Quantitative stakeholder-driven assessment of radiation protection issues via a PIANOFORTE online survey.

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1007/s00411-024-01084-1
Veronika Groma, Balázs Madas, Florian Rauser, Mandy Birschwilks, Andreas Blume, Almudena Real, Rein Murakas, Boguslaw Michalik, Isabel Paiva, Tone-Mette Sjømoen, Alan H Tkaczyk, Jelena Mrdakovic Popic
{"title":"Quantitative stakeholder-driven assessment of radiation protection issues via a PIANOFORTE online survey.","authors":"Veronika Groma, Balázs Madas, Florian Rauser, Mandy Birschwilks, Andreas Blume, Almudena Real, Rein Murakas, Boguslaw Michalik, Isabel Paiva, Tone-Mette Sjømoen, Alan H Tkaczyk, Jelena Mrdakovic Popic","doi":"10.1007/s00411-024-01084-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To enhance stakeholder engagement and foster the inclusion of interests of citizens in radiation protection research, a comprehensive online survey was developed within the framework of the European Partnership PIANOFORTE. This survey was performed in 2022 and presented an opportunity for a wide range of stakeholders to voice their opinions on research priorities in radiation protection for the foreseeable future. Simultaneously, it delved into pertinent issues surrounding general radiation protection. The PIANOFORTE e-survey was conducted in the English language, accommodating a diverse range of participants. Overall, 440 respondents provided their insights and feedback, representing a broad geographical reach encompassing 29 European countries, as well as Canada, China, Colombia, India, and the United States. To assess the outcomes, the Positive Matrix Factorization numerical model was applied, in addition to qualitative and quantitative assessment of individual responses, enabling the discernment of four distinct stakeholder groups with varying attitudes. While the questionnaire may not fully represent all stakeholders due to the limited respondent pool, it is noteworthy that approximately 70% of the participants were newcomers to comparable surveys, demonstrating a proactive attitude, a strong willingness to collaborate and the necessity to continuously engage with stakeholder groups. Among the individual respondents, distinct opinions emerged particularly regarding health effects of radiation exposure, medical use of radiation, radiation protection of workers and the public, as well as emergency and recovery preparedness and response. In cluster analysis, none of the identified groups had clear preferences concerning the prioritization of future radiation protection research topics.</p>","PeriodicalId":21002,"journal":{"name":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","volume":" ","pages":"307-322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11341616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-024-01084-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To enhance stakeholder engagement and foster the inclusion of interests of citizens in radiation protection research, a comprehensive online survey was developed within the framework of the European Partnership PIANOFORTE. This survey was performed in 2022 and presented an opportunity for a wide range of stakeholders to voice their opinions on research priorities in radiation protection for the foreseeable future. Simultaneously, it delved into pertinent issues surrounding general radiation protection. The PIANOFORTE e-survey was conducted in the English language, accommodating a diverse range of participants. Overall, 440 respondents provided their insights and feedback, representing a broad geographical reach encompassing 29 European countries, as well as Canada, China, Colombia, India, and the United States. To assess the outcomes, the Positive Matrix Factorization numerical model was applied, in addition to qualitative and quantitative assessment of individual responses, enabling the discernment of four distinct stakeholder groups with varying attitudes. While the questionnaire may not fully represent all stakeholders due to the limited respondent pool, it is noteworthy that approximately 70% of the participants were newcomers to comparable surveys, demonstrating a proactive attitude, a strong willingness to collaborate and the necessity to continuously engage with stakeholder groups. Among the individual respondents, distinct opinions emerged particularly regarding health effects of radiation exposure, medical use of radiation, radiation protection of workers and the public, as well as emergency and recovery preparedness and response. In cluster analysis, none of the identified groups had clear preferences concerning the prioritization of future radiation protection research topics.

Abstract Image

通过 PIANOFORTE 在线调查,由利益相关者对辐射防护问题进行定量评估。
为加强利益相关方的参与,促进将公民的利益纳入辐射防护研究,在欧洲合作伙伴关系 PIANOFORTE 框架内开发了一项全面的在线调查。该调查于 2022 年进行,为广泛的利益相关者提供了一个就可预见的未来辐射防护研究重点发表意见的机会。同时,调查还深入探讨了与一般辐射防护相关的问题。PIANOFORTE 电子调查以英语进行,以满足不同参与者的需求。总共有 440 名受访者提供了他们的见解和反馈意见,代表了 29 个欧洲国家以及加拿大、中国、哥伦比亚、印度和美国的广泛地域范围。为了评估结果,除了对个人答复进行定性和定量评估外,还采用了正矩阵因式分解数字模型,从而能够分辨出态度各异的四个不同利益相关者群体。虽然由于受访者人数有限,问卷可能无法完全代表所有利益相关者,但值得注意的是,约 70% 的参与者是可比调查的新参与者,这表明了他们积极主动的态度、强烈的合作意愿以及与利益相关者群体持续接触的必要性。在个人受访者中,特别是在辐照对健康的影响、辐射的医疗用途、工人和公众的辐射防护以及应急和恢复准备与响应方面,出现了不同的意见。在聚类分析中,所确定的群体中没有一个对未来辐射防护研究课题的优先次序有明确的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to fundamental and applied issues in radiation research and biophysics. The topics may include: Biophysics of ionizing radiation: radiation physics and chemistry, radiation dosimetry, radiobiology, radioecology, biophysical foundations of medical applications of radiation, and radiation protection. Biological effects of radiation: experimental or theoretical work on molecular or cellular effects; relevance of biological effects for risk assessment; biological effects of medical applications of radiation; relevance of radiation for biosphere and in space; modelling of ecosystems; modelling of transport processes of substances in biotic systems. Risk assessment: epidemiological studies of cancer and non-cancer effects; quantification of risk including exposures to radiation and confounding factors Contributions to these topics may include theoretical-mathematical and experimental material, as well as description of new techniques relevant for the study of these issues. They can range from complex radiobiological phenomena to issues in health physics and environmental protection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信