The Burden of symptoms and Quality of life of Filipino patients with Myeloproliferative neoplasm: A Multicenter Cross-sectional survey.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Flordeluna Z Mesina, Teresita E Dumagay, Marissa M Alejandria
{"title":"The Burden of symptoms and Quality of life of Filipino patients with Myeloproliferative neoplasm: A Multicenter Cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Flordeluna Z Mesina, Teresita E Dumagay, Marissa M Alejandria","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are hematologic malignancies characterized by cellular proliferation of one or more hematopoietic cell lines. Management has been focused on blood count control but addressing relief from symptoms and providing a better quality of life (QOL) are equally important in the care of these patients. The MPN Symptom Assessment Form-Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS) is used to determine symptoms at baseline and during treatment. Understanding the symptom burden is important in developing a holistic management plan for MPN. Hence, this study aimed to determine the symptom burden and QOL of Filipino patients with MPN.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Using a validated Filipino version of the MPN-SAF-TSS questionnaire and the University of the Philippines-Department of Health QOL (UP-DOH QOL) questionnaire, a cross-sectional survey of consecutive patients with MPN from two public and two private tertiary hospitals was conducted. We purposively sampled adults, newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed with polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), or myelofibrosis (MF). The mean scores were compared with the type of MPN using analysis of variance. Linear regression was done to determine the association of patients' characteristics to the mean symptom burden and QOL scores, while logistic regression was used to determine the association of patient and disease characteristics with the level of symptom severity and QOL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 167 (63 PV, 66 ET, and 38 MF) patients were surveyed from four centers. The mean overall symptom burden score was 24.41 (standard deviation [SD] = 18.91) with MF having the highest score at 28.53, followed by PV at 23.75 and ET at 22.67. The majority (80.24%) had a high QOL with a mean global QoL score of 84.92 (SD = 16.75). Comparison of individual scores showed bone pain and weight loss were significantly higher in patients with MF compared to PV (p = 0.0002) and ET (p = 0.032); while pruritus was significantly higher in PV compared to ET and MF (p = 0.043). Logistic regression analysis showed female sex and being newly diagnosed (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 11.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.32-54.25) were associated with high symptom burden while having a controlled blood count (aOR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.71) was associated with low symptom burden and high QOL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of the participants were symptomatic with moderate to severe symptom burden. While no statistically significant difference was seen among the three types of MPN in terms of overall mean symptom score, patients with MF were more likely to have a severe symptom burden while patients with ET had the least symptoms. Despite having symptoms, QOL was regarded as high. QoL was significantly higher among those with PV or ET than those with MF. Our study highlighted the utility of a validated symptom scoring system in determining the symptom burden and who would benefit from pharmacologic/non-pharmacologic symptom management. Results emphasized incorporating symptom scoring in clinical practice and going beyond blood counts in caring for our patients with MPN.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are hematologic malignancies characterized by cellular proliferation of one or more hematopoietic cell lines. Management has been focused on blood count control but addressing relief from symptoms and providing a better quality of life (QOL) are equally important in the care of these patients. The MPN Symptom Assessment Form-Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS) is used to determine symptoms at baseline and during treatment. Understanding the symptom burden is important in developing a holistic management plan for MPN. Hence, this study aimed to determine the symptom burden and QOL of Filipino patients with MPN.

Methodology: Using a validated Filipino version of the MPN-SAF-TSS questionnaire and the University of the Philippines-Department of Health QOL (UP-DOH QOL) questionnaire, a cross-sectional survey of consecutive patients with MPN from two public and two private tertiary hospitals was conducted. We purposively sampled adults, newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed with polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), or myelofibrosis (MF). The mean scores were compared with the type of MPN using analysis of variance. Linear regression was done to determine the association of patients' characteristics to the mean symptom burden and QOL scores, while logistic regression was used to determine the association of patient and disease characteristics with the level of symptom severity and QOL.

Results: A total of 167 (63 PV, 66 ET, and 38 MF) patients were surveyed from four centers. The mean overall symptom burden score was 24.41 (standard deviation [SD] = 18.91) with MF having the highest score at 28.53, followed by PV at 23.75 and ET at 22.67. The majority (80.24%) had a high QOL with a mean global QoL score of 84.92 (SD = 16.75). Comparison of individual scores showed bone pain and weight loss were significantly higher in patients with MF compared to PV (p = 0.0002) and ET (p = 0.032); while pruritus was significantly higher in PV compared to ET and MF (p = 0.043). Logistic regression analysis showed female sex and being newly diagnosed (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 11.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.32-54.25) were associated with high symptom burden while having a controlled blood count (aOR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.71) was associated with low symptom burden and high QOL.

Conclusion: The majority of the participants were symptomatic with moderate to severe symptom burden. While no statistically significant difference was seen among the three types of MPN in terms of overall mean symptom score, patients with MF were more likely to have a severe symptom burden while patients with ET had the least symptoms. Despite having symptoms, QOL was regarded as high. QoL was significantly higher among those with PV or ET than those with MF. Our study highlighted the utility of a validated symptom scoring system in determining the symptom burden and who would benefit from pharmacologic/non-pharmacologic symptom management. Results emphasized incorporating symptom scoring in clinical practice and going beyond blood counts in caring for our patients with MPN.

菲律宾骨髓增生性肿瘤患者的症状负担和生活质量:一项多中心横断面调查。
背景:骨髓增生性肿瘤(MPN)是以一种或多种造血细胞系的细胞增殖为特征的血液系统恶性肿瘤。治疗的重点是控制血细胞计数,但缓解症状和提高生活质量(QOL)对这些患者的治疗同样重要。MPN 症状评估表-症状总评分(MPN-SAF TSS)用于确定基线和治疗期间的症状。了解症状负担对于制定 MPN 整体管理计划非常重要。因此,本研究旨在确定菲律宾 MPN 患者的症状负担和 QOL:使用经过验证的菲律宾语版 MPN-SAF-TSS 问卷和菲律宾大学卫生部 QOL(UP-DOH QOL)问卷,对两家公立和两家私立三级医院的连续 MPN 患者进行了横断面调查。我们有目的地抽取了新诊断或既往诊断为真性红细胞增多症(PV)、原发性血小板增多症(ET)或骨髓纤维化(MF)的成人患者。采用方差分析法将平均得分与多发性骨髓瘤的类型进行比较。线性回归用于确定患者特征与平均症状负担和 QOL 评分的关系,逻辑回归用于确定患者和疾病特征与症状严重程度和 QOL 的关系:四个中心共调查了 167 名(63 名 PV、66 名 ET 和 38 名 MF)患者。总症状负担平均得分为 24.41(标准差 [SD] = 18.91),其中 MF 得分最高,为 28.53,其次是 PV,为 23.75,ET 为 22.67。大多数患者(80.24%)的 QoL 较高,平均总体 QoL 得分为 84.92(标准差 [SD] = 16.75)。单项评分比较显示,MF 患者的骨痛和体重减轻明显高于 PV(P = 0.0002)和 ET(P = 0.032);而 PV 患者的瘙痒明显高于 ET 和 MF(P = 0.043)。逻辑回归分析显示,女性和新确诊(调整赔率[aOR]11.22,95% 置信区间[CI]2.32-54.25)与高症状负担相关,而血细胞计数得到控制(aOR 0.26,95% CI 0.10-0.71)与低症状负担和高 QOL 相关:结论:大多数参与者都有中度至重度症状。虽然三种类型的骨髓增生性疾病患者在症状总平均得分方面没有明显的统计学差异,但骨髓纤维化患者更有可能有严重的症状负担,而ET患者的症状最少。尽管有症状,但患者的生活质量仍被认为很高。PV或ET患者的QoL明显高于MF患者。我们的研究强调了经过验证的症状评分系统在确定症状负担以及谁将从药物/非药物症状管理中获益方面的作用。研究结果强调将症状评分纳入临床实践,并在护理 MPN 患者时不局限于血细胞计数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信