Identifying neurofunctional domains across substance use disorders.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Emily E Hartwell, Melanie Schwandt, Yaira Z Nunez, Reagan R Wetherill, Rachel L Kember, Corinde E Wiers, Joel Gelernter, Henry R Kranzler
{"title":"Identifying neurofunctional domains across substance use disorders.","authors":"Emily E Hartwell, Melanie Schwandt, Yaira Z Nunez, Reagan R Wetherill, Rachel L Kember, Corinde E Wiers, Joel Gelernter, Henry R Kranzler","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2024.2368180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Substance use disorders (SUDs) are heterogeneous across multiple functional domains. Various frameworks posit that domains (e.g., executive function) contribute to the persistence of SUDs; however, the domains identified in different studies vary.<i>Objectives:</i> We used factor analysis to identify the underlying latent domains present in a large sample (<i>N</i> = 5,244, 55.8% male) with a variety of SUDs to yield findings more generalizable than studies with a narrower focus.<i>Method:</i> Participants (1,384 controls and 3,860 participants with one or more SUDs including alcohol, cocaine, cannabis, and/or opioid use disorders) completed the Semi-Structured Assessment for Drug Dependence and Alcoholism, the NEO Personality Inventory, and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and fit indices (root mean-squared error of approximation (RMSEA), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI)) were used to examine different latent variable models. A multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) approach-tested associations of the latent variables with sociodemographics, substance use, and a history of abuse/neglect.<i>Results:</i> A six-factor model (predominant alcohol, predominant cocaine, predominant opioid, externalizing, personality, and executive function) provided the best fit [RMSEA = 0.063 (90% CI 0.060, 0.066), CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.96]. All factors were moderately correlated (coefficient = 0.25-0.55, <i>p</i> < .05) with the exception of executive function. MIMIC analysis revealed different patterns of associations (all <i>p</i> < .0001) with sociodemographics, substance use, and a history of abuse/neglect among the factors.<i>Conclusions:</i> The domains identified, particularly executive function, were parallel to those observed previously. These factors underscore the heterogeneous nature of SUDs and may be useful in developing more targeted clinical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"536-546"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2024.2368180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs) are heterogeneous across multiple functional domains. Various frameworks posit that domains (e.g., executive function) contribute to the persistence of SUDs; however, the domains identified in different studies vary.Objectives: We used factor analysis to identify the underlying latent domains present in a large sample (N = 5,244, 55.8% male) with a variety of SUDs to yield findings more generalizable than studies with a narrower focus.Method: Participants (1,384 controls and 3,860 participants with one or more SUDs including alcohol, cocaine, cannabis, and/or opioid use disorders) completed the Semi-Structured Assessment for Drug Dependence and Alcoholism, the NEO Personality Inventory, and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and fit indices (root mean-squared error of approximation (RMSEA), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI)) were used to examine different latent variable models. A multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) approach-tested associations of the latent variables with sociodemographics, substance use, and a history of abuse/neglect.Results: A six-factor model (predominant alcohol, predominant cocaine, predominant opioid, externalizing, personality, and executive function) provided the best fit [RMSEA = 0.063 (90% CI 0.060, 0.066), CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.96]. All factors were moderately correlated (coefficient = 0.25-0.55, p < .05) with the exception of executive function. MIMIC analysis revealed different patterns of associations (all p < .0001) with sociodemographics, substance use, and a history of abuse/neglect among the factors.Conclusions: The domains identified, particularly executive function, were parallel to those observed previously. These factors underscore the heterogeneous nature of SUDs and may be useful in developing more targeted clinical interventions.

识别不同药物使用障碍的神经功能领域。
背景:药物使用障碍(SUDs)在多个功能领域存在差异。各种框架都认为功能域(如执行功能)是导致药物滥用障碍持续存在的原因;然而,不同研究中确定的功能域却各不相同:我们使用因子分析来识别患有各种 SUD 的大样本(样本数 = 5,244 人,55.8% 为男性)中存在的潜在功能域,从而得出比关注点较窄的研究更具有普遍性的结论:参与者(1,384 名对照组和 3,860 名患有一种或多种 SUD(包括酒精、可卡因、大麻和/或阿片类药物使用障碍)的参与者)完成了药物依赖和酒精中毒半结构化评估、NEO 人格问卷和威斯康星卡片分类测试。探索性因子分析(EFA)和拟合指数(均方根近似误差(RMSEA)、比较拟合指数(CFI)和塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI))用于检验不同的潜在变量模型。多指标、多原因(MIMIC)方法检验了潜变量与社会人口统计学、药物使用和虐待/忽视史之间的关联:六因素模型(酒精占优势、可卡因占优势、阿片类药物占优势、外化、人格和执行功能)的拟合效果最佳[RMSEA = 0.063 (90% CI 0.060, 0.066),CFI = 0.98,TLI = 0.96]。所有因素均呈中度相关(系数=0.25-0.55,p p 结论:所发现的领域,尤其是执行功能,与之前观察到的领域相似。这些因素强调了 SUDs 的异质性,可能有助于制定更有针对性的临床干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信