Keeping the time: the impact of external clock-speed manipulation on time-based prospective memory

IF 2.3 Q1 Psychology
G. Laera, G. Mioni, Sandrine Vanneste, P. Bisiacchi, A. Hering, Matthias Kliegel
{"title":"Keeping the time: the impact of external clock-speed manipulation on time-based prospective memory","authors":"G. Laera, G. Mioni, Sandrine Vanneste, P. Bisiacchi, A. Hering, Matthias Kliegel","doi":"10.5334/joc.388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies have suggested that time monitoring is important for appropriate time-based prospective memory (TBPM). However, it is still unknown if people actively use internal timing processes to monitor the approaching target time, and whether they do so by tracking the duration between clock digits, or by counting and matching the numerical progression of clock ticks' digits with the target time. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated whether a manipulation of the external time affected time monitoring and TBPM performance. In two experiments, participants performed two identical TBPM tasks: a first TBPM block with no clock-speed manipulation followed by a second TBPM block, where the clock-speed was manipulated as faster or slower (experimental conditions) or normal (control condition). The results showed that only participants in the slower clock condition increased time monitoring in the second compared to the first TBPM block (d = 0.42 and 1.70); moreover, particularly in Experiment 2, participants in the faster clock condition checked the clock significantly less frequently than participants in the slower clock (d = -1.70) and in the control condition (d = -0.98), but only during the 4th minute. No effect was found for TBPM performance. Overall, results suggested that people tracked the target time by counting and matching the numerical progression of clock ticks' digits with the target time. The findings are discussed considering the most recent theoretical advancements about the relationship between time perception and TBPM.","PeriodicalId":32728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition","volume":"60 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies have suggested that time monitoring is important for appropriate time-based prospective memory (TBPM). However, it is still unknown if people actively use internal timing processes to monitor the approaching target time, and whether they do so by tracking the duration between clock digits, or by counting and matching the numerical progression of clock ticks' digits with the target time. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated whether a manipulation of the external time affected time monitoring and TBPM performance. In two experiments, participants performed two identical TBPM tasks: a first TBPM block with no clock-speed manipulation followed by a second TBPM block, where the clock-speed was manipulated as faster or slower (experimental conditions) or normal (control condition). The results showed that only participants in the slower clock condition increased time monitoring in the second compared to the first TBPM block (d = 0.42 and 1.70); moreover, particularly in Experiment 2, participants in the faster clock condition checked the clock significantly less frequently than participants in the slower clock (d = -1.70) and in the control condition (d = -0.98), but only during the 4th minute. No effect was found for TBPM performance. Overall, results suggested that people tracked the target time by counting and matching the numerical progression of clock ticks' digits with the target time. The findings are discussed considering the most recent theoretical advancements about the relationship between time perception and TBPM.
把握时间:外部时钟速度操作对基于时间的前瞻性记忆的影响
一些研究表明,时间监控对于适当的时基前瞻记忆(TBPM)非常重要。然而,人们是否会主动使用内部计时过程来监控目标时间的临近,以及他们是通过追踪时钟数字之间的持续时间,还是通过计数并将时钟滴答声的数字进展与目标时间相匹配来实现这一目的,目前仍不得而知。因此,在本研究中,我们探讨了外部时间的操控是否会影响时间监控和 TBPM 的表现。在两个实验中,参与者分别完成了两项相同的 TBPM 任务:第一项 TBPM 任务未对时钟速度进行任何操作,第二项 TBPM 任务则对时钟速度进行了快慢操作(实验条件)或正常操作(对照条件)。结果显示,与第一个 TBPM 块相比,只有时钟较慢条件下的参与者在第二个 TBPM 块中增加了时间监控(d = 0.42 和 1.70);此外,特别是在实验 2 中,时钟较快条件下的参与者检查时钟的频率明显低于时钟较慢条件下的参与者(d =-1.70)和对照条件下的参与者(d =-0.98),但仅限于第 4 分钟。在 TBPM 成绩方面没有发现任何影响。总之,研究结果表明,人们是通过计数并将时钟滴答声的数字进程与目标时间相匹配来追踪目标时间的。考虑到时间感知与 TBPM 之间关系的最新理论进展,我们对研究结果进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognition
Journal of Cognition Psychology-Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信