Developing knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire in desmoid tumours (KAPID study): applying e-Delphi to rare diseases.

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
ecancermedicalscience Pub Date : 2024-06-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2024.1715
Ghazal Tansir, Sameer Rastogi, Simran Kaur, Mrinal Gounder, Soumya Muta
{"title":"Developing knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire in desmoid tumours (KAPID study): applying e-Delphi to rare diseases.","authors":"Ghazal Tansir, Sameer Rastogi, Simran Kaur, Mrinal Gounder, Soumya Muta","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2024.1715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rare diseases are associated with unique challenges encountered in diagnosis, treatment and conduct of clinical research. Desmoid tumour (DT) is one such ultra-rare malignancy about which awareness among medical professionals remains limited. We developed a questionnaire to assess knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) among medical professionals on DT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>E-Delphi method was used for the assessment of KAP for DT amongst clinical experts (experience of >/= 3 years in DT). 22 open-ended statements were developed by the core research group using current consensus guidelines. In round 1, experts provided subjective feedback which was incorporated into a 35-item questionnaire. Round 2 entailed experts giving feedback as a 5-point Likert scale classified into agreement (median score >/=4), neutral (median score 3) and disagreement (median score <3). Feedback from Round 2 was incorporated and questions with neutral consensus were modified. Questions in Round 3 achieved consensus if >/= 75% participants agreed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11 (64.7%) of 17 contacted experts responded in Round 1 including 6 (54.4%) who gave additional inputs and 5 (45.6%) who agreed to all statements. In round 2, 8 out of 11 experts responded to the 35-item questionnaire on knowledge (<i>n</i> = 16), attitude (<i>n</i> = 8) and practice (<i>n</i> = 11). 32 questions obtained agreement and 3 (8.5%) had neutral consensus. These were modified for round 3, in which consensus on 2 (66.6%) was attained. The final questionnaire comprises 34 items with 15, 8 and 11 questions on in the sections of knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP), respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1715"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2024.1715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rare diseases are associated with unique challenges encountered in diagnosis, treatment and conduct of clinical research. Desmoid tumour (DT) is one such ultra-rare malignancy about which awareness among medical professionals remains limited. We developed a questionnaire to assess knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) among medical professionals on DT.

Methods: E-Delphi method was used for the assessment of KAP for DT amongst clinical experts (experience of >/= 3 years in DT). 22 open-ended statements were developed by the core research group using current consensus guidelines. In round 1, experts provided subjective feedback which was incorporated into a 35-item questionnaire. Round 2 entailed experts giving feedback as a 5-point Likert scale classified into agreement (median score >/=4), neutral (median score 3) and disagreement (median score <3). Feedback from Round 2 was incorporated and questions with neutral consensus were modified. Questions in Round 3 achieved consensus if >/= 75% participants agreed.

Results: 11 (64.7%) of 17 contacted experts responded in Round 1 including 6 (54.4%) who gave additional inputs and 5 (45.6%) who agreed to all statements. In round 2, 8 out of 11 experts responded to the 35-item questionnaire on knowledge (n = 16), attitude (n = 8) and practice (n = 11). 32 questions obtained agreement and 3 (8.5%) had neutral consensus. These were modified for round 3, in which consensus on 2 (66.6%) was attained. The final questionnaire comprises 34 items with 15, 8 and 11 questions on in the sections of knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP), respectively.

开发类苔藓瘤知识、态度和实践问卷(KAPID 研究):将 e-Delphi 应用于罕见病。
背景:罕见疾病在诊断、治疗和临床研究方面都面临着独特的挑战。蝶形细胞瘤(DT)就是这样一种超罕见恶性肿瘤,医学专业人员对它的认识仍然有限。我们编制了一份调查问卷,以评估医疗专业人员对DT的认识、态度和实践(KAP):采用 E-Delphi 法对临床专家(从事 DT 工作 >/= 3 年)的 DT 知识、态度和实践(KAP)进行评估。在第一轮中,专家们提供了主观反馈,并将其纳入 35 个项目的调查问卷中。第二轮中,专家们以 5 分制李克特量表给出反馈意见,分为同意(中位数>/=4 分)、中立(中位数 3 分)和不同意(中位数 /= 75% 参与者同意):在第一轮中,17 位专家中有 11 位(64.7%)做出了回应,其中 6 位(54.4%)提供了补充意见,5 位(45.6%)同意所有陈述。在第二轮调查中,11 位专家中有 8 位回答了 35 个项目的问卷,涉及知识(16 个)、态度(8 个)和实践(11 个)。32 个问题达成了一致意见,3 个问题(8.5%)达成了中性一致意见。第三轮对这些问题进行了修改,其中 2 个问题(66.6%)达成了共识。最终问卷由 34 个项目组成,知识、态度和实践(KAP)部分分别有 15、8 和 11 个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信