Predictive value of intracranial high-density areas in neurological function

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Zhi-Juan Lu, Jin-Xing Lai, Jing-Ru Huang, Shu-Hua Xie, Zhao-Hui Lai
{"title":"Predictive value of intracranial high-density areas in neurological function","authors":"Zhi-Juan Lu, Jin-Xing Lai, Jing-Ru Huang, Shu-Hua Xie, Zhao-Hui Lai","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v14.i7.1080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Intracranial high-density areas (HDAs) have attracted considerable attention for predicting clinical outcomes; however, whether HDAs predict worse neurological function and mental health remains controversial and unclear, which requires further investigation.\n AIM\n To investigate the predictive value of intracranial HDAs for neurological function and mental health after endovascular treatment.\n METHODS\n In this prospective study, 96 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who accepted endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EMT) were included. The enrolled patients underwent cranial computed tomography (CT) examination within 24 hours after EMT. Clinical data in terms of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores were collected and compared between patients with HDAs and non-HDAs and between patients with good and poor clinical prognosis.\n RESULTS\n Compared to patients without HDAs, patients with HDAs presented severe neurological deficits (admission NIHSS score: 18 ± 3 vs 19 ± 4), were more likely to have post-stroke disabilities (mRS < 3: 35% vs 62%), and suffered more severe depression (SDS score: 58 ± 16 vs 64 ± 13) and anxiety disorder (SAS score: 52 ± 8 vs 59 ± 10). Compared to patients with a good prognosis, patients with a poor prognosis presented severe neurological deficits (admission NIHSS score: 17 ± 4 vs 20 ± 3), were more likely to have HDAs on CT images (64% vs 33%), and suffered more severe depression (SDS score: 55 ± 19 vs 65 ± 11) and anxiety (SAS score: 50 ± 8 vs 58 ± 12). Multivariate analysis revealed that HDAs were independent negative prognostic factors.\n CONCLUSION\n In conclusion, HDAs on CT images predicted poor prognosis and severe depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with AIS who underwent EMT.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i7.1080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Intracranial high-density areas (HDAs) have attracted considerable attention for predicting clinical outcomes; however, whether HDAs predict worse neurological function and mental health remains controversial and unclear, which requires further investigation. AIM To investigate the predictive value of intracranial HDAs for neurological function and mental health after endovascular treatment. METHODS In this prospective study, 96 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who accepted endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EMT) were included. The enrolled patients underwent cranial computed tomography (CT) examination within 24 hours after EMT. Clinical data in terms of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores were collected and compared between patients with HDAs and non-HDAs and between patients with good and poor clinical prognosis. RESULTS Compared to patients without HDAs, patients with HDAs presented severe neurological deficits (admission NIHSS score: 18 ± 3 vs 19 ± 4), were more likely to have post-stroke disabilities (mRS < 3: 35% vs 62%), and suffered more severe depression (SDS score: 58 ± 16 vs 64 ± 13) and anxiety disorder (SAS score: 52 ± 8 vs 59 ± 10). Compared to patients with a good prognosis, patients with a poor prognosis presented severe neurological deficits (admission NIHSS score: 17 ± 4 vs 20 ± 3), were more likely to have HDAs on CT images (64% vs 33%), and suffered more severe depression (SDS score: 55 ± 19 vs 65 ± 11) and anxiety (SAS score: 50 ± 8 vs 58 ± 12). Multivariate analysis revealed that HDAs were independent negative prognostic factors. CONCLUSION In conclusion, HDAs on CT images predicted poor prognosis and severe depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with AIS who underwent EMT.
颅内高密度区对神经功能的预测价值
背景 颅内高密度区(HDAs)在预测临床结果方面引起了广泛关注;然而,HDAs 是否能预测神经功能和精神健康状况的恶化仍存在争议且不明确,需要进一步研究。目的 探讨颅内 HDA 对血管内治疗后神经功能和心理健康的预测价值。方法 在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了 96 名接受血管内机械取栓术(EMT)的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者。患者在接受 EMT 治疗后 24 小时内接受了头颅计算机断层扫描(CT)检查。收集美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、3 个月改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分等临床数据,并对 HDA 患者和非 HDA 患者以及临床预后良好和不良的患者进行比较。结果 与非 HDAs 患者相比,HDAs 患者表现出严重的神经功能缺损(入院 NIHSS 评分:18 ± 3 vs 19 ± 4),更有可能出现卒中后残疾(mRS < 3:35% vs 62%),患有更严重的抑郁症(SDS 评分:58 ± 16 vs 64 ± 13)和焦虑症(SAS 评分:52 ± 8 vs 59 ± 10)。与预后良好的患者相比,预后不良的患者表现出严重的神经功能缺损(入院NIHSS评分:17 ± 4 vs 20 ± 3),更有可能在CT图像上出现HDA(64% vs 33%),患有更严重的抑郁症(SDS评分:55 ± 19 vs 65 ± 11)和焦虑症(SAS评分:50 ± 8 vs 58 ± 12)。多变量分析显示,HDA 是独立的预后不良因素。结论 总之,在接受 EMT 的 AIS 患者中,CT 图像上的 HDA 预示着不良预后以及严重的抑郁和焦虑症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信