Statistical mechanics of plasticity: Elucidating anomalous size-effects and emergent fractional nonlocal continuum behavior

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Statistical mechanics of plasticity: Elucidating anomalous size-effects and emergent fractional nonlocal continuum behavior","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Extensive experiments over the decades unequivocally point to a pronounced scale-dependency of plastic deformation in metals. This observation is fairly general, and broadly speaking, strengthening against deformation is observed with the decrease in the size of a relevant geometrical feature of the material, e.g., the thickness of a thin film. The classical theory of plasticity is size-independent, and this has spurred extensive research into an appropriate continuum theory to elucidate the observed size effects. This pursuit has led to the emergence of strain gradient plasticity, along with its numerous variants, as the paradigm of choice. Recognizing the constrained shear of a thin metallic film as the model problem to understand the observed size-effect, all conventional (and reasonable candidate) theories of strain gradient plasticity predict a scaling of yield strength that inversely varies with the film thickness <span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo><msup><mrow><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>. Experimental findings indicate a considerably diminished scaling, the magnitude of which can exhibit significant variation based on processing conditions or even the mode of deformation. As an example, the scaling exponent as low as <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></math></span> has been observed for as-deposited copper thin films. Two perspectives have been posited to explain this perplexing anomaly. Kuroda and Needleman (2019) argue that the conventional boundary conditions used in strain gradient plasticity theory are not meaningful for the canonical constrained thin film problem and propose a physically motivated alternative. Dahlberg and Ortiz (2019) contend that the intrinsic differential calculus structure of all strain gradient plasticity theories will invariably lead to the incorrect (or rather inadequate) explanation of the size-scaling. They propose a fractional strain gradient plasticity framework where the fractional derivative order is a material property that correlates with the scaling exponent. In this work, we present an alternative approach that complements the existing explanations. We create a statistical mechanics model for interacting microscopic units that deform and yield with the rules of <em>classical plasticity</em>, and plastic yielding is treated as a phase transition. We coarse-grain the model to precisely elucidate the microscopic interactions that can lead to the emergent size-effects observed experimentally. Specifically, we find that depending on the nature of the long-range microscopic interactions, the emergent coarse-grained theory can be of fractional differential type or alternatively a form of integral nonlocal model. Our theory, therefore, provides a partial (and microscopic) justification for the fractional derivative model and makes clear the precise microscopic interactions that must be operative for a continuum plasticity theory to be a valid phenomenological descriptor for capturing the correct size-scale dependency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17331,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022509624002138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive experiments over the decades unequivocally point to a pronounced scale-dependency of plastic deformation in metals. This observation is fairly general, and broadly speaking, strengthening against deformation is observed with the decrease in the size of a relevant geometrical feature of the material, e.g., the thickness of a thin film. The classical theory of plasticity is size-independent, and this has spurred extensive research into an appropriate continuum theory to elucidate the observed size effects. This pursuit has led to the emergence of strain gradient plasticity, along with its numerous variants, as the paradigm of choice. Recognizing the constrained shear of a thin metallic film as the model problem to understand the observed size-effect, all conventional (and reasonable candidate) theories of strain gradient plasticity predict a scaling of yield strength that inversely varies with the film thickness h1. Experimental findings indicate a considerably diminished scaling, the magnitude of which can exhibit significant variation based on processing conditions or even the mode of deformation. As an example, the scaling exponent as low as 0.2 has been observed for as-deposited copper thin films. Two perspectives have been posited to explain this perplexing anomaly. Kuroda and Needleman (2019) argue that the conventional boundary conditions used in strain gradient plasticity theory are not meaningful for the canonical constrained thin film problem and propose a physically motivated alternative. Dahlberg and Ortiz (2019) contend that the intrinsic differential calculus structure of all strain gradient plasticity theories will invariably lead to the incorrect (or rather inadequate) explanation of the size-scaling. They propose a fractional strain gradient plasticity framework where the fractional derivative order is a material property that correlates with the scaling exponent. In this work, we present an alternative approach that complements the existing explanations. We create a statistical mechanics model for interacting microscopic units that deform and yield with the rules of classical plasticity, and plastic yielding is treated as a phase transition. We coarse-grain the model to precisely elucidate the microscopic interactions that can lead to the emergent size-effects observed experimentally. Specifically, we find that depending on the nature of the long-range microscopic interactions, the emergent coarse-grained theory can be of fractional differential type or alternatively a form of integral nonlocal model. Our theory, therefore, provides a partial (and microscopic) justification for the fractional derivative model and makes clear the precise microscopic interactions that must be operative for a continuum plasticity theory to be a valid phenomenological descriptor for capturing the correct size-scale dependency.

塑性统计力学:阐明异常尺寸效应和出现的分数非局部连续行为
几十年来的大量实验明确指出,金属的塑性变形具有明显的尺度依赖性。这一观察结果具有相当的普遍性,从广义上讲,随着材料相关几何特征(如薄膜厚度)尺寸的减小,可观察到抗变形能力的增强。塑性的经典理论与尺寸无关,这促使人们广泛研究适当的连续理论,以阐明观察到的尺寸效应。应变梯度塑性及其众多变体就是这种研究的成果。所有传统的(以及合理的候选)应变梯度塑性理论都将金属薄膜的约束剪切作为理解所观察到的尺寸效应的模型问题,并预测屈服强度的比例与薄膜厚度 ∼h-1 成反比变化。实验结果表明,这种缩放比例会大大减小,其大小会因加工条件甚至变形模式的不同而发生显著变化。例如,在沉积铜薄膜中观察到的缩放指数低至-0.2。有两种观点可以解释这种令人困惑的反常现象。Kuroda 和 Needleman(2019 年)认为,应变梯度塑性理论中使用的传统边界条件对典型约束薄膜问题没有意义,并提出了一种物理上的替代方案。Dahlberg 和 Ortiz(2019)认为,所有应变梯度塑性理论的内在微分微积分结构必然会导致对尺寸缩放的不正确(或不充分)解释。他们提出了一个分数应变梯度塑性框架,其中分数导数阶是与缩放指数相关的材料属性。在这项工作中,我们提出了另一种补充现有解释的方法。我们为相互作用的微观单元创建了一个统计力学模型,这些微观单元按照经典塑性规则变形和屈服,塑性屈服被视为一种相变。我们对模型进行了粗粒化处理,以精确阐明可导致实验观察到的新兴尺寸效应的微观相互作用。具体来说,我们发现,根据长程微观相互作用的性质,出现的粗粒度理论可以是分数微分类型的,也可以是积分非局部模型的一种形式。因此,我们的理论为分数导数模型提供了部分(和微观)理由,并阐明了连续可塑性理论必须具备的精确微观相互作用,才能成为捕捉正确尺寸尺度依赖性的有效现象学描述符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids
Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids 物理-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
276
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids is to publish research of the highest quality and of lasting significance on the mechanics of solids. The scope is broad, from fundamental concepts in mechanics to the analysis of novel phenomena and applications. Solids are interpreted broadly to include both hard and soft materials as well as natural and synthetic structures. The approach can be theoretical, experimental or computational.This research activity sits within engineering science and the allied areas of applied mathematics, materials science, bio-mechanics, applied physics, and geophysics. The Journal was founded in 1952 by Rodney Hill, who was its Editor-in-Chief until 1968. The topics of interest to the Journal evolve with developments in the subject but its basic ethos remains the same: to publish research of the highest quality relating to the mechanics of solids. Thus, emphasis is placed on the development of fundamental concepts of mechanics and novel applications of these concepts based on theoretical, experimental or computational approaches, drawing upon the various branches of engineering science and the allied areas within applied mathematics, materials science, structural engineering, applied physics, and geophysics. The main purpose of the Journal is to foster scientific understanding of the processes of deformation and mechanical failure of all solid materials, both technological and natural, and the connections between these processes and their underlying physical mechanisms. In this sense, the content of the Journal should reflect the current state of the discipline in analysis, experimental observation, and numerical simulation. In the interest of achieving this goal, authors are encouraged to consider the significance of their contributions for the field of mechanics and the implications of their results, in addition to describing the details of their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信