Stand biomass of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations benefits from high density monocultures in the boreal zone

IF 3.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Bingming Chen , Shensi Liu , Jinghua Yu , Yanqing Huang , Shuai Yu , Huanchu Liu , Tianyu Zhang , Xiangdong Liu , Guangze Jin , Wei Chen , Xingyuan He
{"title":"Stand biomass of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations benefits from high density monocultures in the boreal zone","authors":"Bingming Chen ,&nbsp;Shensi Liu ,&nbsp;Jinghua Yu ,&nbsp;Yanqing Huang ,&nbsp;Shuai Yu ,&nbsp;Huanchu Liu ,&nbsp;Tianyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiangdong Liu ,&nbsp;Guangze Jin ,&nbsp;Wei Chen ,&nbsp;Xingyuan He","doi":"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Pinus sylvestris</em> var. <em>mongolica</em> (<em>P. sylvestris</em>) plantations are extensively established in the boreal zone. Increasing stand biomass of these plantations can effectively enhance carbon stock, which is crucial for mitigating climate change. However, the current understanding of optimizing plantation strategies to maximize stand biomass is primarily derived from experiments in tropical and subtropical zones, which is difficult to extend to the boreal due to substantial climatic differences. Based on a comprehensive dataset from 1,076 sample plots of <em>P. sylvestris</em> plantations in the boreal zone of China, we evaluated the effects of tree species richness and stand density on tree height, diameter at breast height (DBH), and stand biomass to investigate the optimal plantation strategy. Furthermore, we examined how these effects changed with stand age and investigated their relative importance. We found that monocultures at a high stand density of 2,000–2,500 ​ha<sup>−1</sup> were the optimal plantation strategy to maximize stand biomass (107.5 ​Mg·ha<sup>−1</sup>), and this held true at almost all stand ages. Unfortunately, this strategy resulted in low species richness and small individual trees (10.6 ​m height and 9.8 ​cm DBH), thus presenting a trade-off. In addition, as stand age increased, the effect of tree species richness on stand biomass shifted from positive to negative, but the effect of stand density was always positive. Overall, stand age had the greatest effect on stand biomass, followed by stand density and then tree species richness. Our findings reveal a distinct plantation strategy for optimizing stand biomass of <em>P. sylvestris</em> plantations in the boreal zone. More importantly, this study highlights that (1) maximizing stand biomass in the boreal zone may compromise tree species richness; (2) net effects of tree species richness on stand biomass are not always positive, as negative selection effects offset positive complementary effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54270,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecosystems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000587/pdfft?md5=2632ec0bd03c49281616a62f81dc8823&pid=1-s2.0-S2197562024000587-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000587","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (P. sylvestris) plantations are extensively established in the boreal zone. Increasing stand biomass of these plantations can effectively enhance carbon stock, which is crucial for mitigating climate change. However, the current understanding of optimizing plantation strategies to maximize stand biomass is primarily derived from experiments in tropical and subtropical zones, which is difficult to extend to the boreal due to substantial climatic differences. Based on a comprehensive dataset from 1,076 sample plots of P. sylvestris plantations in the boreal zone of China, we evaluated the effects of tree species richness and stand density on tree height, diameter at breast height (DBH), and stand biomass to investigate the optimal plantation strategy. Furthermore, we examined how these effects changed with stand age and investigated their relative importance. We found that monocultures at a high stand density of 2,000–2,500 ​ha−1 were the optimal plantation strategy to maximize stand biomass (107.5 ​Mg·ha−1), and this held true at almost all stand ages. Unfortunately, this strategy resulted in low species richness and small individual trees (10.6 ​m height and 9.8 ​cm DBH), thus presenting a trade-off. In addition, as stand age increased, the effect of tree species richness on stand biomass shifted from positive to negative, but the effect of stand density was always positive. Overall, stand age had the greatest effect on stand biomass, followed by stand density and then tree species richness. Our findings reveal a distinct plantation strategy for optimizing stand biomass of P. sylvestris plantations in the boreal zone. More importantly, this study highlights that (1) maximizing stand biomass in the boreal zone may compromise tree species richness; (2) net effects of tree species richness on stand biomass are not always positive, as negative selection effects offset positive complementary effects.

北方地区高密度单株栽培的蒙古松种植园的林分生物量
北方地区广泛种植西伯利亚红松(Pinus sylvestris var.增加这些人工林的林分生物量可有效提高碳储量,这对减缓气候变化至关重要。然而,目前对优化种植策略以最大限度提高林分生物量的理解主要来自热带和亚热带地区的实验,由于气候差异巨大,很难推广到北方地区。基于中国北方地区 1076 个样地的综合数据集,我们评估了树种丰富度和林分密度对树高、胸径(DBH)和林分生物量的影响,以研究最佳植树造林策略。此外,我们还考察了这些影响随着林龄的变化而变化的情况,并研究了它们的相对重要性。我们发现,在林分密度为 2,000-2,500 公顷-1 的情况下,单株种植是实现林分生物量(107.5 兆克-公顷-1)最大化的最佳种植策略,而且几乎在所有林分年龄段都是如此。遗憾的是,这种策略导致物种丰富度较低,树木个体较小(树高 10.6 米,DBH 9.8 厘米),因此需要权衡利弊。此外,随着林分年龄的增加,树种丰富度对林分生物量的影响由正转负,但林分密度的影响始终为正。总体而言,林分年龄对林分生物量的影响最大,其次是林分密度,再次是树种丰富度。我们的研究结果揭示了一种独特的植树造林策略,可优化北寒带林木的林分生物量。更重要的是,这项研究强调:(1)在北方地区最大限度地提高林分生物量可能会损害树种丰富度;(2)树种丰富度对林分生物量的净效应并不总是正面的,因为负面的选择效应会抵消正面的互补效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Ecosystems
Forest Ecosystems Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1115
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecosystems is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing scientific communications from any discipline that can provide interesting contributions about the structure and dynamics of "natural" and "domesticated" forest ecosystems, and their services to people. The journal welcomes innovative science as well as application oriented work that will enhance understanding of woody plant communities. Very specific studies are welcome if they are part of a thematic series that provides some holistic perspective that is of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信