Thomas Baker , Matthias van Hall , Paul Nieuwbeerta , Anja J.E. Dirkzwager
{"title":"Examining procedural justice spill-over effects on in-prison misconduct","authors":"Thomas Baker , Matthias van Hall , Paul Nieuwbeerta , Anja J.E. Dirkzwager","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The goal of this study is to evaluate the potential spill-over of police procedural justice perceptions onto perceptions of prison staff procedural justice and assess the impact of this spill-over on prison misconduct.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study uses data from the Prison Project a longitudinal panel study collected in the Netherlands. The analytic sample included 730 participants. We use structural equation modeling to assess the direct and indirect effects of perceptions of police procedural justice on in-prison misconduct (self-reported and official) mediated by prison staff procedural justice.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Perceptions of police procedural justice are significantly and positively associated with prison staff procedural justice and significantly, negatively, and indirectly associated with prison misconduct through perceptions of prison staff procedural justice. Prison staff procedural justice is significantly and negatively associated with official and self-reported misconduct.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Police procedural justice may have lingering effects on the behavior of people who encounter law enforcement. While prison staff may be able to affect prison misconduct through just procedures, they may benefit or suffer from the impact of people's prior criminal justice experiences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 102228"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235224000771","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
The goal of this study is to evaluate the potential spill-over of police procedural justice perceptions onto perceptions of prison staff procedural justice and assess the impact of this spill-over on prison misconduct.
Methods
This study uses data from the Prison Project a longitudinal panel study collected in the Netherlands. The analytic sample included 730 participants. We use structural equation modeling to assess the direct and indirect effects of perceptions of police procedural justice on in-prison misconduct (self-reported and official) mediated by prison staff procedural justice.
Results
Perceptions of police procedural justice are significantly and positively associated with prison staff procedural justice and significantly, negatively, and indirectly associated with prison misconduct through perceptions of prison staff procedural justice. Prison staff procedural justice is significantly and negatively associated with official and self-reported misconduct.
Conclusions
Police procedural justice may have lingering effects on the behavior of people who encounter law enforcement. While prison staff may be able to affect prison misconduct through just procedures, they may benefit or suffer from the impact of people's prior criminal justice experiences.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest.
Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.