Comparison of Drug Therapy Efficacy in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Network Meta-Analysis

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Erhan Shang, Hongmei Tan PhD
{"title":"Comparison of Drug Therapy Efficacy in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Network Meta-Analysis","authors":"Erhan Shang,&nbsp;Hongmei Tan PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of various commonly used drugs in treating patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Randomized controlled trials on drugs for HCM treatment were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (search cutoff: January 10, 2024). Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias tool, and data analysis used R software. Seventeen studies (1,133 patients with HCM) were included. The network meta-analysis indicated that mavacamten and perhexiline improved peak oxygen consumption compared with placebo. Mavacamten reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, left ventricular mass index, left atrial volume index, and septal E/e′ ratio. Losartan decreased systolic blood pressure, whereas candesartan, mavacamten, and valsartan reduced maximum wall thickness. Perhexiline had better efficacy in increasing peak oxygen consumption, and candesartan in reducing maximum wall thickness. No drug significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction compared with placebo. In conclusion, on the basis of current studies, commonly used drugs may effectively improve some of the outcome measures in patients with HCM, whereas the novel drug mavacamten showed significant therapeutic effects in most of the remaining outcome measures except for left ventricular ejection fraction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924005137/pdfft?md5=a3fb8e1cc18fb7a2538a18897947eefd&pid=1-s2.0-S0002914924005137-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924005137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of various commonly used drugs in treating patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Randomized controlled trials on drugs for HCM treatment were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (search cutoff: January 10, 2024). Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias tool, and data analysis used R software. Seventeen studies (1,133 patients with HCM) were included. The network meta-analysis indicated that mavacamten and perhexiline improved peak oxygen consumption compared with placebo. Mavacamten reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, left ventricular mass index, left atrial volume index, and septal E/e′ ratio. Losartan decreased systolic blood pressure, whereas candesartan, mavacamten, and valsartan reduced maximum wall thickness. Perhexiline had better efficacy in increasing peak oxygen consumption, and candesartan in reducing maximum wall thickness. No drug significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction compared with placebo. In conclusion, on the basis of current studies, commonly used drugs may effectively improve some of the outcome measures in patients with HCM, whereas the novel drug mavacamten showed significant therapeutic effects in most of the remaining outcome measures except for left ventricular ejection fraction.

肥厚型心肌病患者的药物疗效比较:网络 Meta 分析
本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在比较各种常用药物在治疗肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者方面的疗效。从 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 中检索了有关治疗肥厚型心肌病药物的随机对照试验(检索截止日期:2024 年 1 月 10 日)。使用偏倚风险工具进行质量评估,并使用 R 软件进行数据分析。共纳入 17 篇文章(1133 名 HCM 患者)。NMA表明,与安慰剂相比,马伐康坦和哌西林可改善峰值氧耗量(pVO2)。马伐康坦可降低 N 端前 B 型钠尿肽(NT-pro-BNP)、左心室质量指数(LVMI)、左心房容积指数(LAVI)和室间隔 E/e' 比值。洛沙坦能降低收缩压,而坎地沙坦、马伐沙坦和缬沙坦能降低最大室壁厚度。培合西林对提高 pVO2 有更好的疗效,而坎地沙坦则对降低最大室壁厚度有更好的疗效。与安慰剂相比,没有一种药物能明显改善左心室射血分数(LVEF)。总之,根据目前的研究,常用药物可有效改善 HCM 患者的部分预后指标,而新型药物马伐卡坦对除 LVEF 外的其余大部分预后指标均有显著疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信