Comment on “ASEAN Economic Integration: Addressing Challenges and Embracing Opportunities”

IF 4.5 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jong-Wha Lee
{"title":"Comment on “ASEAN Economic Integration: Addressing Challenges and Embracing Opportunities”","authors":"Jong-Wha Lee","doi":"10.1111/aepr.12463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past several decades, the economies of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) have made significant progresses in terms of per capita income and living standards. This economic growth in ASEAN has been accompanied by a concurrent increase in cross-border exchanges and a deepening of trade and investment within the region. The interconnectedness was supported by a strong trend of firms building supply chains to cater to both Asian and global markets.</p><p>Park (<span>2024</span>) explores the macroeconomic and developmental policies necessary to stimulate economic integration and growth within ASEAN while also discussing the current outlook and risks facing the region. The paper offers insights into economic transformation and integration through trade and investment in ASEAN, serving as a useful reference for readers seeking to comprehend the status and future challenges of ASEAN economies.</p><p>I have a few comments.</p><p>Section 3 of Park (<span>2024</span>) provides valuable data and insights into ASEAN's economic integration via trade and investment, emphasizing the significant role of China in the region's trade. ASEAN's merchandise trade with China accounted for 18.6% of total ASEAN trade, comparable to its trade among ASEAN members at 22.3% in 2022.</p><p>This section also analyzes the progress of global value chains (GVC) and regional value chains (RVC) in ASEAN. The GVC participation rate, defined as the share of value-added contents in ASEAN's gross exports exported for further processing overseas, reached 78.2% in 2022. Meanwhile, the ASEAN-to-ASEAN gross RVC participation rate, defined as “the share of ASEAN's merchandise exports that involves production in at least two economies using cross-border production networks to total gross exports with linkages all within the ASEAN region” (ADB, <span>2023</span>), reached 54.8%. Therefore, ASEAN's RVC intensity is much lower than ASEAN's GVC intensity. This low RVC intensity must be associated with the important role of other Asian economies, notably China, in the global and regional production networks of ASEAN, as well as the industry and trade structure of ASEAN economies. We expect that ASEAN will continue to emerge as one of the most important regional hubs for GVC as the region experiences strong growth and develops more technologically intensive industries. The region may also witness a heightened intensity of RVC with deeper intraregional trade integration and industry upgrading.</p><p>Section 3 also emphasizes that foreign direct investment (FDI) has played a pivotal role in driving economic growth and transformation within the ASEAN region. It is important to highlight that the strong economic connections between ASEAN and East Asian economies, particularly with China, played a significant role in attracting FDI to the region. Historically, the USA, European Union (EU), and Japan have been the primary sources of inbound FDI for ASEAN. However, with the expansion of regional supply chains, investments from other Asian economies have seen significant growth. China has emerged as a critical assembly hub for the region's production sharing networks. However, China's role within GVC has been undergoing changes due to escalating labor costs and the repercussions of recent trade conflicts with the USA. Park suggests that these shifts may create fresh opportunities and challenges for ASEAN, as multinational corporations might explore alternative regional production bases. These critical points merit a more comprehensive exploration within the paper, which would substantially enhance its contribution to the expanding literature on this topic.</p><p>Recent studies have examined the impacts of the US-China trade and technology disputes on trade and FDI reallocation in global markets. The International Monetary Fund (<span>2023a</span>, <span>2023b</span>) shows US outbound FDI and capital flows to China have significantly declined. The USA and the EU have implemented policies directed at strengthening domestic production in strategic sectors and reducing the vulnerability from unaligned foreign suppliers, especially China. Freund <i>et al</i>. (<span>2023</span>) demonstrate that while the USA has experienced a rapid decline in imports from China, particularly in strategic sectors, its imports from certain ASEAN countries closely linked to China through RVC have increased. It is crucial to analyze the potential for geo-economic fragmentation and the resulting changes in global and regional value chains in Asia. Moreover, readers would benefit from a discussion of financial integration in ASEAN, particularly in relation to China's influence.</p><p>I find the discussion of policy recommendations for sustaining the region's growth momentum and integration in Park's (<span>2024</span>) section 4 is concise and valuable. As highlighted by Park, key tasks for ASEAN countries should include infrastructure development, digitalization, liberalization of services trade, fostering a flexible labor market, and promoting FDI. Additionally, the paper could explore how ASEAN countries can address external challenges posed by current geopolitical fragmentation and geo-economic threats. It is also left as future research to identify empirically the critical growth drivers of ASEAN economies and the prospects of economic and political convergence among ASEAN member states.</p>","PeriodicalId":45430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Economic Policy Review","volume":"19 2","pages":"194-195"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aepr.12463","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Economic Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aepr.12463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past several decades, the economies of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) have made significant progresses in terms of per capita income and living standards. This economic growth in ASEAN has been accompanied by a concurrent increase in cross-border exchanges and a deepening of trade and investment within the region. The interconnectedness was supported by a strong trend of firms building supply chains to cater to both Asian and global markets.

Park (2024) explores the macroeconomic and developmental policies necessary to stimulate economic integration and growth within ASEAN while also discussing the current outlook and risks facing the region. The paper offers insights into economic transformation and integration through trade and investment in ASEAN, serving as a useful reference for readers seeking to comprehend the status and future challenges of ASEAN economies.

I have a few comments.

Section 3 of Park (2024) provides valuable data and insights into ASEAN's economic integration via trade and investment, emphasizing the significant role of China in the region's trade. ASEAN's merchandise trade with China accounted for 18.6% of total ASEAN trade, comparable to its trade among ASEAN members at 22.3% in 2022.

This section also analyzes the progress of global value chains (GVC) and regional value chains (RVC) in ASEAN. The GVC participation rate, defined as the share of value-added contents in ASEAN's gross exports exported for further processing overseas, reached 78.2% in 2022. Meanwhile, the ASEAN-to-ASEAN gross RVC participation rate, defined as “the share of ASEAN's merchandise exports that involves production in at least two economies using cross-border production networks to total gross exports with linkages all within the ASEAN region” (ADB, 2023), reached 54.8%. Therefore, ASEAN's RVC intensity is much lower than ASEAN's GVC intensity. This low RVC intensity must be associated with the important role of other Asian economies, notably China, in the global and regional production networks of ASEAN, as well as the industry and trade structure of ASEAN economies. We expect that ASEAN will continue to emerge as one of the most important regional hubs for GVC as the region experiences strong growth and develops more technologically intensive industries. The region may also witness a heightened intensity of RVC with deeper intraregional trade integration and industry upgrading.

Section 3 also emphasizes that foreign direct investment (FDI) has played a pivotal role in driving economic growth and transformation within the ASEAN region. It is important to highlight that the strong economic connections between ASEAN and East Asian economies, particularly with China, played a significant role in attracting FDI to the region. Historically, the USA, European Union (EU), and Japan have been the primary sources of inbound FDI for ASEAN. However, with the expansion of regional supply chains, investments from other Asian economies have seen significant growth. China has emerged as a critical assembly hub for the region's production sharing networks. However, China's role within GVC has been undergoing changes due to escalating labor costs and the repercussions of recent trade conflicts with the USA. Park suggests that these shifts may create fresh opportunities and challenges for ASEAN, as multinational corporations might explore alternative regional production bases. These critical points merit a more comprehensive exploration within the paper, which would substantially enhance its contribution to the expanding literature on this topic.

Recent studies have examined the impacts of the US-China trade and technology disputes on trade and FDI reallocation in global markets. The International Monetary Fund (2023a, 2023b) shows US outbound FDI and capital flows to China have significantly declined. The USA and the EU have implemented policies directed at strengthening domestic production in strategic sectors and reducing the vulnerability from unaligned foreign suppliers, especially China. Freund et al. (2023) demonstrate that while the USA has experienced a rapid decline in imports from China, particularly in strategic sectors, its imports from certain ASEAN countries closely linked to China through RVC have increased. It is crucial to analyze the potential for geo-economic fragmentation and the resulting changes in global and regional value chains in Asia. Moreover, readers would benefit from a discussion of financial integration in ASEAN, particularly in relation to China's influence.

I find the discussion of policy recommendations for sustaining the region's growth momentum and integration in Park's (2024) section 4 is concise and valuable. As highlighted by Park, key tasks for ASEAN countries should include infrastructure development, digitalization, liberalization of services trade, fostering a flexible labor market, and promoting FDI. Additionally, the paper could explore how ASEAN countries can address external challenges posed by current geopolitical fragmentation and geo-economic threats. It is also left as future research to identify empirically the critical growth drivers of ASEAN economies and the prospects of economic and political convergence among ASEAN member states.

评论 "东盟经济一体化:应对挑战,迎接机遇" 发表评论
在过去的几十年里,东南亚国家联盟(东盟)的经济在人均收入和生活水平方面取得了长足的进步。在东盟经济增长的同时,区域内的跨境交流也在增加,贸易和投资也在深化。Park(2024 年)探讨了促进东盟经济一体化和增长所需的宏观经济和发展政策,同时还讨论了该地区目前的前景和面临的风险。Park (2024) 的第 3 章提供了有关东盟通过贸易和投资实现经济一体化的宝贵数据和见解,强调了中国在该地区贸易中的重要作用。东盟与中国的商品贸易占东盟贸易总额的 18.6%,与 2022 年东盟成员国之间 22.3%的贸易额相当。本节还分析了东盟全球价值链(GVC)和区域价值链(RVC)的进展情况。全球价值链参与率的定义是东盟出口总值中出口到海外深加工的增值内容所占的份额,2022 年达到 78.2%。同时,东盟到东盟的区域价值链总参与率达到 54.8%,该参与率的定义是 "东盟商品出口中至少有两个经济体利用跨境生产网络进行生产的份额,占东盟地区内有联系的总出口的份额"(亚洲开发银行,2023 年)。因此,东盟的区域价值链强度远低于东盟的全球价值链强度。这种较低的区域价值链强度肯定与其他亚洲经济体(尤其是中国)在东盟的全球和区域生产网络中的重要作用以及东盟经济体的产业和贸易结构有关。我们预计,随着东盟的强劲增长和技术密集型产业的发展,东盟将继续成为全球价值链最重要的区域中心之一。第 3 节还强调,外国直接投资(FDI)在推动东盟地区经济增长和转型方面发挥了关键作用。需要强调的是,东盟与东亚经济体,特别是与中国之间的紧密经济联系在吸引外国直接投资方面发挥了重要作用。从历史上看,美国、欧盟(EU)和日本一直是东盟外来直接投资的主要来源。然而,随着区域供应链的扩大,来自其他亚洲经济体的投资也出现了显著增长。中国已成为该地区生产共享网络的重要组装中心。然而,由于劳动力成本上升以及近期与美国贸易冲突的影响,中国在全球价值链中的角色正在发生变化。Park 认为,这些变化可能会给东盟带来新的机遇和挑战,因为跨国公司可能会探索其他地区的生产基地。最近的研究探讨了中美贸易和技术争端对全球市场贸易和外国直接投资重新分配的影响。国际货币基金组织(2023a, 2023b)显示,美国对中国的外商直接投资和资本流动大幅下降。美国和欧盟实施的政策旨在加强战略部门的国内生产,减少来自不结盟外国供应商(尤其是中国)的脆弱性。Freund 等人(2023 年)的研究表明,虽然美国从中国的进口迅速下降,尤其是在战略部门,但其通过区域价值链从某些与中国密切相关的东盟国家的进口却在增加。分析地缘经济分化的潜力以及由此导致的亚洲全球和区域价值链的变化至关重要。此外,关于东盟金融一体化的讨论,尤其是与中国影响力相关的讨论,也将使读者受益匪浅。我认为,Park(2024 年)在第 4 节中关于保持该地区增长势头和一体化的政策建议的讨论简明扼要,很有价值。正如 Park 所强调的,东盟国家的主要任务应包括基础设施建设、数字化、服务贸易自由化、促进灵活的劳动力市场以及促进外国直接投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The goal of the Asian Economic Policy Review is to become an intellectual voice on the current issues of international economics and economic policy, based on comprehensive and in-depth analyses, with a primary focus on Asia. Emphasis is placed on identifying key issues at the time - spanning international trade, international finance, the environment, energy, the integration of regional economies and other issues - in order to furnish ideas and proposals to contribute positively to the policy debate in the region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信