{"title":"Validity of the estimated angular information obtained using an inertial motion capture system during standing trunk forward and backward bending.","authors":"Taiki Morikawa, Nariyuki Mura, Toshiaki Sato, Hiroshi Katoh","doi":"10.1186/s13102-024-00942-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bending the trunk forward and backward while standing are common daily activities and can have various patterns. However, any dysfunction in these movements can considerably affect daily living activities. Consequently, a comprehensive evaluation of spinal motion during these activities and precise identification of any movement abnormalities are important to facilitate an effective rehabilitation. In recent years, with the development of measurement technology, the evaluation of movement patterns using an inertial motion capture system (motion sensor) has become easy. However, the accuracy of estimated angular information obtained via motion sensor measurements can be affected by angular velocity. This study aimed to compare the validity of estimated angular information obtained by assessing standing trunk forward and backward bending at different movement speeds using a motion sensor with a three-dimensional motion analysis system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study included 12 healthy older men. A three-dimensional motion analysis system and a motion sensor were used for measurement. The participants performed standing trunk forward and backward bending at comfortable and maximum speeds, and five sensors were attached to their spine. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired t-test, intraclass correlation coefficient, mean absolute error, and multiple correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that the estimated angular information obtained using each motion sensor was not affected by angular velocity and had a high validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therefore, the angular velocity in this study can be applied clinically for an objective evaluation in rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"16 1","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00942-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Bending the trunk forward and backward while standing are common daily activities and can have various patterns. However, any dysfunction in these movements can considerably affect daily living activities. Consequently, a comprehensive evaluation of spinal motion during these activities and precise identification of any movement abnormalities are important to facilitate an effective rehabilitation. In recent years, with the development of measurement technology, the evaluation of movement patterns using an inertial motion capture system (motion sensor) has become easy. However, the accuracy of estimated angular information obtained via motion sensor measurements can be affected by angular velocity. This study aimed to compare the validity of estimated angular information obtained by assessing standing trunk forward and backward bending at different movement speeds using a motion sensor with a three-dimensional motion analysis system.
Methods: The current study included 12 healthy older men. A three-dimensional motion analysis system and a motion sensor were used for measurement. The participants performed standing trunk forward and backward bending at comfortable and maximum speeds, and five sensors were attached to their spine. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired t-test, intraclass correlation coefficient, mean absolute error, and multiple correlation coefficient.
Results: Results showed that the estimated angular information obtained using each motion sensor was not affected by angular velocity and had a high validity.
Conclusions: Therefore, the angular velocity in this study can be applied clinically for an objective evaluation in rehabilitation.
背景介绍站立时躯干向前和向后弯曲是常见的日常活动,可以有多种模式。然而,这些动作中的任何功能障碍都会严重影响日常生活活动。因此,全面评估脊柱在这些活动中的运动情况并准确识别任何运动异常对于促进有效康复非常重要。近年来,随着测量技术的发展,使用惯性运动捕捉系统(运动传感器)对运动模式进行评估已变得非常容易。然而,通过运动传感器测量获得的估计角度信息的准确性会受到角速度的影响。本研究旨在比较在不同运动速度下使用运动传感器和三维运动分析系统评估站立躯干前屈和后弯所获得的估计角度信息的有效性:本研究包括 12 名健康的老年男性。测量时使用了三维运动分析系统和运动传感器。参与者以舒适和最高速度进行站立躯干前屈和后弯,脊柱上安装了五个传感器。采用配对 t 检验、类内相关系数、平均绝对误差和多重相关系数进行统计分析:结果表明,使用各运动传感器获得的估计角度信息不受角速度的影响,具有较高的有效性:因此,本研究中的角速度可用于临床康复的客观评估。
期刊介绍:
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.