[Effectiveness of sequential method pure single-port lumpectomy-breast conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer in different quadrants].

Q3 Medicine
Qianhe Zhou, Jianyu Liu, Wenzheng Wang, Yingpu Li, Zhigao Li
{"title":"[Effectiveness of sequential method pure single-port lumpectomy-breast conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer in different quadrants].","authors":"Qianhe Zhou, Jianyu Liu, Wenzheng Wang, Yingpu Li, Zhigao Li","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202403083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of sequential method pure single-port lumpectomy-breast conserving surgery (SMPSL-BCS) in treating early-stage breast cancer patients with tumors in different quadrants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 200 early-stage breast cancer female patients admitted between January 2023 and December 2023. According to the quadrant where the tumor was located, the patients were allocated into the upper outer quadrant group (UO group), lower outer quadrant group (LO group), upper inner quadrant group (UI group), and lower inner quadrant group (LI group), with 50 cases in each group. There was no significant difference ( <i>P</i>>0.05) in the baseline data, including age, body mass index, smoking history, marital status, comorbidities, affected breast side, maximum tumor diameter on ultrasound, maximum pathological tumor diameter, clinical tumor stage, molecular subtype, and disease duration. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and extubation time were recorded and compared between groups. Additionally, the occurrence of early-stage complications (1-3 months after operation; including subcutaneous fluid accumulation, incision infection, superficial skin burns) and late-stage complications (>3 months after operation; including pectoralis major muscle adhesion, changes in breast appearance and shape, sensory discomfort) were assessed. At 6 months after operation, the cosmetic outcome of breast-conserving surgery was rated for all groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UO group had the shortest operation time, followed by the UI group, LO group, and LI group, showing significant differences between groups ( <i>P</i><0.05). The UO group had the least intraoperative blood loss, followed by the LO group, UI group, and LI group; except for the difference between UO group and LO group, which was not significant ( <i>P</i>>0.05), the differences between the other groups were significant ( <i>P</i><0.05). The UO group had the least postoperative drainage volume, followed by the LO group, UI group, and LI group; except for the difference between LO group and UI group, which was not significant ( <i>P</i>>0.05), the differences between the other groups were significant ( <i>P</i><0.05). The extubation time of the LI group was significantly longer than that of the other groups ( <i>P</i><0.05). All patients were followed up 4-12 months, with an average of 8 months. And 193 patients were followed up more than 6 months, including 48 patients in UO group, 47 in LO group, 49 in UI group, and 49 in LI group. In the early-stage period, the LI group had a higher incidence of subcutaneous fluid accumulation after tube removal compared to the UO group and LO group ( <i>P</i><0.05), while there was no significant difference in the incidences of other early complications between groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). In the late-stage period, the LI group had significantly higher incidences of pectoralis major muscle adhesion and changes in breast appearance and shape than UO group and LO group ( <i>P</i><0.05), and a significantly higher incidence of sensory discomfort than UO group ( <i>P</i><0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidences of other late-stage complications between groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). At 6 months after operation, the cosmetic outcomes of breast-conserving surgery were significantly better in UO group, LO group, and UI group than in LI group ( <i>P</i><0.05); there was no significant difference between the other groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the treatment of early-stage breast cancer using SMPSL-BCS, patients with tumors located in the upper outer quadrant show the best effectiveness. The effectivenesses are similar for patients with tumors in the lower outer and upper inner quadrants. However, patients with tumors in the lower inner quadrant do not experience significant advantages. Therefore, it is recommended that SMPSL-BCS should not be the first-choice surgical method for patients with tumors in the lower inner quadrant.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11252693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202403083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of sequential method pure single-port lumpectomy-breast conserving surgery (SMPSL-BCS) in treating early-stage breast cancer patients with tumors in different quadrants.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 200 early-stage breast cancer female patients admitted between January 2023 and December 2023. According to the quadrant where the tumor was located, the patients were allocated into the upper outer quadrant group (UO group), lower outer quadrant group (LO group), upper inner quadrant group (UI group), and lower inner quadrant group (LI group), with 50 cases in each group. There was no significant difference ( P>0.05) in the baseline data, including age, body mass index, smoking history, marital status, comorbidities, affected breast side, maximum tumor diameter on ultrasound, maximum pathological tumor diameter, clinical tumor stage, molecular subtype, and disease duration. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and extubation time were recorded and compared between groups. Additionally, the occurrence of early-stage complications (1-3 months after operation; including subcutaneous fluid accumulation, incision infection, superficial skin burns) and late-stage complications (>3 months after operation; including pectoralis major muscle adhesion, changes in breast appearance and shape, sensory discomfort) were assessed. At 6 months after operation, the cosmetic outcome of breast-conserving surgery was rated for all groups.

Results: The UO group had the shortest operation time, followed by the UI group, LO group, and LI group, showing significant differences between groups ( P<0.05). The UO group had the least intraoperative blood loss, followed by the LO group, UI group, and LI group; except for the difference between UO group and LO group, which was not significant ( P>0.05), the differences between the other groups were significant ( P<0.05). The UO group had the least postoperative drainage volume, followed by the LO group, UI group, and LI group; except for the difference between LO group and UI group, which was not significant ( P>0.05), the differences between the other groups were significant ( P<0.05). The extubation time of the LI group was significantly longer than that of the other groups ( P<0.05). All patients were followed up 4-12 months, with an average of 8 months. And 193 patients were followed up more than 6 months, including 48 patients in UO group, 47 in LO group, 49 in UI group, and 49 in LI group. In the early-stage period, the LI group had a higher incidence of subcutaneous fluid accumulation after tube removal compared to the UO group and LO group ( P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the incidences of other early complications between groups ( P>0.05). In the late-stage period, the LI group had significantly higher incidences of pectoralis major muscle adhesion and changes in breast appearance and shape than UO group and LO group ( P<0.05), and a significantly higher incidence of sensory discomfort than UO group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidences of other late-stage complications between groups ( P>0.05). At 6 months after operation, the cosmetic outcomes of breast-conserving surgery were significantly better in UO group, LO group, and UI group than in LI group ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the other groups ( P>0.05).

Conclusion: In the treatment of early-stage breast cancer using SMPSL-BCS, patients with tumors located in the upper outer quadrant show the best effectiveness. The effectivenesses are similar for patients with tumors in the lower outer and upper inner quadrants. However, patients with tumors in the lower inner quadrant do not experience significant advantages. Therefore, it is recommended that SMPSL-BCS should not be the first-choice surgical method for patients with tumors in the lower inner quadrant.

[不同象限早期乳腺癌单纯单孔肿块切除-保乳手术的疗效]。
目的:比较序列法纯单孔肿块切除-保乳手术(SMPSL-BCS)治疗不同象限肿瘤的早期乳腺癌患者的效果:比较顺序法纯单孔肿块切除-保乳手术(SMPSL-BCS)治疗肿瘤位于不同象限的早期乳腺癌患者的效果:对2023年1月至2023年12月期间收治的200例早期乳腺癌女性患者进行回顾性分析。根据肿瘤所在象限将患者分为外上象限组(UO 组)、外下象限组(LO 组)、内上象限组(UI 组)和内下象限组(LI 组),每组 50 例。两组患者的年龄、体重指数、吸烟史、婚姻状况、合并症、患侧乳房、超声检查肿瘤最大直径、病理检查肿瘤最大直径、肿瘤临床分期、分子亚型、病程等基线资料差异无学意义(P>0.05)。记录手术时间、术中失血量、术后引流量和拔管时间,并进行组间比较。此外,还评估了早期并发症(术后 1-3 个月,包括皮下积液、切口感染、表皮灼伤)和晚期并发症(术后 3 个月以上,包括胸大肌粘连、乳房外观和形状改变、感觉不适)的发生情况。术后 6 个月,对各组保乳手术的美容效果进行评分:结果:UO 组手术时间最短,其次是 UI 组、LO 组和 LI 组,组间差异有显著性(PP>0.05),其他组间差异有显著性(PP>0.05),其他组间差异有显著性(PPPP>0.05)。在晚期,LI 组胸大肌粘连发生率和乳房外观形态变化明显高于 UO 组和 LO 组(PPP>0.05)。术后 6 个月,UO 组、LO 组和 UI 组的保乳手术美容效果明显优于 LI 组(PP>0.05):结论:在使用 SMPSL-BCS 治疗早期乳腺癌时,肿瘤位于外上象限的患者疗效最佳。肿瘤位于外下象限和内上象限的患者疗效相似。然而,肿瘤位于内下象限的患者并没有明显的优势。因此,建议 SMPSL-BCS 不作为内下象限肿瘤患者的首选手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信