Evaluating the Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Symptom Relief and Cognitive Function in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder, Substance Use Disorder, and Depression: An Insight from a Naturalistic Observational Study

A. Moro, Daniele Saccenti, A. Vergallito, Regina Gregori Grgič, Silvia Grazioli, Novella Pretti, Sofia Crespi, Antonio Malgaroli, Simona Scaini, G. Ruggiero, S. Sassaroli, Mattia Ferro, J. Lamanna
{"title":"Evaluating the Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Symptom Relief and Cognitive Function in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder, Substance Use Disorder, and Depression: An Insight from a Naturalistic Observational Study","authors":"A. Moro, Daniele Saccenti, A. Vergallito, Regina Gregori Grgič, Silvia Grazioli, Novella Pretti, Sofia Crespi, Antonio Malgaroli, Simona Scaini, G. Ruggiero, S. Sassaroli, Mattia Ferro, J. Lamanna","doi":"10.3390/app14146178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The utilization of non-invasive neurostimulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is increasingly prevalent in psychiatry due to their efficacy and safety. Although the precise therapeutic mechanisms remain partially unclear, repetitive TMS, particularly high-frequency stimulation, may enhance cognitive functions, contributing to therapeutic benefits. This within-subjects study examined the impact of TMS on cognitive and symptomatic outcomes in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), substance use disorder (SUD), and major depressive disorder (MDD). A total of 44 patients underwent cognitive tests and symptom assessments before and after an intensive four-week TMS treatment phase, followed by a four-week maintenance phase. Cognitive assessments included Raven’s matrices, verbal fluency, and digit span tests, while symptom severity was measured using the Italian version of the SCL-90-R. Decision-making performance was also evaluated by administering a delay discounting (DD) test. Principal component analysis was used to generate a dimensional characterization of subjects along cognitive and symptom-related axes before and after treatment. The results indicated that TMS significantly improved symptom scores, but no significant cognitive enhancement was observed. Statistical analysis based on linear mixed-effects models confirmed these findings, showing a significant fixed effect of TMS treatment on symptoms but not on cognitive performance. DD metrics remained unchanged. These findings suggest that while TMS effectively alleviates clinical symptoms, it does not produce consistent or appreciable enhancement of cognitive functions in these protocols. This study highlights the need for more personalized and combined therapeutic approaches to maximize the benefits of TMS, potentially incorporating cognitive enhancement strategies. Future studies will be useful to explore whether the results we obtained are valid for other pathologies, cognitive tests, and stimulation protocols.","PeriodicalId":502388,"journal":{"name":"Applied Sciences","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The utilization of non-invasive neurostimulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is increasingly prevalent in psychiatry due to their efficacy and safety. Although the precise therapeutic mechanisms remain partially unclear, repetitive TMS, particularly high-frequency stimulation, may enhance cognitive functions, contributing to therapeutic benefits. This within-subjects study examined the impact of TMS on cognitive and symptomatic outcomes in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), substance use disorder (SUD), and major depressive disorder (MDD). A total of 44 patients underwent cognitive tests and symptom assessments before and after an intensive four-week TMS treatment phase, followed by a four-week maintenance phase. Cognitive assessments included Raven’s matrices, verbal fluency, and digit span tests, while symptom severity was measured using the Italian version of the SCL-90-R. Decision-making performance was also evaluated by administering a delay discounting (DD) test. Principal component analysis was used to generate a dimensional characterization of subjects along cognitive and symptom-related axes before and after treatment. The results indicated that TMS significantly improved symptom scores, but no significant cognitive enhancement was observed. Statistical analysis based on linear mixed-effects models confirmed these findings, showing a significant fixed effect of TMS treatment on symptoms but not on cognitive performance. DD metrics remained unchanged. These findings suggest that while TMS effectively alleviates clinical symptoms, it does not produce consistent or appreciable enhancement of cognitive functions in these protocols. This study highlights the need for more personalized and combined therapeutic approaches to maximize the benefits of TMS, potentially incorporating cognitive enhancement strategies. Future studies will be useful to explore whether the results we obtained are valid for other pathologies, cognitive tests, and stimulation protocols.
评估经颅磁刺激对强迫症、药物使用障碍和抑郁症患者症状缓解和认知功能的疗效:自然观察研究的启示
由于经颅磁刺激(TMS)等非侵入性神经刺激技术的有效性和安全性,其在精神病学中的应用越来越普遍。虽然确切的治疗机制尚不清楚,但重复经颅磁刺激(尤其是高频刺激)可能会增强认知功能,从而促进治疗效果。这项受试者内研究考察了 TMS 对强迫症(OCD)、药物使用障碍(SUD)和重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者的认知和症状结果的影响。共有 44 名患者在为期四周的 TMS 强化治疗阶段前后接受了认知测试和症状评估,随后又接受了为期四周的维持治疗阶段。认知评估包括瑞文矩阵、言语流畅性和数字跨度测试,而症状严重程度则使用意大利语版的 SCL-90-R 进行测量。此外,还通过延迟折现(DD)测试评估了患者的决策能力。治疗前后,研究人员使用主成分分析法对受试者的认知和症状相关轴进行了维度分析。结果表明,TMS能明显改善症状评分,但未观察到明显的认知增强。基于线性混合效应模型的统计分析证实了这些发现,显示 TMS 治疗对症状有明显的固定效应,但对认知能力没有影响。DD指标保持不变。这些研究结果表明,虽然 TMS 能有效缓解临床症状,但在这些方案中并不能持续或明显地增强认知功能。这项研究强调,需要更多个性化的综合治疗方法,以最大限度地发挥 TMS 的疗效,其中可能包括认知增强策略。未来的研究将有助于探索我们获得的结果是否适用于其他病症、认知测试和刺激方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信