{"title":"Perception of wide-expanse symmetric patterns","authors":"Fengping Hu , Darius Sinha , Sidney Diamond","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Humans are remarkably proficient at the task of distinguishing between symmetric and non-symmetric visual patterns. The neural mechanisms underlying this ability are still unclear. Here we examine symmetry perception along a dimension that can help place some constraints on the nature of these mechanisms. Specifically, we study whether and how human performance on the task of classifying patterns as bilaterally symmetric versus non-symmetric changes as a function of the spatial separation between the flanks. Working with briefly flashed stimuli that embody flank separations of 6 degrees to 54 degrees, we find that classification performance declines significantly with increasing inter-flank distance, but remains well above chance even at the largest separations. Response time registers a progressive increase as the space between the flanks expands. Baseline studies show that these performance changes cannot be attributed solely to reduced acuity in the visual periphery, or increased conduction times for relaying information from those locations. The findings argue for the need to adapt current feedforward models of symmetry perception to be more consistent with the empirical data, and also point to the possible involvement of recurrent processing, as suggested by recent computational results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924000993","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Humans are remarkably proficient at the task of distinguishing between symmetric and non-symmetric visual patterns. The neural mechanisms underlying this ability are still unclear. Here we examine symmetry perception along a dimension that can help place some constraints on the nature of these mechanisms. Specifically, we study whether and how human performance on the task of classifying patterns as bilaterally symmetric versus non-symmetric changes as a function of the spatial separation between the flanks. Working with briefly flashed stimuli that embody flank separations of 6 degrees to 54 degrees, we find that classification performance declines significantly with increasing inter-flank distance, but remains well above chance even at the largest separations. Response time registers a progressive increase as the space between the flanks expands. Baseline studies show that these performance changes cannot be attributed solely to reduced acuity in the visual periphery, or increased conduction times for relaying information from those locations. The findings argue for the need to adapt current feedforward models of symmetry perception to be more consistent with the empirical data, and also point to the possible involvement of recurrent processing, as suggested by recent computational results.
期刊介绍:
Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.