Association of economic and racial segregation with restricted buprenorphine dispensing in U.S. community pharmacies

Kyle J. Moon , Sabriya L. Linton , Neda J. Kazerouni , Ximena A. Levander , Adriane N. Irwin , Daniel M. Hartung
{"title":"Association of economic and racial segregation with restricted buprenorphine dispensing in U.S. community pharmacies","authors":"Kyle J. Moon ,&nbsp;Sabriya L. Linton ,&nbsp;Neda J. Kazerouni ,&nbsp;Ximena A. Levander ,&nbsp;Adriane N. Irwin ,&nbsp;Daniel M. Hartung","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Timely and reliable dispensing of buprenorphine is critical to accessing treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Racial and ethnic inequities in OUD treatment access are well described, but it remains unclear if inequities persist at the point of dispensing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed data from a U.S. telephone audit that measured restricted buprenorphine dispensing in community pharmacies, defined as inability to fill a buprenorphine prescription requested by a “secret shopper.” Using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), we constructed county-level measures of racial, ethnic, economic, and racialized economic (joint racial and economic segregation) segregation. Logistic regression models evaluated the association of ICE measures and restricted buprenorphine dispensing, adjusting for county type (urban vs. rural) and pharmacy type (chain vs. independent).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 858 pharmacies surveyed in 473 counties, pharmacies in the most ethnically segregated and economically deprived counties had 2.66 times the odds (95 % CI: 1.41, 5.17) of restricting buprenorphine dispensing, compared to pharmacies in the most privileged counties after adjustment. Pharmacies in counties with high racialized economic segregation (quintile 2 and 3) also had higher odds of restricting buprenorphine dispensing (aOR 3.09 [95 % CI 1.7, 5.59]; aOR 2.11 [95 % CI 1.17, 3.98]). Similar associations were observed for economic segregation (aOR: 2.18 [95 % CI: 1.21, 3.99]), but not ethnic (0.59 [0.34, 1.05]) or racial (0.61 [0.35, 1.07]) segregation alone.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Restricted buprenorphine dispensing was most pronounced in socially and economically disadvantaged communities, potentially exacerbating gaps in OUD treatment access. Policy interventions should target both prescribing and dispensing capacity to advance pharmacoequity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000398/pdfft?md5=36e0c271c0d6d4c2e784e8baa8ac8011&pid=1-s2.0-S2772724624000398-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Timely and reliable dispensing of buprenorphine is critical to accessing treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Racial and ethnic inequities in OUD treatment access are well described, but it remains unclear if inequities persist at the point of dispensing.

Methods

We analyzed data from a U.S. telephone audit that measured restricted buprenorphine dispensing in community pharmacies, defined as inability to fill a buprenorphine prescription requested by a “secret shopper.” Using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), we constructed county-level measures of racial, ethnic, economic, and racialized economic (joint racial and economic segregation) segregation. Logistic regression models evaluated the association of ICE measures and restricted buprenorphine dispensing, adjusting for county type (urban vs. rural) and pharmacy type (chain vs. independent).

Results

Among 858 pharmacies surveyed in 473 counties, pharmacies in the most ethnically segregated and economically deprived counties had 2.66 times the odds (95 % CI: 1.41, 5.17) of restricting buprenorphine dispensing, compared to pharmacies in the most privileged counties after adjustment. Pharmacies in counties with high racialized economic segregation (quintile 2 and 3) also had higher odds of restricting buprenorphine dispensing (aOR 3.09 [95 % CI 1.7, 5.59]; aOR 2.11 [95 % CI 1.17, 3.98]). Similar associations were observed for economic segregation (aOR: 2.18 [95 % CI: 1.21, 3.99]), but not ethnic (0.59 [0.34, 1.05]) or racial (0.61 [0.35, 1.07]) segregation alone.

Conclusions

Restricted buprenorphine dispensing was most pronounced in socially and economically disadvantaged communities, potentially exacerbating gaps in OUD treatment access. Policy interventions should target both prescribing and dispensing capacity to advance pharmacoequity.

经济和种族隔离与美国社区药房限制丁丙诺啡配药的关系
背景及时可靠地发放丁丙诺啡对于获得阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)治疗至关重要。我们分析了来自美国电话审计的数据,该审计测量了社区药房受限丁丙诺啡的配药情况,社区药房受限丁丙诺啡是指无法配制 "秘密顾客 "要求的丁丙诺啡处方。利用极端集中指数(ICE),我们构建了县一级的种族、民族、经济和种族化经济(种族和经济联合隔离)隔离措施。结果在接受调查的 473 个县的 858 家药房中,经调整后,种族隔离最严重和经济最贫困县的药房限制丁丙诺啡配药的几率是条件最优越县药房的 2.66 倍(95 % CI:1.41, 5.17)。种族经济高度隔离县(五分位数 2 和 3)的药房限制丁丙诺啡配药的几率也更高(aOR 3.09 [95 % CI 1.7, 5.59];aOR 2.11 [95 % CI 1.17, 3.98])。在经济隔离(aOR:2.18 [95 % CI:1.21, 3.99])方面也观察到类似的关联,但仅在种族(0.59 [0.34, 1.05])或民族(0.61 [0.35, 1.07])隔离方面则没有观察到。政策干预应同时针对处方和配药能力,以促进药物公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence reports
Drug and alcohol dependence reports Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
100 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信