Outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest according to prehospital advanced airway management timing: a retrospective observational study.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sang-Hun Lee, Hyun Wook Ryoo
{"title":"Outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest according to prehospital advanced airway management timing: a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Sang-Hun Lee, Hyun Wook Ryoo","doi":"10.12701/jyms.2024.00332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), guidelines recommend advanced airway (AA) management at the advanced cardiovascular life support stage; however, the ideal timing remains controversial. Therefore, we evaluated the prognosis according to the timing of AA in patients with OHCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with OHCA at six major hospitals in Daegu Metropolitan City, South Korea, from August 2019 to June 2022. We compared groups with early and late AA and evaluated prognosis, including recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to discharge, and neurological evaluation, according to AA timing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,087 patients with OHCA, 945 underwent early AA management and 1,142 underwent late AA management. The timing of AA management did not influence ROSC in the emergency department (5-6 minutes: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97; p=0.914; 7-9 minutes: aOR, 1.37; p=0.223; ≥10 minutes: aOR, 1.32; p=0.345). The timing of AA management also did not influence survival to discharge (5-6 minutes: aOR, 0.79; p=0.680; 7-9 minutes: aOR, 1.04; p=0.944; ≥10 minutes: aOR, 1.86; p=0.320) or good neurological outcomes (5-6 minutes: aOR, 1.72; p=0.512; 7-9 minutes: aOR, 0.48; p=0.471; ≥10 minutes: aOR, 0.96; p=0.892).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AA timing in patients with OHCA was not associated with ROSC, survival to hospital discharge, or neurological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Yeungnam medical science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Yeungnam medical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2024.00332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), guidelines recommend advanced airway (AA) management at the advanced cardiovascular life support stage; however, the ideal timing remains controversial. Therefore, we evaluated the prognosis according to the timing of AA in patients with OHCA.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with OHCA at six major hospitals in Daegu Metropolitan City, South Korea, from August 2019 to June 2022. We compared groups with early and late AA and evaluated prognosis, including recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to discharge, and neurological evaluation, according to AA timing.

Results: Of 2,087 patients with OHCA, 945 underwent early AA management and 1,142 underwent late AA management. The timing of AA management did not influence ROSC in the emergency department (5-6 minutes: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97; p=0.914; 7-9 minutes: aOR, 1.37; p=0.223; ≥10 minutes: aOR, 1.32; p=0.345). The timing of AA management also did not influence survival to discharge (5-6 minutes: aOR, 0.79; p=0.680; 7-9 minutes: aOR, 1.04; p=0.944; ≥10 minutes: aOR, 1.86; p=0.320) or good neurological outcomes (5-6 minutes: aOR, 1.72; p=0.512; 7-9 minutes: aOR, 0.48; p=0.471; ≥10 minutes: aOR, 0.96; p=0.892).

Conclusion: AA timing in patients with OHCA was not associated with ROSC, survival to hospital discharge, or neurological outcomes.

院外心脏骤停患者的预后取决于院前高级气道管理的时机:一项回顾性观察研究。
背景:对于院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者,指南建议在高级心血管生命支持阶段进行高级气道(AA)管理;然而,理想的时机仍存在争议。因此,我们根据 OHCA 患者实施 AA 的时机对其预后进行了评估:我们在 2019 年 8 月至 2022 年 6 月期间对韩国大邱广域市六家主要医院的 OHCA 患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究。我们比较了早期和晚期AA组,并根据AA时间评估了预后,包括自主循环恢复(ROSC)、出院存活率和神经系统评估:在2087名OHCA患者中,945人接受了早期AA治疗,1142人接受了晚期AA治疗。AA管理的时间并不影响急诊科的ROSC(5-6分钟:调整比值比[aOR],0.97;p=0.914;7-9分钟:aOR,1.37;p=0.223;≥10分钟:aOR,1.32;p=0.345)。AA管理的时间也不影响出院后的存活率(5-6分钟:aOR,0.79;p=0.680;7-9分钟:aOR,1.04;p=0.944;≥10分钟:aOR,1.86;p=0.320)或良好的神经功能预后(5-6分钟:aOR,1.72;p=0.512;7-9分钟:aOR,0.48;p=0.471;≥10分钟:aOR,0.96;p=0.892):结论:OHCA 患者的 AA 时间与 ROSC、出院存活率或神经系统预后无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信