GRCop-42: Comparison between laser powder bed fusion and laser powder direct energy deposition

IF 4.2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Gabriel Demeneghi , Paul Gradl , Jason R. Mayeur , Kavan Hazeli
{"title":"GRCop-42: Comparison between laser powder bed fusion and laser powder direct energy deposition","authors":"Gabriel Demeneghi ,&nbsp;Paul Gradl ,&nbsp;Jason R. Mayeur ,&nbsp;Kavan Hazeli","doi":"10.1016/j.addlet.2024.100224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study involves a comparative analysis of additively manufactured GRCop-42 specimens produced using two processes: laser-powder bed fusion (L-PBF) and laser powder direct energy deposition (LP-DED). The investigation characterizes a range of material attributes, including surface topography, internal defects, microstructural features, quasi-static mechanical properties, and fractographic characteristics. The findings demonstrate that, despite the specimens being fabricated with the same base material, the resulting material properties vary significantly between the two additive manufacturing processes. As such, material properties cannot be presumed to be uniform across different manufacturing methods. Consequently, material characterization must be conducted for individual manufacturing processes based on specific parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72068,"journal":{"name":"Additive manufacturing letters","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100224"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277236902400032X/pdfft?md5=7f4251d0a304039b8027c87ac01f0bd1&pid=1-s2.0-S277236902400032X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Additive manufacturing letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277236902400032X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study involves a comparative analysis of additively manufactured GRCop-42 specimens produced using two processes: laser-powder bed fusion (L-PBF) and laser powder direct energy deposition (LP-DED). The investigation characterizes a range of material attributes, including surface topography, internal defects, microstructural features, quasi-static mechanical properties, and fractographic characteristics. The findings demonstrate that, despite the specimens being fabricated with the same base material, the resulting material properties vary significantly between the two additive manufacturing processes. As such, material properties cannot be presumed to be uniform across different manufacturing methods. Consequently, material characterization must be conducted for individual manufacturing processes based on specific parameters.

GRCop-42:激光粉末床熔融与激光粉末直接能量沉积的比较
本研究对使用激光粉末床熔融(L-PBF)和激光粉末直接能量沉积(LP-DED)两种工艺生产的增材制造 GRCop-42 试样进行了比较分析。这项研究描述了一系列材料属性,包括表面形貌、内部缺陷、微观结构特征、准静态力学性能和断口特征。研究结果表明,尽管试样是用相同的基体材料制造的,但两种快速成型制造工艺所产生的材料属性差异很大。因此,不能假定不同制造方法的材料特性是一致的。因此,必须根据特定参数对各个制造工艺进行材料表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Additive manufacturing letters
Additive manufacturing letters Materials Science (General), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信