Effectiveness, acceptability, and potential of lay student vaccinators to improve vaccine delivery.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ryan Yee, Cécile Raymond, Meredith Strong, Lori Seeton, Akash Kothari, Victor Lo, Emma-Cole McCubbin, Alexandra Kubica, Anna Subic, Anna Taddio, Mohammed Mall, Sheikh Noor Ul Amin, Monique Martin, Aaron M Orkin
{"title":"Effectiveness, acceptability, and potential of lay student vaccinators to improve vaccine delivery.","authors":"Ryan Yee, Cécile Raymond, Meredith Strong, Lori Seeton, Akash Kothari, Victor Lo, Emma-Cole McCubbin, Alexandra Kubica, Anna Subic, Anna Taddio, Mohammed Mall, Sheikh Noor Ul Amin, Monique Martin, Aaron M Orkin","doi":"10.17269/s41997-024-00909-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Setting: </strong>Task sharing can fill health workforce gaps, improve access to care, and enhance health equity by redistributing health services to providers with less training. We report learnings from a demonstration project designed to assess whether lay student vaccinators can support community immunizations.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Between July 2022 and February 2023, 27 undergraduate and graduate students were recruited from the University of Toronto Emergency First Responders organization and operated 11 immunization clinics under professional supervision. Medical directives, supported with online and in-person training, enabled lay providers to administer and document vaccinations when supervised by nurses, physicians, or pharmacists. Participants were invited to complete a voluntary online survey to comment on their experience.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Lay providers administered 293 influenza and COVID-19 vaccines without adverse events. A total of 141 participants (122 patients, 17 lay vaccinators, 1 nurse, and 1 physician) responded to our survey. More than 80% of patients strongly agreed to feeling safe and comfortable with lay providers administering vaccines under supervision, had no concerns with lay vaccinators, and would attend another lay vaccinator clinic. Content and thematic analysis of open-text responses revealed predominantly positive experiences, with themes about excellent vaccinators, organized and efficient clinics, and the importance of training, communication, and access to regulated professionals. The responding providers expressed comfort working in collaborative immunization teams.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Lay student providers can deliver vaccines safely under a medical directive while potentially improving patient experiences. Rather than redeploying scarce professionals, task sharing strategies could position trained lay vaccinators to support immunizations, improve access, and foster community engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":51407,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-024-00909-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Setting: Task sharing can fill health workforce gaps, improve access to care, and enhance health equity by redistributing health services to providers with less training. We report learnings from a demonstration project designed to assess whether lay student vaccinators can support community immunizations.

Intervention: Between July 2022 and February 2023, 27 undergraduate and graduate students were recruited from the University of Toronto Emergency First Responders organization and operated 11 immunization clinics under professional supervision. Medical directives, supported with online and in-person training, enabled lay providers to administer and document vaccinations when supervised by nurses, physicians, or pharmacists. Participants were invited to complete a voluntary online survey to comment on their experience.

Outcomes: Lay providers administered 293 influenza and COVID-19 vaccines without adverse events. A total of 141 participants (122 patients, 17 lay vaccinators, 1 nurse, and 1 physician) responded to our survey. More than 80% of patients strongly agreed to feeling safe and comfortable with lay providers administering vaccines under supervision, had no concerns with lay vaccinators, and would attend another lay vaccinator clinic. Content and thematic analysis of open-text responses revealed predominantly positive experiences, with themes about excellent vaccinators, organized and efficient clinics, and the importance of training, communication, and access to regulated professionals. The responding providers expressed comfort working in collaborative immunization teams.

Implications: Lay student providers can deliver vaccines safely under a medical directive while potentially improving patient experiences. Rather than redeploying scarce professionals, task sharing strategies could position trained lay vaccinators to support immunizations, improve access, and foster community engagement.

非专业学生疫苗接种员的有效性、可接受性和改善疫苗接种的潜力。
背景:任务分担可以填补医疗卫生人员的缺口,改善医疗服务的可及性,并通过将医疗服务重新分配给培训较少的医疗服务提供者来提高医疗公平性。我们报告了一个示范项目的经验,该项目旨在评估非专业学生疫苗接种员能否支持社区免疫接种:干预措施:2022 年 7 月至 2023 年 2 月期间,从多伦多大学急救人员组织招募了 27 名本科生和研究生,在专业人员的监督下开设了 11 家免疫诊所。通过在线和现场培训,医疗指令使非专业医疗人员能够在护士、医生或药剂师的监督下实施和记录疫苗接种。我们邀请参与者自愿完成在线调查,对他们的经验发表评论:非专业人员接种了 293 支流感疫苗和 COVID-19 疫苗,未发生不良事件。共有 141 名参与者(122 名患者、17 名非专业疫苗接种者、1 名护士和 1 名医生)回复了我们的调查。超过 80% 的患者强烈同意在非专业人员的监督下接种疫苗,并对其感到安全和舒适,对非专业疫苗接种人员没有任何顾虑,并愿意参加下一次非专业疫苗接种人员诊所。对开放文本回复的内容和主题分析表明,他们的经历主要是积极的,主题包括优秀的疫苗接种人员、有组织且高效的诊所,以及培训、沟通和接触受监管专业人员的重要性。答复的医疗服务提供者表示,在合作性免疫团队中工作很轻松:影响:校外学生医疗服务提供者可以根据医嘱安全接种疫苗,同时可能改善患者的就医体验。与其重新部署稀缺的专业人员,任务分担策略可让训练有素的非专业疫苗接种者支持免疫接种、改善接种机会并促进社区参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Public Health is dedicated to fostering excellence in public health research, scholarship, policy and practice. The aim of the Journal is to advance public health research and practice in Canada and around the world, thus contributing to the improvement of the health of populations and the reduction of health inequalities. CJPH publishes original research and scholarly articles submitted in either English or French that are relevant to population and public health. CJPH is an independent, peer-reviewed journal owned by the Canadian Public Health Association and published by Springer.   Énoncé de mission La Revue canadienne de santé publique se consacre à promouvoir l’excellence dans la recherche, les travaux d’érudition, les politiques et les pratiques de santé publique. Son but est de faire progresser la recherche et les pratiques de santé publique au Canada et dans le monde, contribuant ainsi à l’amélioration de la santé des populations et à la réduction des inégalités de santé. La RCSP publie des articles savants et des travaux inédits, soumis en anglais ou en français, qui sont d’intérêt pour la santé publique et des populations. La RCSP est une revue indépendante avec comité de lecture, propriété de l’Association canadienne de santé publique et publiée par Springer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信