仅静脉注射纳布啡。比较血流动力学参数波动趋势、恢复期苏醒质量、血清炎症指标、躁动评分、咳嗽严重程度、术后谵妄(POD)发生率和持续时间。结果 A 组的平均动脉压和心率更稳定(P < 0.05)。A 组的平均苏醒时间、拔管时间和恢复期躁动评分均低于 B 组。在不同的时间点,A 组的躁动控制更有效(P < 0.05)。A 组患者术后 1 小时的血清白细胞介素(IL)-6、肿瘤坏死因子α和 IL-10 水平低于 B 组。与 B 组相比,A 组患者的咳嗽发生率和 POD 持续时间更低且更短。两种麻醉方法引起的不良反应在 A 组的发生率低于 B 组(P < 0.05)。结论 在接受腹腔镜胃癌根治术的患者中使用 DEX 和纳布啡有助于减轻炎症反应、咳嗽严重程度和躁动,并有助于维持血流动力学稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
1082
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology (WJGO) is a leading academic journal devoted to reporting the latest, cutting-edge research progress and findings of basic research and clinical practice in the field of gastrointestinal oncology.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信