{"title":"Safety assessment for autonomous vehicles: A reference driver model for highway merging scenarios","authors":"Cheng Wang , Fengwei Guo , Shuaijie Zhao , Zhongpan Zhu , Yuxin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Driver models are crucial for the safety assessment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) because of their role as reference models. Specifically, an AV is expected to achieve at least the same level of safety performance as a careful and competent driver model. To make this comparison possible, quantitative modeling of careful and competent driver models is essential. Thus, the UNECE Regulation No. 157 proposes two driver models as benchmarks for AVs, enabling safety assessment of AV longitudinal behaviors. However, these two driver models are unable to be applied in non-car-following scenarios, limiting their applications in scenarios such as highway merging. To this end, we propose a careful and competent driver model for highway merging (CCDM2) scenarios using interpretable reinforcement learning-based decision-making and safety constraint control. We compare our model’s safe driving capabilities with human drivers in challenging merging scenarios and demonstrate the ”careful” and ”competent” characteristics of our model while ensuring its interpretability. The results indicate the model’s capability to handle merging scenarios with even better safety performance than human drivers. This model is of great value for AV safety assessment in merging scenarios and contributes to future reference driver models to be included in AV safety regulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 107710"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524002550","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Driver models are crucial for the safety assessment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) because of their role as reference models. Specifically, an AV is expected to achieve at least the same level of safety performance as a careful and competent driver model. To make this comparison possible, quantitative modeling of careful and competent driver models is essential. Thus, the UNECE Regulation No. 157 proposes two driver models as benchmarks for AVs, enabling safety assessment of AV longitudinal behaviors. However, these two driver models are unable to be applied in non-car-following scenarios, limiting their applications in scenarios such as highway merging. To this end, we propose a careful and competent driver model for highway merging (CCDM2) scenarios using interpretable reinforcement learning-based decision-making and safety constraint control. We compare our model’s safe driving capabilities with human drivers in challenging merging scenarios and demonstrate the ”careful” and ”competent” characteristics of our model while ensuring its interpretability. The results indicate the model’s capability to handle merging scenarios with even better safety performance than human drivers. This model is of great value for AV safety assessment in merging scenarios and contributes to future reference driver models to be included in AV safety regulations.
期刊介绍:
Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.