Age- and Sex-Specific Myocardial Blood Flow Values in Patients Without Coronary Atherosclerosis on Rb-82 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.016577
Brett W Sperry, Mark P Metzinger, Ali O Ibrahim, Randall C Thompson, Yoon J Cho, Phillip G Jones, A Iain McGhie, Timothy M Bateman
{"title":"Age- and Sex-Specific Myocardial Blood Flow Values in Patients Without Coronary Atherosclerosis on Rb-82 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.","authors":"Brett W Sperry, Mark P Metzinger, Ali O Ibrahim, Randall C Thompson, Yoon J Cho, Phillip G Jones, A Iain McGhie, Timothy M Bateman","doi":"10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.016577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) on positron-emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging is a measure of the overall health of the coronary circulation. The ability to adequately augment blood flow, measured by myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR), is associated with lower major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. The age-specific ranges of MBFR in patients without demonstrable coronary artery disease have not been well established. We aimed to determine the effect of age and sex on MBF in a cohort of patients without demonstrable coronary artery disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent positron-emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging studies from 2012 to 2022 on positron-emission tomography/computed tomography cameras were included if the summed stress score was 0, the coronary calcium score was 0, and the left ventricular ejection fraction was ≥50%. Those with known coronary artery disease, prior history of coronary intervention, diabetes, heart/kidney/liver transplant, cirrhosis, or chronic kidney disease stage IV+ were excluded. MBF was calculated using a net retention model (ImagenQ, Cardiovascular Imaging Technologies, Kansas City), and quantile regression models were developed to predict MBF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2789 patients (age 59.9±13.0 years, 76.4% females), median rest MBF was 0.73 (0.60-0.91) mL/min·g, stress MBF was 1.72 (1.41-2.10) mL/min·g, and MBFR was 2.31 (1.96-2.74). Across all ages, males augmented MBF in response to vasodilator stress to a greater degree than females but achieved lower absolute stress MBF. Younger males in particular achieved a higher MBFR than their female counterparts, and this gap narrowed with increasing age. Predicted MBFR for a 20-year-old male was 3.18 and female was 2.50, while predicted MBFR for an 80-year-old male was 2.17 and female was 2.02.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients without demonstrable coronary artery disease, MBFR is higher in younger males than younger females and decreases with age in both sexes. Age- and sex-specific MBFR may be important in risk prediction and guidance for revascularization and warrant further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10202,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"17 7","pages":"e016577"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.016577","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) on positron-emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging is a measure of the overall health of the coronary circulation. The ability to adequately augment blood flow, measured by myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR), is associated with lower major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. The age-specific ranges of MBFR in patients without demonstrable coronary artery disease have not been well established. We aimed to determine the effect of age and sex on MBF in a cohort of patients without demonstrable coronary artery disease.

Methods: Patients who underwent positron-emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging studies from 2012 to 2022 on positron-emission tomography/computed tomography cameras were included if the summed stress score was 0, the coronary calcium score was 0, and the left ventricular ejection fraction was ≥50%. Those with known coronary artery disease, prior history of coronary intervention, diabetes, heart/kidney/liver transplant, cirrhosis, or chronic kidney disease stage IV+ were excluded. MBF was calculated using a net retention model (ImagenQ, Cardiovascular Imaging Technologies, Kansas City), and quantile regression models were developed to predict MBF.

Results: Among 2789 patients (age 59.9±13.0 years, 76.4% females), median rest MBF was 0.73 (0.60-0.91) mL/min·g, stress MBF was 1.72 (1.41-2.10) mL/min·g, and MBFR was 2.31 (1.96-2.74). Across all ages, males augmented MBF in response to vasodilator stress to a greater degree than females but achieved lower absolute stress MBF. Younger males in particular achieved a higher MBFR than their female counterparts, and this gap narrowed with increasing age. Predicted MBFR for a 20-year-old male was 3.18 and female was 2.50, while predicted MBFR for an 80-year-old male was 2.17 and female was 2.02.

Conclusions: In patients without demonstrable coronary artery disease, MBFR is higher in younger males than younger females and decreases with age in both sexes. Age- and sex-specific MBFR may be important in risk prediction and guidance for revascularization and warrant further study.

Rb-82 PET 心肌灌注成像显示无冠状动脉粥样硬化患者心肌血流量的年龄和性别特异性值
背景:正电子发射断层扫描心肌灌注成像的定量心肌血流(MBF)是衡量冠状动脉循环整体健康程度的指标。以心肌血流储备(MBFR)衡量的充分增强血流的能力与降低主要不良心血管事件和全因死亡率有关。在没有明显冠状动脉疾病的患者中,心肌血流储备的年龄特异性范围尚未得到很好的确定。我们旨在确定无明显冠状动脉疾病患者队列中年龄和性别对 MBF 的影响:方法:2012 年至 2022 年期间接受正电子发射断层扫描心肌灌注成像研究的正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描相机患者,如果压力总和评分为 0、冠状动脉钙化评分为 0 且左心室射血分数≥50%,则纳入研究对象。已知有冠状动脉疾病、既往有冠状动脉介入治疗史、糖尿病、心脏/肾脏/肝脏移植、肝硬化或慢性肾脏病 IV+ 期者除外。使用净保留模型(ImagenQ,堪萨斯城心血管成像技术公司)计算 MBF,并建立量子回归模型来预测 MBF:在 2789 名患者(年龄为 59.9±13.0 岁,76.4% 为女性)中,中位静息 MBF 为 0.73 (0.60-0.91) mL/min-g,压力 MBF 为 1.72 (1.41-2.10) mL/min-g,MBFR 为 2.31 (1.96-2.74)。在所有年龄段中,男性在血管扩张剂压力下增加 MBF 的程度高于女性,但绝对压力 MBF 却低于女性。尤其是年轻男性的 MBFR 要高于女性,而且随着年龄的增长,这一差距也在缩小。20 岁男性的预测 MBFR 为 3.18,女性为 2.50,而 80 岁男性的预测 MBFR 为 2.17,女性为 2.02:在没有明显冠状动脉疾病的患者中,年轻男性的 MBFR 要高于年轻女性,而且随着年龄的增长,男女的 MBFR 都会下降。年龄和性别特异性 MBFR 可能对风险预测和血管再通手术有重要指导意义,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
225
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, an American Heart Association journal, publishes high-quality, patient-centric articles focusing on observational studies, clinical trials, and advances in applied (translational) research. The journal features innovative, multimodality approaches to the diagnosis and risk stratification of cardiovascular disease. Modalities covered include echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy, magnetic resonance angiography, cardiac positron emission tomography, noninvasive assessment of vascular and endothelial function, radionuclide imaging, molecular imaging, and others. Article types considered by Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging include Original Research, Research Letters, Advances in Cardiovascular Imaging, Clinical Implications of Molecular Imaging Research, How to Use Imaging, Translating Novel Imaging Technologies into Clinical Applications, and Cardiovascular Images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信