Considering collaborative incident management: A study of the COVID-19 response and initial recovery in a rural West Virginia community.

Q3 Medicine
Jeffery W Harvey, Calvin A Lathan, Henry T McDonald
{"title":"Considering collaborative incident management: A study of the COVID-19 response and initial recovery in a rural West Virginia community.","authors":"Jeffery W Harvey, Calvin A Lathan, Henry T McDonald","doi":"10.5055/jem.0816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hierarchical command-style structures are commonplace in the management of disasters, though researchers have begun to recommend the exploration of networked approaches to incident management. Furthermore, few studies are explicitly looking at the rural context of disaster management. This study seeks to contribute to both topics by examining the motivations for emergent collaboration in the direction of the response and initial recovery to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in a rural West Virginia community. Between March 2020 and March 2022, the primary investigator moderated regular briefings of a community task force convened to coordinate the pandemic response and recovery. As regular operations concluded, members completed a survey, and 10 randomly selected members participated in semistructured interviews regarding their experiences in the task force. Survey responses suggest that common motivations for collaboration in nondisaster contexts (as they appear in the scholarly literature) and potential benefits of networked approaches highlighted in the incident management literature could also serve as motivators within the disaster context. Qualitative interview data extend that discussion and identify the need to gain clear information regarding the concerned authorities and specific local information to better inform the expenditure of limited resources as two additional motivators for collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":38336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Management","volume":"22 3","pages":"275-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hierarchical command-style structures are commonplace in the management of disasters, though researchers have begun to recommend the exploration of networked approaches to incident management. Furthermore, few studies are explicitly looking at the rural context of disaster management. This study seeks to contribute to both topics by examining the motivations for emergent collaboration in the direction of the response and initial recovery to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in a rural West Virginia community. Between March 2020 and March 2022, the primary investigator moderated regular briefings of a community task force convened to coordinate the pandemic response and recovery. As regular operations concluded, members completed a survey, and 10 randomly selected members participated in semistructured interviews regarding their experiences in the task force. Survey responses suggest that common motivations for collaboration in nondisaster contexts (as they appear in the scholarly literature) and potential benefits of networked approaches highlighted in the incident management literature could also serve as motivators within the disaster context. Qualitative interview data extend that discussion and identify the need to gain clear information regarding the concerned authorities and specific local information to better inform the expenditure of limited resources as two additional motivators for collaboration.

考虑协同事件管理:对 COVID-19 在西弗吉尼亚州农村社区的响应和初期恢复情况的研究。
在灾害管理中,等级森严的指挥式结构司空见惯,但研究人员已开始建议探索网络化的事件管理方法。此外,很少有研究明确关注灾害管理的农村背景。本研究试图通过考察西弗吉尼亚州一个农村社区在应对 2019 年冠状病毒疾病大流行和初期恢复过程中出现的合作动机,为这两个主题做出贡献。2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 3 月期间,主要研究人员主持了一个社区工作队的定期简报会,该工作队的召集是为了协调大流行病的应对和恢复工作。常规行动结束后,成员们填写了一份调查问卷,随机抽取的 10 名成员参加了半结构化访谈,了解他们在特遣部队中的经历。调查反馈表明,非灾害背景下合作的共同动机(如学术文献中所述)和事件管理文献中强调的网络化方法的潜在益处也可以作为灾害背景下的动机。定性访谈数据扩展了这一讨论,并指出需要获得有关当局的明确信息和当地的具体信息,以便更好地了解有限资源的支出情况,这是合作的另外两个动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Management
Journal of Emergency Management Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信