Efficacy of Diagnostic Testing of Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Contemporary Review.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1159/000539916
Edward Woods, Josiah Bennett, Sanjay Chandrasekhar, Noah Newman, Affan Rizwan, Rehma Siddiqui, Rabisa Khan, Muzamil Khawaja, Chayakrit Krittanawong
{"title":"Efficacy of Diagnostic Testing of Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Contemporary Review.","authors":"Edward Woods, Josiah Bennett, Sanjay Chandrasekhar, Noah Newman, Affan Rizwan, Rehma Siddiqui, Rabisa Khan, Muzamil Khawaja, Chayakrit Krittanawong","doi":"10.1159/000539916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a highly prevalent condition which can lead to myocardial ischemia as well as acute coronary syndrome. Early diagnosis of CAD can improve patient outcomes through guiding risk factor modification and treatment modalities.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Testing for CAD comes with increased cost and risk; therefore, physicians must determine which patients require testing, and what testing modality will offer the most useful data to diagnose patients with CAD. Patients should have an initial risk stratification for pretest probability of CAD based on symptoms and available clinical data. Patients with a pretest probability less than 5% should receive no further testing, while patients with a high pretest probability should be considered for direct invasive coronary angiography. In patients with a pretest probability between 5 and 15%, coronary artery calcium score and or exercise electrocardiogram can be obtained to further risk stratify patients to low-risk versus intermediate-high-risk. Intermediate-high-risk patients should be tested with coronary computed tomography angiography (preferred) versus positron emission tomography or single photon emission computed tomography based on their individual patient characteristics and institutional availability.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>This comprehensive review aimed to describe the available CAD testing modalities, detail their risks and benefits, and propose when each should be considered in the evaluation of a patient with suspected CAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a highly prevalent condition which can lead to myocardial ischemia as well as acute coronary syndrome. Early diagnosis of CAD can improve patient outcomes through guiding risk factor modification and treatment modalities.

Summary: Testing for CAD comes with increased cost and risk; therefore, physicians must determine which patients require testing, and what testing modality will offer the most useful data to diagnose patients with CAD. Patients should have an initial risk stratification for pretest probability of CAD based on symptoms and available clinical data. Patients with a pretest probability less than 5% should receive no further testing, while patients with a high pretest probability should be considered for direct invasive coronary angiography. In patients with a pretest probability between 5 and 15%, coronary artery calcium score and or exercise electrocardiogram can be obtained to further risk stratify patients to low-risk versus intermediate-high-risk. Intermediate-high-risk patients should be tested with coronary computed tomography angiography (preferred) versus positron emission tomography or single photon emission computed tomography based on their individual patient characteristics and institutional availability.

Key messages: This comprehensive review aimed to describe the available CAD testing modalities, detail their risks and benefits, and propose when each should be considered in the evaluation of a patient with suspected CAD.

疑似冠状动脉疾病诊断测试的有效性:当代回顾
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)影响着 2000 多万美国人,其影响范围之广,估计每年导致全球 700 万人死亡,以及损失 1.29 亿个残疾调整寿命年。冠状动脉粥样硬化是冠状动脉中形成粥样硬化斑块的过程。这些斑块最终会限制流向心肌组织的血液,导致心肌缺血,从而引发急性斑块破裂和急性冠脉综合征。虽然胸痛可能代表多种潜在疾病,但鉴于与 CAD 相关的高发病率和死亡率,必须始终考虑缺血性心脏病的病因。CAD 的早期诊断和治疗可通过指导风险因素调整和治疗方式(包括药物和侵入性方法)改善患者的预后。虽然早期发现冠状动脉疾病可以使治疗产生巨大的效益13 ,但许多检查都是模棱两可的,可能会带来额外的风险和不必要的费用。这就留下了一个问题:如果担心有稳定的冠状动脉粥样硬化,我们应该对谁进行检测,应该使用哪种方式?本综述旨在介绍现有的 CAD 检测方法,详细说明其风险和益处,并说明在对疑似 CAD 患者进行评估时应考虑每种方法。(中央插图)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信