The Chinese version of the multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory short form (MPFI-24): Assessment of psychometric properties using classical test theory and network analysis

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Shuanghu Fang, Mingjie Huang, Dongyan Ding, Qilin Zheng
{"title":"The Chinese version of the multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory short form (MPFI-24): Assessment of psychometric properties using classical test theory and network analysis","authors":"Shuanghu Fang,&nbsp;Mingjie Huang,&nbsp;Dongyan Ding,&nbsp;Qilin Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to validate the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (<em>C</em>-MPFI-24) for use in China, taking into account cultural differences, using classical test theory and network analysis. Participants were Chinese university students, middle school students, university teachers, and medical professionals, totaling 3568 valid respondents from an initial pool of 3800. A retest was conducted one month later with 350 university students. The inventory was analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, linear regression, and network analysis. Results showed that the two higher-order factors of the <em>C</em>-MPFI-24, psychological flexibility and inflexibility, fit well (<em>χ2</em> = 1726.36, <em>df</em> = 239, CFI = 0.936, RMSEA = 0.067), with a significant negative correlation between them (−0.72). Correlation with related scales confirmed good convergent validity, and network analysis supported the robustness of the model. Linear regression indicated that the subscales of the <em>C</em>-MPFI-24 significantly explained variance in well-being and distress beyond that of the AAQ-II. The inventory demonstrated good reliability, test-retest stability, and measurement invariance across groups and genders, establishing its reliability and applicability for assessing psychological flexibility and inflexibility in a Chinese context. Further research is encouraged to examine its cross-cultural stability and applicability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (C-MPFI-24) for use in China, taking into account cultural differences, using classical test theory and network analysis. Participants were Chinese university students, middle school students, university teachers, and medical professionals, totaling 3568 valid respondents from an initial pool of 3800. A retest was conducted one month later with 350 university students. The inventory was analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, linear regression, and network analysis. Results showed that the two higher-order factors of the C-MPFI-24, psychological flexibility and inflexibility, fit well (χ2 = 1726.36, df = 239, CFI = 0.936, RMSEA = 0.067), with a significant negative correlation between them (−0.72). Correlation with related scales confirmed good convergent validity, and network analysis supported the robustness of the model. Linear regression indicated that the subscales of the C-MPFI-24 significantly explained variance in well-being and distress beyond that of the AAQ-II. The inventory demonstrated good reliability, test-retest stability, and measurement invariance across groups and genders, establishing its reliability and applicability for assessing psychological flexibility and inflexibility in a Chinese context. Further research is encouraged to examine its cross-cultural stability and applicability.

中文版多维心理弹性量表简表(MPFI-24):运用经典测验理论和网络分析评估心理测量学特性
本研究的目的是运用经典测验理论和网络分析法,在考虑文化差异的基础上,验证中文版多维心理弹性量表(C-MPFI-24)在中国的使用效果。被试包括中国大学生、中学生、大学教师和医务人员,从最初的 3800 名被试中选出了 3568 名有效被试。一个月后,对 350 名大学生进行了复测。采用确认性因素分析、相关分析、线性回归和网络分析等方法对问卷进行了分析。结果表明,C-MPFI-24 的两个高阶因子--心理灵活性和不灵活性--拟合良好(χ2 = 1726.36,df = 239,CFI = 0.936,RMSEA = 0.067),它们之间存在显著的负相关(-0.72)。与相关量表的相关性证实了该模型具有良好的收敛效度,网络分析也证明了该模型的稳健性。线性回归结果表明,C-MPFI-24 的子量表对幸福感和痛苦的解释能力明显高于 AAQ-II。该量表在不同群体和性别之间表现出良好的可靠性、重测稳定性和测量不变性,从而确立了其在中国背景下评估心理灵活性和不灵活性的可靠性和适用性。我们鼓励进一步研究其跨文化稳定性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信