Predictors of length of time in service: Characteristics of people in intensive case management for longer than 5 years.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Maryann Roebuck, Todd Bridger, Ariane Magny, Emmy Tiderington, Tim Aubry
{"title":"Predictors of length of time in service: Characteristics of people in intensive case management for longer than 5 years.","authors":"Maryann Roebuck, Todd Bridger, Ariane Magny, Emmy Tiderington, Tim Aubry","doi":"10.1037/prj0000619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of people who stay in intensive case management (ICM) for longer than 5 years.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of client data collected by a community mental health organization from 2012 to 2022. Using the Gelberg-Andersen Model for Access to Health Services, we conducted a logistic regression with 22 predictor variables, predicting clients in ICM for 5 years or less (<i>N</i> = 531) and those in ICM for longer than 5 years (<i>N</i> = 289).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People who were older and those with psychotic disorder, co-occurring substance use disorder, dual diagnosis (with developmental disability), chronic medical condition, and also in another program in the same agency were more likely to be in ICM for longer than 5 years. People who were returning ICM clients and those who completed the ICM program (rather than withdrawing or disengaging) were more likely to be in ICM for 5 years or less. Higher dose of ICM (in contacts) predicted a shorter time in ICM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>People with serious mental illness, dual diagnosis, concurrent substance use, and chronic medical conditions and those who are older may need additional supports within ICM and when transitioning out of ICM. People in ICM for a longer time have lower numbers of contacts, indicating that a less intense service may meet their needs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000619","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of people who stay in intensive case management (ICM) for longer than 5 years.

Method: We conducted a secondary analysis of client data collected by a community mental health organization from 2012 to 2022. Using the Gelberg-Andersen Model for Access to Health Services, we conducted a logistic regression with 22 predictor variables, predicting clients in ICM for 5 years or less (N = 531) and those in ICM for longer than 5 years (N = 289).

Results: People who were older and those with psychotic disorder, co-occurring substance use disorder, dual diagnosis (with developmental disability), chronic medical condition, and also in another program in the same agency were more likely to be in ICM for longer than 5 years. People who were returning ICM clients and those who completed the ICM program (rather than withdrawing or disengaging) were more likely to be in ICM for 5 years or less. Higher dose of ICM (in contacts) predicted a shorter time in ICM.

Conclusions and implications for practice: People with serious mental illness, dual diagnosis, concurrent substance use, and chronic medical conditions and those who are older may need additional supports within ICM and when transitioning out of ICM. People in ICM for a longer time have lower numbers of contacts, indicating that a less intense service may meet their needs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

服务时间长短的预测因素:接受强化个案管理超过 5 年者的特征。
研究目的本研究的目的是探讨在强化个案管理(ICM)中停留时间超过 5 年的人群的特征:我们对一家社区心理健康机构从 2012 年至 2022 年收集的客户数据进行了二次分析。我们使用格尔伯格-安德森健康服务获取模型(Gelberg-Andersen Model for Access to Health Services),利用 22 个预测变量进行了逻辑回归,预测了接受强化个案管理 5 年或 5 年以下的患者(N = 531)和接受强化个案管理 5 年以上的患者(N = 289):结果:年龄较大、患有精神障碍、并发药物使用障碍、双重诊断(伴有发育障碍)、慢性病以及在同一机构的另一个项目中的人,更有可能在 ICM 服务超过 5 年。重返 ICM 的客户和完成 ICM 计划(而不是退出或脱离)的人更有可能在 ICM 中持续 5 年或更短时间。较高的 ICM 剂量(接触次数)预示着较短的 ICM 时间:有严重精神疾病、双重诊断、并发药物使用、慢性疾病的人以及年龄较大的人,在 ICM 中以及从 ICM 中过渡出来时,可能需要额外的支持。在 ICM 中接触时间较长的人接触次数较少,这表明强度较低的服务可能会满足他们的需求。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 年美国心理学会,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is sponsored by the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, at Boston University"s Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences and by the US Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (USPRA) . The mission of the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is to promote the development of new knowledge related to psychiatric rehabilitation and recovery of persons with serious mental illnesses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信