Optical Marker-Based Motion Capture of the Human Spine: A Scoping Review of Study Design and Outcomes

IF 3 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Claudia F. Romero-Flores, Rogelio Bustamante-Bello, Marcos Moya Bencomo, Erick Axel Martinez-Ríos, Luis Montesinos
{"title":"Optical Marker-Based Motion Capture of the Human Spine: A Scoping Review of Study Design and Outcomes","authors":"Claudia F. Romero-Flores,&nbsp;Rogelio Bustamante-Bello,&nbsp;Marcos Moya Bencomo,&nbsp;Erick Axel Martinez-Ríos,&nbsp;Luis Montesinos","doi":"10.1007/s10439-024-03567-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biomechanical analysis of the human spine is crucial to understanding injury patterns. Motion capture technology has gained attention due to its non-invasive nature. Nevertheless, traditional motion capture studies consider the spine a single rigid segment, although its alignment changes during movement. Moreover, guidelines that indicate where markers should be placed for a specific exercise do not exist. This study aims to review the methods used to assess spine biomechanics using motion capture systems to determine the marker sets used, the protocols used, the resulting parameters, the analysed activities, and the characteristics of the studied populations. PRISMA guidelines were used to perform a Scoping Review using SCOPUS and Web of Science databases. Fifty-six journal and conference articles from 1997 to 2023 were considered for the analysis. This review showed that Plug-in-Gait is the most used marker set. The lumbar spine is the segment that generates the most interest because of its high mobility and function as a weight supporter. Furthermore, angular position and velocity are the most common outcomes when studying the spine. Walking, standing, and range of movement were the most studied activities compared to sports and work-related activities. Male and female participants were recruited similarly across all included articles. This review presents the motion capture techniques and measurement outcomes of biomechanical studies of the human spine, to help standardize the field. This work also discusses trends in marker sets, study outcomes, studied segments and segmentation approaches.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><img></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":"52 9","pages":"2373 - 2387"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11329589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10439-024-03567-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biomechanical analysis of the human spine is crucial to understanding injury patterns. Motion capture technology has gained attention due to its non-invasive nature. Nevertheless, traditional motion capture studies consider the spine a single rigid segment, although its alignment changes during movement. Moreover, guidelines that indicate where markers should be placed for a specific exercise do not exist. This study aims to review the methods used to assess spine biomechanics using motion capture systems to determine the marker sets used, the protocols used, the resulting parameters, the analysed activities, and the characteristics of the studied populations. PRISMA guidelines were used to perform a Scoping Review using SCOPUS and Web of Science databases. Fifty-six journal and conference articles from 1997 to 2023 were considered for the analysis. This review showed that Plug-in-Gait is the most used marker set. The lumbar spine is the segment that generates the most interest because of its high mobility and function as a weight supporter. Furthermore, angular position and velocity are the most common outcomes when studying the spine. Walking, standing, and range of movement were the most studied activities compared to sports and work-related activities. Male and female participants were recruited similarly across all included articles. This review presents the motion capture techniques and measurement outcomes of biomechanical studies of the human spine, to help standardize the field. This work also discusses trends in marker sets, study outcomes, studied segments and segmentation approaches.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

基于光学标记的人体脊柱运动捕捉:研究设计与结果范围综述》。
人体脊柱的生物力学分析对于了解损伤模式至关重要。运动捕捉技术因其非侵入性而备受关注。然而,传统的运动捕捉研究将脊柱视为单一的刚性节段,尽管其排列在运动过程中会发生变化。此外,并不存在针对特定运动应在何处放置标记的指导原则。本研究旨在回顾使用运动捕捉系统评估脊柱生物力学的方法,以确定使用的标记集、使用的方案、得出的参数、分析的活动以及研究人群的特征。在使用 SCOPUS 和 Web of Science 数据库进行范围界定审查时,采用了 PRISMA 指南。分析中考虑了 1997 年至 2023 年的 56 篇期刊和会议文章。综述显示,Plug-in-Gait 是最常用的标记集。腰椎是最受关注的节段,因为腰椎的活动度大,具有承重功能。此外,角度位置和速度是研究脊柱时最常见的结果。与运动和工作相关活动相比,步行、站立和活动范围是研究最多的活动。在所有收录的文章中,男性和女性参与者的招募情况相似。本综述介绍了人体脊柱生物力学研究的运动捕捉技术和测量结果,以帮助实现该领域的标准化。这项工作还讨论了标记集、研究结果、研究区段和分割方法的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信