Junichi Suganuma , Kozo Ueta , Koji Nakanishi , Yumi Ikeda , Shu Morioka
{"title":"Difference between voluntary control and conscious balance processing during quiet standing","authors":"Junichi Suganuma , Kozo Ueta , Koji Nakanishi , Yumi Ikeda , Shu Morioka","doi":"10.1016/j.neulet.2024.137900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The mechanism by which postural threat induced by standing at a high height causes a decrease in the amplitude and an increase in the frequency of postural sway might involve voluntary control (VC) to avoid swaying, rather than conscious balance processing, in which postural threat directs conscious balance processing. This study aimed to clarify the differences between VC and conscious balance processing during quiet standing. Twenty-seven healthy young adults were instructed to stand with their feet placed together and keep their eyes open. The standing task was performed under three standing conditions: relaxed, VC, and high-conscious movement processing (high-CMP). The center of pressure in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions was measured using a stabilometer to assess differences in postural control. The results indicated that the mean power frequency (MPF) ML and high frequency (HF) ML were higher in the VC condition than in the high-CMP condition. In the VC and high-CMP conditions, compared with the relaxed condition, MPF AP was higher, whereas the root mean square AP and low frequency AP were lower. These results show that the sway amplitude is lower, and the frequency is higher in both the VC and high-CMP conditions compared with those in the relaxed condition; however, the frequency is higher in the VC condition than in the high-CMP condition, suggesting that the VC condition is similar to postural control under the postural threat condition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19290,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304394024002787","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The mechanism by which postural threat induced by standing at a high height causes a decrease in the amplitude and an increase in the frequency of postural sway might involve voluntary control (VC) to avoid swaying, rather than conscious balance processing, in which postural threat directs conscious balance processing. This study aimed to clarify the differences between VC and conscious balance processing during quiet standing. Twenty-seven healthy young adults were instructed to stand with their feet placed together and keep their eyes open. The standing task was performed under three standing conditions: relaxed, VC, and high-conscious movement processing (high-CMP). The center of pressure in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions was measured using a stabilometer to assess differences in postural control. The results indicated that the mean power frequency (MPF) ML and high frequency (HF) ML were higher in the VC condition than in the high-CMP condition. In the VC and high-CMP conditions, compared with the relaxed condition, MPF AP was higher, whereas the root mean square AP and low frequency AP were lower. These results show that the sway amplitude is lower, and the frequency is higher in both the VC and high-CMP conditions compared with those in the relaxed condition; however, the frequency is higher in the VC condition than in the high-CMP condition, suggesting that the VC condition is similar to postural control under the postural threat condition.
期刊介绍:
Neuroscience Letters is devoted to the rapid publication of short, high-quality papers of interest to the broad community of neuroscientists. Only papers which will make a significant addition to the literature in the field will be published. Papers in all areas of neuroscience - molecular, cellular, developmental, systems, behavioral and cognitive, as well as computational - will be considered for publication. Submission of laboratory investigations that shed light on disease mechanisms is encouraged. Special Issues, edited by Guest Editors to cover new and rapidly-moving areas, will include invited mini-reviews. Occasional mini-reviews in especially timely areas will be considered for publication, without invitation, outside of Special Issues; these un-solicited mini-reviews can be submitted without invitation but must be of very high quality. Clinical studies will also be published if they provide new information about organization or actions of the nervous system, or provide new insights into the neurobiology of disease. NSL does not publish case reports.