AI-generated text in otolaryngology publications: a comparative analysis before and after the release of ChatGPT.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-08834-3
Jonathan M Carnino, Nicholas Y K Chong, Henry Bayly, Lindsay R Salvati, Hardeep S Tiwana, Jessica R Levi
{"title":"AI-generated text in otolaryngology publications: a comparative analysis before and after the release of ChatGPT.","authors":"Jonathan M Carnino, Nicholas Y K Chong, Henry Bayly, Lindsay R Salvati, Hardeep S Tiwana, Jessica R Levi","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08834-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study delves into the broader implications of artificial intelligence (AI) text generation technologies, including large language models (LLMs) and chatbots, on the scientific literature of otolaryngology. By observing trends in AI-generated text within published otolaryngology studies, this investigation aims to contextualize the impact of AI-driven tools that are reshaping scientific writing and communication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Text from 143 original articles published in JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery was collected, representing periods before and after ChatGPT's release in November 2022. The text from each article's abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion were entered into ZeroGPT.com to estimate the percentage of AI-generated content. Statistical analyses, including T-Tests and Fligner-Killeen's tests, were conducted using R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant increase was observed in the mean percentage of AI-generated text post-ChatGPT release, especially in the abstract (from 34.36 to 46.53%, p = 0.004), introduction (from 32.43 to 45.08%, p = 0.010), and discussion sections (from 15.73 to 25.03%, p = 0.015). Publications of authors from non-English speaking countries demonstrated a higher percentage of AI-generated text.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that the advent of ChatGPT has significantly impacted writing practices among researchers publishing in JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, raising concerns over the accuracy of AI-created content and potential misinformation risks. This manuscript highlights the evolving dynamics between AI technologies, scientific communication, and publication integrity, emphasizing the urgent need for continued research in this dynamic field. The findings also suggest an increasing reliance on AI tools like ChatGPT, raising questions about their broader implications for scientific publishing.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08834-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study delves into the broader implications of artificial intelligence (AI) text generation technologies, including large language models (LLMs) and chatbots, on the scientific literature of otolaryngology. By observing trends in AI-generated text within published otolaryngology studies, this investigation aims to contextualize the impact of AI-driven tools that are reshaping scientific writing and communication.

Methods: Text from 143 original articles published in JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery was collected, representing periods before and after ChatGPT's release in November 2022. The text from each article's abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion were entered into ZeroGPT.com to estimate the percentage of AI-generated content. Statistical analyses, including T-Tests and Fligner-Killeen's tests, were conducted using R.

Results: A significant increase was observed in the mean percentage of AI-generated text post-ChatGPT release, especially in the abstract (from 34.36 to 46.53%, p = 0.004), introduction (from 32.43 to 45.08%, p = 0.010), and discussion sections (from 15.73 to 25.03%, p = 0.015). Publications of authors from non-English speaking countries demonstrated a higher percentage of AI-generated text.

Conclusion: This study found that the advent of ChatGPT has significantly impacted writing practices among researchers publishing in JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, raising concerns over the accuracy of AI-created content and potential misinformation risks. This manuscript highlights the evolving dynamics between AI technologies, scientific communication, and publication integrity, emphasizing the urgent need for continued research in this dynamic field. The findings also suggest an increasing reliance on AI tools like ChatGPT, raising questions about their broader implications for scientific publishing.

Abstract Image

耳鼻喉科出版物中的人工智能生成文本:ChatGPT 发布前后的对比分析。
目的:本研究探讨了人工智能(AI)文本生成技术(包括大型语言模型(LLM)和聊天机器人)对耳鼻喉科科学文献的广泛影响。通过观察已发表的耳鼻喉科研究中人工智能生成文本的趋势,本调查旨在了解人工智能驱动的工具对科学写作和交流的影响:收集了《美国医学会耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科杂志》上发表的 143 篇原创文章的文本,这些文章分别发表于 ChatGPT 于 2022 年 11 月发布之前和之后。将每篇文章的摘要、引言、方法、结果和讨论的文本输入 ZeroGPT.com,以估算人工智能生成内容的百分比。统计分析(包括 T 检验和 Fligner-Killeen 检验)使用 R.Results 进行:结果:ChatGPT 发布后,人工智能生成文本的平均百分比明显增加,尤其是摘要(从 34.36% 增加到 46.53%,p = 0.004)、引言(从 32.43% 增加到 45.08%,p = 0.010)和讨论部分(从 15.73% 增加到 25.03%,p = 0.015)。来自非英语国家的作者发表的论文使用人工智能生成文本的比例更高:本研究发现,ChatGPT 的出现极大地影响了在《美国医学会耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科杂志》上发表文章的研究人员的写作实践,引发了人们对人工智能创建内容的准确性和潜在误导风险的担忧。这篇手稿强调了人工智能技术、科学交流和出版完整性之间不断变化的动态关系,强调了在这一动态领域继续开展研究的迫切需要。研究结果还表明,人们对 ChatGPT 等人工智能工具的依赖程度越来越高,这也引发了人们对这些工具对科学出版的广泛影响的质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信