Reducing intrusive suicidal mental images in patients with depressive symptoms through a dual-task add-on module: Results of a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

IF 4.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jaël S van Bentum, Marit Sijbrandij, Ad J F M Kerkhof, Emily A Holmes, Arnoud Arntz, Nathan Bachrach, Chloë S C Bollen, Daan Creemers, Maarten K van Dijk, Pieter Dingemanse, Monique van Haaren, Marieke Hesseling, Annemiek Huisman, Fleur L Kraanen, Yvonne Stikkelbroek, Jos Twisk, Henricus L Van, Janna Vrijsen, Remco F P de Winter, Marcus J H Huibers
{"title":"Reducing intrusive suicidal mental images in patients with depressive symptoms through a dual-task add-on module: Results of a multicenter randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Jaël S van Bentum, Marit Sijbrandij, Ad J F M Kerkhof, Emily A Holmes, Arnoud Arntz, Nathan Bachrach, Chloë S C Bollen, Daan Creemers, Maarten K van Dijk, Pieter Dingemanse, Monique van Haaren, Marieke Hesseling, Annemiek Huisman, Fleur L Kraanen, Yvonne Stikkelbroek, Jos Twisk, Henricus L Van, Janna Vrijsen, Remco F P de Winter, Marcus J H Huibers","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the safety and efficacy of a brief cognitive dual-task (using eye movements) add-on module to treatment as usual (TAU) in reducing the severity and frequency of intrusive suicidal mental images and suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a single-blind, parallel multicenter randomized trial (No. NTR7563) among adult psychiatric outpatients (<i>N</i> = 91; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 34.4, <i>SD</i> = 13.54; 68% female) with elevated depressive symptoms and experiencing distressing suicidal intrusions in the Netherlands. Primary outcome was the severity (Suicidal Intrusions Attributes Scale) and frequency (Clinical Interview for Suicidal Intrusions) of suicidal mental imagery intrusions at 1-week posttreatment and 3-month follow-up. Primary analysis was intention-to-treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 27, 2018 and September 13, 2021, 91 patients were included and randomly assigned to intervention group (Cognitive Dual Task Add-on + TAU) (<i>n</i> = 46) or TAU-only (<i>n</i> = 45). Cognitive Dual Task Add-on + TAU had greater reductions in severity (mean difference, -15.50, 95% CI [23.81, -7.19]; <i>p</i> < .001, d = 0.60), and frequency (geometric mean difference, 0.47, 95% CI [0.29, 0.79]; <i>p</i> = .004) of suicidal intrusions over time than TAU-alone. Cognitive Dual Task Add-on + TAU patients also showed lower suicidal ideation over time (<i>p</i> = .008, <i>d</i> = 0.42). There were no significant group differences in reductions in depressive symptoms, rumination, or hopelessness. Four serious adverse events occurred (three Cognitive Dual Task Add-on + TAU; one TAU-only); all unlikely attributable to intervention/trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide support for the effectiveness of adding a cognitive dual-task module to the treatment of psychiatric outpatients with elevated depressive symptoms in reducing suicidal intrusions and ideation and can be executed safely. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000874","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the safety and efficacy of a brief cognitive dual-task (using eye movements) add-on module to treatment as usual (TAU) in reducing the severity and frequency of intrusive suicidal mental images and suicidal ideation.

Method: We conducted a single-blind, parallel multicenter randomized trial (No. NTR7563) among adult psychiatric outpatients (N = 91; Mage = 34.4, SD = 13.54; 68% female) with elevated depressive symptoms and experiencing distressing suicidal intrusions in the Netherlands. Primary outcome was the severity (Suicidal Intrusions Attributes Scale) and frequency (Clinical Interview for Suicidal Intrusions) of suicidal mental imagery intrusions at 1-week posttreatment and 3-month follow-up. Primary analysis was intention-to-treat.

Results: Between November 27, 2018 and September 13, 2021, 91 patients were included and randomly assigned to intervention group (Cognitive Dual Task Add-on + TAU) (n = 46) or TAU-only (n = 45). Cognitive Dual Task Add-on + TAU had greater reductions in severity (mean difference, -15.50, 95% CI [23.81, -7.19]; p < .001, d = 0.60), and frequency (geometric mean difference, 0.47, 95% CI [0.29, 0.79]; p = .004) of suicidal intrusions over time than TAU-alone. Cognitive Dual Task Add-on + TAU patients also showed lower suicidal ideation over time (p = .008, d = 0.42). There were no significant group differences in reductions in depressive symptoms, rumination, or hopelessness. Four serious adverse events occurred (three Cognitive Dual Task Add-on + TAU; one TAU-only); all unlikely attributable to intervention/trial.

Conclusions: Findings provide support for the effectiveness of adding a cognitive dual-task module to the treatment of psychiatric outpatients with elevated depressive symptoms in reducing suicidal intrusions and ideation and can be executed safely. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

通过双任务附加模块减少抑郁症状患者的侵入性自杀心理图像:多中心随机临床试验结果。
目的研究在常规治疗(TAU)的基础上添加简短的认知双任务(使用眼动)模块,以降低侵入性自杀心理图像和自杀意念的严重程度和频率的安全性和有效性:方法:我们在荷兰对抑郁症状加重并有自杀倾向的成年精神病门诊患者(N = 91;年龄 = 34.4,SD = 13.54;68% 为女性)进行了一项单盲平行多中心随机试验(编号:NTR7563)。主要结果是治疗后一周和随访三个月时自杀意象的严重程度(自杀意象属性量表)和频率(自杀意象临床访谈)。主要分析为意向治疗。结果:2018年11月27日至2021年9月13日期间,91名患者被纳入并随机分配到干预组(认知双重任务插件+TAU)(n = 46)或纯TAU(n = 45)。随着时间的推移,认知双重任务附加装置+TAU比单纯TAU更能降低自杀倾向的严重程度(平均差异为-15.50,95% CI [23.81,-7.19];p < .001,d = 0.60)和频率(几何平均差异为0.47,95% CI [0.29,0.79];p = .004)。随着时间的推移,认知双重任务附加疗法+TAU患者的自杀意念也有所降低(p = .008,d = 0.42)。在抑郁症状、反刍或绝望情绪的减少方面,没有明显的组间差异。发生了四例严重不良事件(三例认知双重任务附加+TAU;一例仅TAU);所有不良事件都不太可能与干预/试验有关:研究结果支持在治疗抑郁症状加重的精神科门诊患者时增加认知双任务模块,以减少自杀念头和意念的有效性,并且可以安全实施。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信