Evaluation of Microstrain in the Regions Surrounding Morse Taper and External Hexagon Implants.

Q1 Dentistry
André Luiz de Melo Moreno, Marcio Campaner, Clóvis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto, Nathaly Vilene de Araújo Moreno, Daniela Micheline Dos Santos, Marcelo Coelho Goiato
{"title":"Evaluation of Microstrain in the Regions Surrounding Morse Taper and External Hexagon Implants.","authors":"André Luiz de Melo Moreno, Marcio Campaner, Clóvis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto, Nathaly Vilene de Araújo Moreno, Daniela Micheline Dos Santos, Marcelo Coelho Goiato","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> The aim of this study was to compare the Morse taper (MT) + titanium base (Ti-Base) abutment with the external hexagon (EH) + Ti-Base abutment by using the strain gauge method in the mesial, distal, and apical-buccal areas around these types of implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong> This study investigated two groups, MT and EH, each comprising five polyurethane samples with a dental implant in the area of artificial tooth 15 (3.75 × 11.5 mm) of a dental manikin. The strain gauges were glued to the mesial, distal, and apical-buccal polyurethane areas of all samples in relation to the implant. Ti-Base nonangled abutments measuring 5.0 × 4.7 × 1.0 mm (DSP, Brazil) were installed on the implants in each group. Ten identical zirconia crowns were constructed by scanning and milling and were subsequently cemented onto the Ti-base abutments with calcium hydroxide cement. Then, an axial load of 100 N was applied to the occlusal region of the zirconia crowns, and strain gauge measurements were taken.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong> Strain gauge data were assessed by a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with \"implant connection\" and \"strain gauge position\" factors, followed by the Bonferroni test (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The MT group exhibited a statistically significant reduction in microstrain in the mesial and apical strain gauge measurements compared to the EH group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The MT group exhibited less microstrain in the mesial and apical areas of the polyurethane samples near the implant. Consequently, the MT connection was considered more biomechanically advantageous.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  The aim of this study was to compare the Morse taper (MT) + titanium base (Ti-Base) abutment with the external hexagon (EH) + Ti-Base abutment by using the strain gauge method in the mesial, distal, and apical-buccal areas around these types of implants.

Materials and methods:  This study investigated two groups, MT and EH, each comprising five polyurethane samples with a dental implant in the area of artificial tooth 15 (3.75 × 11.5 mm) of a dental manikin. The strain gauges were glued to the mesial, distal, and apical-buccal polyurethane areas of all samples in relation to the implant. Ti-Base nonangled abutments measuring 5.0 × 4.7 × 1.0 mm (DSP, Brazil) were installed on the implants in each group. Ten identical zirconia crowns were constructed by scanning and milling and were subsequently cemented onto the Ti-base abutments with calcium hydroxide cement. Then, an axial load of 100 N was applied to the occlusal region of the zirconia crowns, and strain gauge measurements were taken.

Statistical analysis:  Strain gauge data were assessed by a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with "implant connection" and "strain gauge position" factors, followed by the Bonferroni test (p < 0.05).

Results:  The MT group exhibited a statistically significant reduction in microstrain in the mesial and apical strain gauge measurements compared to the EH group.

Conclusion:  The MT group exhibited less microstrain in the mesial and apical areas of the polyurethane samples near the implant. Consequently, the MT connection was considered more biomechanically advantageous.

莫尔斯锥形和外六角植入体周围区域的微应变评估
研究目的本研究的目的是通过应变片法在莫氏锥形(MT)+钛基(Ti-Base)基台与外六角(EH)+钛基基台这两种类型种植体周围的中轴、远轴和根尖颊侧区域进行比较:本研究调查了 MT 和 EH 两组,每组包括 5 个聚氨酯样本,并在牙科人体模型的人工牙 15(3.75 × 11.5 毫米)区域植入了种植体。应变片被粘贴在所有样品的聚氨酯中端、远端和根尖-颊侧与种植体相关的区域。每组的种植体上都安装了尺寸为 5.0 × 4.7 × 1.0 mm 的钛基无角基台(DSP,巴西)。通过扫描和铣削制作了 10 个相同的氧化锆冠,随后用氢氧化钙粘结剂将其粘结在钛基台上。然后,在氧化锆冠的咬合区施加 100 N 的轴向负荷,并进行应变测量:统计分析:应变计数据通过 "种植体连接 "和 "应变计位置 "因素的双因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行评估,然后进行Bonferroni检验(P 结果:与 EH 组相比,MT 组在中侧和顶侧应变片测量中表现出的微应变明显减少:结论:MT 组靠近种植体的聚氨酯样本的中间和顶端区域的微应变较小。因此,MT 连接在生物力学上更具优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信