{"title":"Patient dose and associated exposure parameters in pelvic x-ray examinations: dependence on radiographic system.","authors":"Sachith Welarathna, Sivakumar Velautham, Sivananthan Sarasanandarajah","doi":"10.1007/s00411-024-01080-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Technological differences between computed radiography (CR) and digital radiography (DR) systems can influence patient doses and exposure parameters in pelvic x-ray examinations. The presence of radiosensitive organs in the pelvic region underscores the need to optimize these parameters for both CR and DR systems. This prospective study aimed to compare the patient doses and exposure parameters for adult patients undergoing pelvic x-ray examinations using CR and DR systems, based on data from Sri Lanka. The study included data from 56 x-ray examinations, with 25 using CR and 31 using DR. Patient demographic characteristics and exposure parameters (kVp: kilovoltage peak, mAs: tube current-exposure time product) were recorded, and patient doses were measured in terms of the kerma-area product (P<sub>KA</sub>) using a P<sub>KA</sub> meter. Despite similar mean weight and body mass index (BMI), the CR systems showed significantly higher mean kVp (7.4%), mAs (16.4%), and P<sub>KA</sub> (29.7%) than the DR systems (CR - kVp: 73.2, mAs: 37.8, P<sub>KA</sub>: 2.29 Gy cm<sup>2</sup>; DR - kVp: 67.8, mAs: 31.6, P<sub>KA</sub>: 1.61 Gy cm<sup>2</sup>). The Mann-Whitney U test revealed statistically significant differences in P<sub>KA</sub> and kVp between the CR and DR systems (p < 0.05). Furthermore, even with lower patient weight and BMI, the mean mAs and P<sub>KA</sub> in this study were substantially higher than those reported in the literature for both CR and DR systems. These results suggest the need to optimize current mAs settings for the studied hospitals and introduce radiographic system-specific exposure parameters and reference dose levels for pelvic x-ray examinations in order to enhance patient protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":21002,"journal":{"name":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","volume":" ","pages":"433-442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-024-01080-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Technological differences between computed radiography (CR) and digital radiography (DR) systems can influence patient doses and exposure parameters in pelvic x-ray examinations. The presence of radiosensitive organs in the pelvic region underscores the need to optimize these parameters for both CR and DR systems. This prospective study aimed to compare the patient doses and exposure parameters for adult patients undergoing pelvic x-ray examinations using CR and DR systems, based on data from Sri Lanka. The study included data from 56 x-ray examinations, with 25 using CR and 31 using DR. Patient demographic characteristics and exposure parameters (kVp: kilovoltage peak, mAs: tube current-exposure time product) were recorded, and patient doses were measured in terms of the kerma-area product (PKA) using a PKA meter. Despite similar mean weight and body mass index (BMI), the CR systems showed significantly higher mean kVp (7.4%), mAs (16.4%), and PKA (29.7%) than the DR systems (CR - kVp: 73.2, mAs: 37.8, PKA: 2.29 Gy cm2; DR - kVp: 67.8, mAs: 31.6, PKA: 1.61 Gy cm2). The Mann-Whitney U test revealed statistically significant differences in PKA and kVp between the CR and DR systems (p < 0.05). Furthermore, even with lower patient weight and BMI, the mean mAs and PKA in this study were substantially higher than those reported in the literature for both CR and DR systems. These results suggest the need to optimize current mAs settings for the studied hospitals and introduce radiographic system-specific exposure parameters and reference dose levels for pelvic x-ray examinations in order to enhance patient protection.
计算机放射成像(CR)和数字放射成像(DR)系统之间的技术差异会影响骨盆 X 射线检查中的患者剂量和曝光参数。骨盆区域存在对辐射敏感的器官,因此有必要优化 CR 和 DR 系统的这些参数。这项前瞻性研究旨在根据斯里兰卡的数据,比较使用 CR 和 DR 系统进行盆腔 X 光检查的成年患者的剂量和照射参数。研究包括 56 次 X 光检查的数据,其中 25 次使用 CR 系统,31 次使用 DR 系统。研究人员记录了患者的人口统计学特征和照射参数(kVp:千伏峰值,mAs:管电流-照射时间乘积),并使用 PKA 测量仪以 Kerma 面积乘积(PKA)的形式测量了患者的剂量。尽管平均体重和体重指数(BMI)相似,但 CR 系统的平均 kVp(7.4%)、mAs(16.4%)和 PKA(29.7%)均明显高于 DR 系统(CR - kVp:73.2;mAs:16.4%;PKA:29.7%):73.2,mAs:37.8, PKA: 2.29 Gy cm2; DR - kVp:67.8,mAs:31.6,PKA:1.61 Gy cm2)。Mann-Whitney U 检验显示,CR 和 DR 系统之间的 PKA 和 kVp 有显著的统计学差异(本研究中的 p KA 远高于文献中报道的 CR 和 DR 系统的 p KA)。这些结果表明,有必要优化所研究医院目前的 mAs 设置,并为盆腔 X 射线检查引入针对特定放射系统的曝光参数和参考剂量水平,以加强对患者的保护。
期刊介绍:
This journal is devoted to fundamental and applied issues in radiation research and biophysics. The topics may include:
Biophysics of ionizing radiation: radiation physics and chemistry, radiation dosimetry, radiobiology, radioecology, biophysical foundations of medical applications of radiation, and radiation protection.
Biological effects of radiation: experimental or theoretical work on molecular or cellular effects; relevance of biological effects for risk assessment; biological effects of medical applications of radiation; relevance of radiation for biosphere and in space; modelling of ecosystems; modelling of transport processes of substances in biotic systems.
Risk assessment: epidemiological studies of cancer and non-cancer effects; quantification of risk including exposures to radiation and confounding factors
Contributions to these topics may include theoretical-mathematical and experimental material, as well as description of new techniques relevant for the study of these issues. They can range from complex radiobiological phenomena to issues in health physics and environmental protection.