Impact of frailty index on cardiovascular outcomes and readmissions of patent foramen ovale closure procedure: a propensity matched national analysis.

IF 1.3
American journal of cardiovascular disease Pub Date : 2024-06-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/PTMD5117
Saliha Erdem, Amro Taha, Neel Patel, Dhruvil Ashishkumar Patel, Anoop Titus, Khaled M Harmouch, Yasemin Bahar, Sanchit Duhan, Bijeta Keisham, Moinuddin Syed, Juan Carlo Avalon, Yasar Sattar, M Chadi Alraies
{"title":"Impact of frailty index on cardiovascular outcomes and readmissions of patent foramen ovale closure procedure: a propensity matched national analysis.","authors":"Saliha Erdem, Amro Taha, Neel Patel, Dhruvil Ashishkumar Patel, Anoop Titus, Khaled M Harmouch, Yasemin Bahar, Sanchit Duhan, Bijeta Keisham, Moinuddin Syed, Juan Carlo Avalon, Yasar Sattar, M Chadi Alraies","doi":"10.62347/PTMD5117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder device is a procedure mostly performed to prevent secondary stroke as a result of paradoxical emboli traversing an intracardiac defect into the systemic circulation. The complications and outcomes following the procedure remain poorly studied. We aimed to investigate morbidity and mortality associated with occluder device procedures using hospital frailty index score stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Nationwide Readmission Database was employed to identify patients admitted for PFO closure from 2016 to 2020. Two groups divided by index frailty score were compared to report adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for primary and secondary cardiovascular outcomes. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury, acute ischemic stroke, and post-procedure bleeding. Statistical analysis was performed using <i>STATA v.17</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,063 total patients who underwent the procedure, 45% possessed intermediate to high frailty scores while the other 55% had low frailty scores. The first cohort had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 6.3, 95% CI 2.05-19.5), acute kidney injury (aOR 17.6, 95% CI 9.5-32.5), and stroke (aOR 3.05, 95% CI 1.5-5.8) than the second cohort. There was no difference in the incidence of post-procedural bleeding and cardiac tamponade and 30/90/180-day readmission rates between the two cohorts. Hospitalizations in the first cohort were associated with a higher median length of stay and total cost.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High to intermediate frailty scores may predict an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing PFO occluder device procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":7427,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/PTMD5117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder device is a procedure mostly performed to prevent secondary stroke as a result of paradoxical emboli traversing an intracardiac defect into the systemic circulation. The complications and outcomes following the procedure remain poorly studied. We aimed to investigate morbidity and mortality associated with occluder device procedures using hospital frailty index score stratification.

Methods: The Nationwide Readmission Database was employed to identify patients admitted for PFO closure from 2016 to 2020. Two groups divided by index frailty score were compared to report adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for primary and secondary cardiovascular outcomes. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury, acute ischemic stroke, and post-procedure bleeding. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA v.17.

Results: Of the 2,063 total patients who underwent the procedure, 45% possessed intermediate to high frailty scores while the other 55% had low frailty scores. The first cohort had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 6.3, 95% CI 2.05-19.5), acute kidney injury (aOR 17.6, 95% CI 9.5-32.5), and stroke (aOR 3.05, 95% CI 1.5-5.8) than the second cohort. There was no difference in the incidence of post-procedural bleeding and cardiac tamponade and 30/90/180-day readmission rates between the two cohorts. Hospitalizations in the first cohort were associated with a higher median length of stay and total cost.

Conclusion: High to intermediate frailty scores may predict an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing PFO occluder device procedures.

虚弱指数对心血管预后和卵圆孔闭合术再住院的影响:倾向匹配全国分析。
背景:经导管卵圆孔(PFO)封堵器是一种手术,主要用于预防矛盾性栓子穿越心内缺损进入体循环而导致的继发性中风。有关该手术的并发症和结果的研究仍然很少。我们旨在利用医院虚弱指数评分分层法研究与闭塞器手术相关的发病率和死亡率:方法:采用全国再入院数据库来识别 2016 年至 2020 年期间因 PFO 闭合而入院的患者。对按虚弱指数评分划分的两组患者进行比较,以报告主要和次要心血管结局的调整几率比(aOR)。结果包括院内死亡率、急性肾损伤、急性缺血性卒中和术后出血。统计分析使用 STATA v.17 进行:在接受手术的 2,063 名患者中,45% 的患者拥有中度至高度虚弱评分,而另外 55% 的患者拥有低度虚弱评分。第一组患者的院内死亡率(aOR 6.3,95% CI 2.05-19.5)、急性肾损伤(aOR 17.6,95% CI 9.5-32.5)和中风(aOR 3.05,95% CI 1.5-5.8)发生率高于第二组。两个队列的术后出血和心脏填塞发生率以及 30/90/180 天再入院率没有差异。第一组住院患者的中位住院时间和总费用较高:结论:高至中等体弱评分可预测接受 PFO 闭塞装置手术的患者院内死亡风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of cardiovascular disease
American journal of cardiovascular disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信