Retrospective evaluation of shock index and mortality in dogs with head trauma (2015–2020): 86 cases

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Briana M. McConnell DVM, Yonaira Cortes DVM, DACVECC, Dennis Bailey DVM, DACVIM
{"title":"Retrospective evaluation of shock index and mortality in dogs with head trauma (2015–2020): 86 cases","authors":"Briana M. McConnell DVM,&nbsp;Yonaira Cortes DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Dennis Bailey DVM, DACVIM","doi":"10.1111/vec.13411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the relationship between shock index (SI) and mortality in dogs with head trauma (HT). A secondary objective was to compare SI with the animal trauma triage (ATT) score and Modified Glasgow Coma Scale (MCGS) score in HT cases. A tertiary aim was to assess if SI is predictive of survival to discharge or improvement in presenting neurologic signs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective study from January 2015 to December 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Tertiary referral level II veterinary trauma center.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty-six dogs with evidence of HT presenting through emergency for various traumas compared to 60 healthy control dogs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>SI was calculated using the quotient of heart rate over systolic blood pressure measured on presentation. SI was significantly higher in HT patients than healthy controls (<i>P</i> = 0.0019). SI was not significantly different between traumatic brain injury dogs that died or were euthanized and HT dogs that lived until the time of discharge (<i>P</i> = 0.98). SI was not significantly different between HT dogs that were neurologically normal at the time of discharge and HT dogs that were static or improved but not normal neurologically at the time of discharge (<i>P</i> = 0.84). In HT dogs, SI did not correlate with ATT score (<i>P</i> = 0.16) or MGCS score (<i>P</i> = 0.75). There was no significant difference in SI and length of hospitalization until death or discharge (<i>P</i> = 0.78).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>SI was significantly higher in HT patients compared to control patients. Interestingly, SI was not correlated with ATT score or MGCS score. The use of SI in HT patients warrants further investigation to assess the efficacy in predicting mortality.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"34 4","pages":"387-392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the relationship between shock index (SI) and mortality in dogs with head trauma (HT). A secondary objective was to compare SI with the animal trauma triage (ATT) score and Modified Glasgow Coma Scale (MCGS) score in HT cases. A tertiary aim was to assess if SI is predictive of survival to discharge or improvement in presenting neurologic signs.

Design

Retrospective study from January 2015 to December 2020.

Setting

Tertiary referral level II veterinary trauma center.

Animals

Eighty-six dogs with evidence of HT presenting through emergency for various traumas compared to 60 healthy control dogs.

Measurements and Main Results

SI was calculated using the quotient of heart rate over systolic blood pressure measured on presentation. SI was significantly higher in HT patients than healthy controls (P = 0.0019). SI was not significantly different between traumatic brain injury dogs that died or were euthanized and HT dogs that lived until the time of discharge (P = 0.98). SI was not significantly different between HT dogs that were neurologically normal at the time of discharge and HT dogs that were static or improved but not normal neurologically at the time of discharge (P = 0.84). In HT dogs, SI did not correlate with ATT score (P = 0.16) or MGCS score (P = 0.75). There was no significant difference in SI and length of hospitalization until death or discharge (P = 0.78).

Conclusions

SI was significantly higher in HT patients compared to control patients. Interestingly, SI was not correlated with ATT score or MGCS score. The use of SI in HT patients warrants further investigation to assess the efficacy in predicting mortality.

犬头部外伤休克指数和死亡率的回顾性评估(2015-2020 年):86 例。
目的:评估休克指数(SI)与头部外伤(HT)犬死亡率之间的关系:评估休克指数(SI)与犬头部外伤(HT)死亡率之间的关系。次要目的是将休克指数与动物创伤分流(ATT)评分和改良格拉斯哥昏迷量表(MCGS)评分进行比较。第三个目的是评估 SI 是否可预测出院后的存活率或出现的神经体征是否有所改善:设计:2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月的回顾性研究:三级转诊二级兽医创伤中心:86只因各种创伤急诊就诊的有HT证据的狗与60只健康对照狗进行比较:SI用发病时测量的心率与收缩压之商计算。HT 患者的 SI 明显高于健康对照组(P = 0.0019)。死亡或安乐死的脑外伤犬与存活至出院的 HT 犬之间的 SI 无明显差异(P = 0.98)。出院时神经系统正常的 HT 狗与出院时静止或有所改善但神经系统不正常的 HT 狗之间的 SI 没有明显差异(P = 0.84)。在 HT 狗中,SI 与 ATT 评分(P = 0.16)或 MGCS 评分(P = 0.75)不相关。SI与死亡或出院前的住院时间没有明显差异(P = 0.78):结论:与对照组患者相比,高血压患者的 SI 明显更高。有趣的是,SI 与 ATT 评分或 MGCS 评分无关。在高血压患者中使用 SI 值得进一步研究,以评估其在预测死亡率方面的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
121
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues. The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信