The efficacy of various interventions as good strategies to reduce pain in botulinum neurotoxin A for wrinkles. A systematic review of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1080/14764172.2024.2374812
Bahareh Ebrahimi, Sina Jamzad, Zahra Naseh, Iman Moezzi, Hossein Kargar Jahromi, Maryam Naseh
{"title":"The efficacy of various interventions as good strategies to reduce pain in botulinum neurotoxin A for wrinkles. A systematic review of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs).","authors":"Bahareh Ebrahimi, Sina Jamzad, Zahra Naseh, Iman Moezzi, Hossein Kargar Jahromi, Maryam Naseh","doi":"10.1080/14764172.2024.2374812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various topical interventions have been described to minimize botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT)-induced pain. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of pain relief methods during BoNT injection. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched using \"Botox,\" \"Botulinum,\" or \"BTX.\" We identified RCTs in which BoNT were injected to eliminate wrinkles. The pain score was the study outcome, and pain reduction method was compared with routine one. The meta-analysis was reported using the PRISMA checklist. The Higgins I(I<sup>2</sup>) statistical model assessed results heterogeneity. Two thousand one hundred and twenty-three articles were identified, thirteen articles eligible. Two hundred and sixty-two healthy volunteers were performed on these RCTs. Meta-analysis evaluated different methods to ease BoNT injection pain, and these methods significantly improved outcomes by 0.23% (95%CI, 0.11-0.46, <i>p</i> = .000). Subgroup analysis based on injection area showed no significant heterogeneity, but heterogeneity decreased when subgroup analysis based on other methods was done (Cochran's Q test = 115.52, <i>p</i> = .0001, I<sup>2</sup> = 87.9%). This meta-analysis confirms the effectiveness of pain relief methods during BoNT injection. Evaluation of different methods showed their effectiveness, but finding the best method requires comparative studies, although the role of pH and EMLA has been proven.</p>","PeriodicalId":54852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2024.2374812","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various topical interventions have been described to minimize botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT)-induced pain. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of pain relief methods during BoNT injection. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched using "Botox," "Botulinum," or "BTX." We identified RCTs in which BoNT were injected to eliminate wrinkles. The pain score was the study outcome, and pain reduction method was compared with routine one. The meta-analysis was reported using the PRISMA checklist. The Higgins I(I2) statistical model assessed results heterogeneity. Two thousand one hundred and twenty-three articles were identified, thirteen articles eligible. Two hundred and sixty-two healthy volunteers were performed on these RCTs. Meta-analysis evaluated different methods to ease BoNT injection pain, and these methods significantly improved outcomes by 0.23% (95%CI, 0.11-0.46, p = .000). Subgroup analysis based on injection area showed no significant heterogeneity, but heterogeneity decreased when subgroup analysis based on other methods was done (Cochran's Q test = 115.52, p = .0001, I2 = 87.9%). This meta-analysis confirms the effectiveness of pain relief methods during BoNT injection. Evaluation of different methods showed their effectiveness, but finding the best method requires comparative studies, although the role of pH and EMLA has been proven.

A 型肉毒杆菌神经毒素治疗皱纹时,各种干预措施作为减痛良策的疗效。随机对照试验(RCTs)的系统回顾。
目前已有多种局部干预措施可最大程度地减轻肉毒杆菌神经毒素-A(BoNT)引起的疼痛。本研究的目的是对相关随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统性回顾,以比较注射 BoNT 期间各种止痛方法的疗效。我们使用 "Botox"、"Botulinum "或 "BTX "对 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 进行了检索。我们确定了注射 BoNT 以消除皱纹的 RCT。研究结果以疼痛评分为依据,并将减轻疼痛的方法与常规方法进行比较。荟萃分析采用 PRISMA 核对表进行报告。Higgins I(I2)统计模型评估了结果的异质性。共发现 213 篇文章,其中 13 篇符合条件。在这些 RCT 中,有 262 名健康志愿者接受了治疗。Meta 分析评估了缓解 BoNT 注射疼痛的不同方法,这些方法显著改善了 0.23% 的疗效(95%CI,0.11-0.46,p = .000)。基于注射区域的亚组分析显示无明显异质性,但基于其他方法的亚组分析显示异质性降低(Cochran's Q test = 115.52,p = .0001,I2 = 87.9%)。这项荟萃分析证实了 BoNT 注射过程中止痛方法的有效性。尽管 pH 值和 EMLA 的作用已得到证实,但对不同方法的评估显示了它们的有效性,但要找到最佳方法还需要进行比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique journal that focuses on the application of cosmetic laser and light therapies on the skin. The Journal of Cosmetic & Laser Therapy provides a forum for stimulating and up-to-date studies demonstrating the wide range of therapeutic options for clinicians and surgeons involved in cosmetic and dermatological treatment. The journal is aimed at dermatologists, cosmetic surgeons, plastic and facial plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and all those interested in the rapidly expanding field of cosmetic and laser therapy. Features include: -Cosmetic surgery, including facial rejuvenation, hair removal and skin resurfacing -Use of lasers and other light sources for cosmetic and dermatological treatment -Applications of peeling agents, fillers, injectables, implants and other cosmetic modalities -Topical treatments -Practical tips and safety issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信