Comparing plant litter molecular diversity assessed from proximate analysis and 13C NMR spectroscopy

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Arjun Chakrawal , Björn D. Lindahl , Odeta Qafoku , Stefano Manzoni
{"title":"Comparing plant litter molecular diversity assessed from proximate analysis and 13C NMR spectroscopy","authors":"Arjun Chakrawal ,&nbsp;Björn D. Lindahl ,&nbsp;Odeta Qafoku ,&nbsp;Stefano Manzoni","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurate representation of the chemical diversity of litter in ecosystem-scale models is critical for improving predictions of decomposition rates and stabilization of plant material into soil organic matter. In this contribution, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate how conventional characterization of plant litter quality using proximate analysis compares with molecular-scale characterization using <sup>13</sup>C NMR spectroscopy. Using a molecular mixing model, we converted chemical shift regions from NMR into fractions of carbon (C) in five organic compound classes that are major constituents of plant material: carbohydrates, proteins, lignins, lipids, and carbonylic compounds. We found positive correlations between the acid soluble fraction and carbohydrates, and between the acid insoluble fraction and lignins. However, the acid-soluble fraction underestimated carbohydrates, and the acid insoluble fraction overestimated lignins by 243%. We identified two sources of uncertainties: i) disparities between litter chemical composition based on hydrolysability and actual chemical composition obtained from NMR and ii) conversion factors to translate proximate fractions into organic constituents. Both uncertainties are critical, potentially leading to misinterpretations of decay rates in litter decomposition models. Consequently, we recommend including explicit substrate chemistry data in the next generation of litter decomposition models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071724002062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate representation of the chemical diversity of litter in ecosystem-scale models is critical for improving predictions of decomposition rates and stabilization of plant material into soil organic matter. In this contribution, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate how conventional characterization of plant litter quality using proximate analysis compares with molecular-scale characterization using 13C NMR spectroscopy. Using a molecular mixing model, we converted chemical shift regions from NMR into fractions of carbon (C) in five organic compound classes that are major constituents of plant material: carbohydrates, proteins, lignins, lipids, and carbonylic compounds. We found positive correlations between the acid soluble fraction and carbohydrates, and between the acid insoluble fraction and lignins. However, the acid-soluble fraction underestimated carbohydrates, and the acid insoluble fraction overestimated lignins by 243%. We identified two sources of uncertainties: i) disparities between litter chemical composition based on hydrolysability and actual chemical composition obtained from NMR and ii) conversion factors to translate proximate fractions into organic constituents. Both uncertainties are critical, potentially leading to misinterpretations of decay rates in litter decomposition models. Consequently, we recommend including explicit substrate chemistry data in the next generation of litter decomposition models.

比较通过近似分析和 13C NMR 光谱评估的植物废弃物分子多样性
在生态系统尺度模型中准确表示枯落物的化学多样性,对于改进植物材料分解率和稳定为土壤有机物的预测至关重要。在这篇论文中,我们进行了一项系统性综述,以评估使用近似分析法对植物废弃物质量进行传统表征与使用 13C NMR 光谱法进行分子尺度表征的比较情况。利用分子混合模型,我们将核磁共振的化学位移区域转换为植物材料主要成分--碳水化合物、蛋白质、木质素、脂类和羰基化合物--中五类有机化合物的碳(C)分数。我们发现,酸溶性部分与碳水化合物、酸不溶性部分与木质素之间存在正相关。但是,酸溶性部分低估了碳水化合物,而酸不溶性部分则高估了木质素 243%。我们发现了两个不确定因素:i)基于水解性的垃圾化学成分与核磁共振获得的实际化学成分之间的差异;ii)将近似组分转化为有机成分的转换系数。这两种不确定性都很重要,可能会导致对垃圾分解模型中的腐烂率产生误解。因此,我们建议在下一代垃圾分解模型中加入明确的基质化学数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信