IPO underpricing: a comparative analysis of risk factor disclosures in the financial and non-financial sectors

Pritpal Singh Bhullar, Krishan Lal Grover, Ranjit Tiwari
{"title":"IPO underpricing: a comparative analysis of risk factor disclosures in the financial and non-financial sectors","authors":"Pritpal Singh Bhullar, Krishan Lal Grover, Ranjit Tiwari","doi":"10.1108/bl-04-2023-0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis study aims to identify mutually exclusive risk categories and determine whether these categories effectively capture the potential impact of risk disclosures on the initial returns of initial public offerings (IPOs) in the financial and non-financial sectors.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData were collected from 131 Indian IPO prospectuses (104 non-financial and 27 financial) issued between 2015 and 2021. Content analysis was performed to identify mutually exclusive risk categories, and the effects of these categories on initial IPO returns were assessed by regression analysis\n\nFindings\nThe findings revealed that risk factor disclosures have a significant impact on underpricing, but not all risk factors are relevant. In the current study, in the financial sector, IPO underpricing was mostly driven by technological and competitive risk factors. In the non-financial sector, underpricing was predominantly influenced by operating risk and compliance risk factors.\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe limitations of this study include the use of sentence-based context analysis, which does not assess the quality of risk disclosures. The statistical data reduction technique used to generate mutually exclusive risk categories may also be a limitation.\n\nPractical implications\nThis research has the potential to assist companies in standardizing the disclosure of risks within IPO prospectuses. The insights gained can inform market regulators in designing policies aimed at aiding investors in formulating investment strategies, ultimately enhancing transparency and clarity regarding information disclosure. Moreover, the findings offer valuable guidance to investors in selecting IPOs aligned with their risk tolerance levels.\n\nSocial implications\nFrom a societal perspective, this study represents advancements by guiding regulators towards developing and regulating standardized, mutually exclusive risk factors. Such measures can aid investors in enhancing their decision-making perspectives regarding IPOs, promoting a more informed and confident investment environment.\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study is a pioneering attempt to address knowledge gaps by identifying distinct categories of risk disclosures in IPO prospectuses and examining their potential influence on IPO underpricing in the financial and non-financial sectors in India.\n","PeriodicalId":293295,"journal":{"name":"The Bottom Line","volume":"6 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bottom Line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bl-04-2023-0123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to identify mutually exclusive risk categories and determine whether these categories effectively capture the potential impact of risk disclosures on the initial returns of initial public offerings (IPOs) in the financial and non-financial sectors. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from 131 Indian IPO prospectuses (104 non-financial and 27 financial) issued between 2015 and 2021. Content analysis was performed to identify mutually exclusive risk categories, and the effects of these categories on initial IPO returns were assessed by regression analysis Findings The findings revealed that risk factor disclosures have a significant impact on underpricing, but not all risk factors are relevant. In the current study, in the financial sector, IPO underpricing was mostly driven by technological and competitive risk factors. In the non-financial sector, underpricing was predominantly influenced by operating risk and compliance risk factors. Research limitations/implications The limitations of this study include the use of sentence-based context analysis, which does not assess the quality of risk disclosures. The statistical data reduction technique used to generate mutually exclusive risk categories may also be a limitation. Practical implications This research has the potential to assist companies in standardizing the disclosure of risks within IPO prospectuses. The insights gained can inform market regulators in designing policies aimed at aiding investors in formulating investment strategies, ultimately enhancing transparency and clarity regarding information disclosure. Moreover, the findings offer valuable guidance to investors in selecting IPOs aligned with their risk tolerance levels. Social implications From a societal perspective, this study represents advancements by guiding regulators towards developing and regulating standardized, mutually exclusive risk factors. Such measures can aid investors in enhancing their decision-making perspectives regarding IPOs, promoting a more informed and confident investment environment. Originality/value This study is a pioneering attempt to address knowledge gaps by identifying distinct categories of risk disclosures in IPO prospectuses and examining their potential influence on IPO underpricing in the financial and non-financial sectors in India.
IPO 定价过低:金融和非金融行业风险因素披露的比较分析
目的本研究旨在确定相互排斥的风险类别,并确定这些类别是否能有效捕捉到风险披露对金融和非金融行业首次公开募股(IPO)初始回报的潜在影响。数据收集自 2015 年至 2021 年间发布的 131 份印度 IPO 招股说明书(104 份非金融类和 27 份金融类)。通过内容分析确定了相互排斥的风险类别,并通过回归分析评估了这些类别对首次公开募股初始回报的影响。研究结果表明,风险因素披露对定价过低有显著影响,但并非所有风险因素都是相关的。在本次研究中,金融行业的 IPO 定价偏低主要是由技术和竞争风险因素造成的。在非金融行业,定价偏低主要受经营风险和合规风险因素的影响。研究局限性/启示本研究的局限性包括使用基于句子的上下文分析法,该方法不能评估风险披露的质量。本研究有可能帮助公司规范首次公开招股说明书中的风险披露。所获得的洞察力可为市场监管者设计旨在帮助投资者制定投资策略的政策提供参考,最终提高信息披露的透明度和清晰度。社会影响从社会角度看,本研究通过指导监管机构制定和监管标准化的、相互排斥的风险因素,代表了一种进步。原创性/价值本研究是一项开创性的尝试,通过识别 IPO 招股说明书中不同类别的风险披露并研究其对印度金融和非金融行业 IPO 定价过低的潜在影响,填补了知识空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信