A seabird’s eye view: visual fields of some seabirds (Laridae and Procellariidae) from tropical latitudes

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Eleanor A. Lucas, Graham R. Martin, Gérard Rocamora, Steven J. Portugal
{"title":"A seabird’s eye view: visual fields of some seabirds (Laridae and Procellariidae) from tropical latitudes","authors":"Eleanor A. Lucas,&nbsp;Graham R. Martin,&nbsp;Gérard Rocamora,&nbsp;Steven J. Portugal","doi":"10.1007/s00114-024-01926-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The visual field of a bird defines the amount of information that can be extracted from the environment around it, using the eyes. Previous visual field research has left large phylogenetic gaps, where tropical bird species have been comparatively understudied. Using the ophthalmoscopic technique, we measured the visual fields of seven tropical seabird species, to understand what are the primary determinants of their visual fields. The visual field topographies of the seven seabird species were relatively similar, despite the two groups of Terns (Laridae) and Shearwaters (Procellariidae) being phylogenetically distant. We propose this similarity is due to their largely similar foraging ecology. These findings support previous research that foraging ecology rather than relatedness is the key determining factor behind a bird’s visual field topography. Some bird species were identified to have more limited binocular fields, such as Brown Noddies (<i>Anous stolidus</i>) where binocularity onsets lower down within the visual field, resulting in a larger blind area about the head.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":794,"journal":{"name":"The Science of Nature","volume":"111 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Science of Nature","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00114-024-01926-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The visual field of a bird defines the amount of information that can be extracted from the environment around it, using the eyes. Previous visual field research has left large phylogenetic gaps, where tropical bird species have been comparatively understudied. Using the ophthalmoscopic technique, we measured the visual fields of seven tropical seabird species, to understand what are the primary determinants of their visual fields. The visual field topographies of the seven seabird species were relatively similar, despite the two groups of Terns (Laridae) and Shearwaters (Procellariidae) being phylogenetically distant. We propose this similarity is due to their largely similar foraging ecology. These findings support previous research that foraging ecology rather than relatedness is the key determining factor behind a bird’s visual field topography. Some bird species were identified to have more limited binocular fields, such as Brown Noddies (Anous stolidus) where binocularity onsets lower down within the visual field, resulting in a larger blind area about the head.

Abstract Image

海鸟的视角:热带地区一些海鸟(鸻科和疣鼻鱼科)的视野。
鸟类的视野决定了用眼睛从周围环境中提取的信息量。以往的视野研究留下了巨大的系统发育空白,其中热带鸟类物种的研究相对不足。我们利用眼科视镜技术测量了七种热带海鸟的视野,以了解它们视野的主要决定因素。尽管燕鸥(鸻科)和剪嘴鸥(鸥科)这两个类群在系统发育上相距甚远,但这七种海鸟的视野拓扑结构却相对相似。我们认为这种相似性是由于它们的觅食生态基本相似。这些发现支持了之前的研究,即觅食生态学而非亲缘关系是决定鸟类视野地形的关键因素。一些鸟类的双目视野更为有限,例如褐马鸡(Anous stolidus)的双目视野开始于视野的下方,导致头部盲区更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Science of Nature
The Science of Nature 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Science of Nature - Naturwissenschaften - is Springer''s flagship multidisciplinary science journal. The journal is dedicated to the fast publication and global dissemination of high-quality research and invites papers, which are of interest to the broader community in the biological sciences. Contributions from the chemical, geological, and physical sciences are welcome if contributing to questions of general biological significance. Particularly welcomed are contributions that bridge between traditionally isolated areas and attempt to increase the conceptual understanding of systems and processes that demand an interdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信