Treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adults: An expert consensus statement using a Delphi method to produce a decision-making algorithm

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
F. Poizeau , S. Leducq , L. Fardet , M. Beylot-Barry , Guillaume Chaby , M. Chastagner , F. Corgibet , L. Gouillon , N. Jouan , D. Jullien , A. Acher , F. Amatore , J.-M. Amici , H. Aubert , F. Aubin , N. Beneton , D Bouilly , A.-C. Bursztejn , C. Buzenet , M. Chamaillard-Pujol , B. Guillot
{"title":"Treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adults: An expert consensus statement using a Delphi method to produce a decision-making algorithm","authors":"F. Poizeau ,&nbsp;S. Leducq ,&nbsp;L. Fardet ,&nbsp;M. Beylot-Barry ,&nbsp;Guillaume Chaby ,&nbsp;M. Chastagner ,&nbsp;F. Corgibet ,&nbsp;L. Gouillon ,&nbsp;N. Jouan ,&nbsp;D. Jullien ,&nbsp;A. Acher ,&nbsp;F. Amatore ,&nbsp;J.-M. Amici ,&nbsp;H. Aubert ,&nbsp;F. Aubin ,&nbsp;N. Beneton ,&nbsp;D Bouilly ,&nbsp;A.-C. Bursztejn ,&nbsp;C. Buzenet ,&nbsp;M. Chamaillard-Pujol ,&nbsp;B. Guillot","doi":"10.1016/j.annder.2024.103287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>New highly effective drugs for moderate-to-severe cutaneous psoriasis are regularly marketed, and the hierarchy of treatments thus requires frequent review.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>A Delphi method was used to enable a structured expert consensus on the use of systemic treatments and phototherapy among adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Delphi method consists in achieving a convergence of opinions among a panel of experts using several rounds of questionnaires with controlled feedback between rounds. A two-part Delphi questionnaire was administered online to French psoriasis experts. In the first part, 180 items related to the prescription of systemic treatments and phototherapy for adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were grouped into 21 sections covering different lines of treatment and different forms of cutaneous psoriasis. The experts voted on each proposal using an ordinal 7-point Likert scale. The second part comprised 11 open-ended questions about special indications for each therapeutic class. These were converted into 101 questions for subsequent rounds. Consensus was deemed to have been reached if more than 80% of the experts agreed with a given proposal.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three rounds of questionnaires were sequentially sent to 35 participants between November 2021 and March 2022. Thirty-three (94%) completed all three rounds. For plaque psoriasis, only methotrexate was recommended by the experts as first-line systemic treatment (89% of votes). Cyclosporin was advocated in pustular and erythrodermic psoriasis, and acitretin was suggested for hyperkeratotic and palmoplantar psoriasis. In the event of failure of or intolerance to non-biological systemic treatments, guselkumab, risankizumab, ixekizumab or secukinumab were recommended by more than 80% of the experts. Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitors remain useful for patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Special indications were provided for each therapeutic class (methotrexate/narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy, psoralen/ultraviolet A phototherapy, cyclosporin, acitretin, apremilast, TNF inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitors, IL-17(R)A inhibitors, and IL-23 inhibitors).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This expert consensus statement indicate that newly available IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may be favored over TNF and IL-12/23 inhibitors as first-line biologics. The Centre of Evidence of the French Society of Dermatology has drawn up a decision-making algorithm to guide clinicians in the therapeutic management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7900,"journal":{"name":"Annales De Dermatologie Et De Venereologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0151963824000437/pdfft?md5=fcaadc1a0da475739a7b367b4cdb337a&pid=1-s2.0-S0151963824000437-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales De Dermatologie Et De Venereologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0151963824000437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

New highly effective drugs for moderate-to-severe cutaneous psoriasis are regularly marketed, and the hierarchy of treatments thus requires frequent review.

Objectives

A Delphi method was used to enable a structured expert consensus on the use of systemic treatments and phototherapy among adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Methods

The Delphi method consists in achieving a convergence of opinions among a panel of experts using several rounds of questionnaires with controlled feedback between rounds. A two-part Delphi questionnaire was administered online to French psoriasis experts. In the first part, 180 items related to the prescription of systemic treatments and phototherapy for adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were grouped into 21 sections covering different lines of treatment and different forms of cutaneous psoriasis. The experts voted on each proposal using an ordinal 7-point Likert scale. The second part comprised 11 open-ended questions about special indications for each therapeutic class. These were converted into 101 questions for subsequent rounds. Consensus was deemed to have been reached if more than 80% of the experts agreed with a given proposal.

Results

Three rounds of questionnaires were sequentially sent to 35 participants between November 2021 and March 2022. Thirty-three (94%) completed all three rounds. For plaque psoriasis, only methotrexate was recommended by the experts as first-line systemic treatment (89% of votes). Cyclosporin was advocated in pustular and erythrodermic psoriasis, and acitretin was suggested for hyperkeratotic and palmoplantar psoriasis. In the event of failure of or intolerance to non-biological systemic treatments, guselkumab, risankizumab, ixekizumab or secukinumab were recommended by more than 80% of the experts. Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitors remain useful for patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Special indications were provided for each therapeutic class (methotrexate/narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy, psoralen/ultraviolet A phototherapy, cyclosporin, acitretin, apremilast, TNF inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitors, IL-17(R)A inhibitors, and IL-23 inhibitors).

Conclusions

This expert consensus statement indicate that newly available IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may be favored over TNF and IL-12/23 inhibitors as first-line biologics. The Centre of Evidence of the French Society of Dermatology has drawn up a decision-making algorithm to guide clinicians in the therapeutic management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

成人中重度银屑病的治疗:使用德尔菲法制定决策算法的专家共识声明
背景治疗中重度皮肤银屑病的新型高效药物不断上市,因此需要经常对治疗方法的等级进行审查。方法德尔菲法是通过多轮问卷调查并在两轮调查之间控制反馈,使专家小组的意见趋于一致。我们在网上向法国银屑病专家发放了一份由两部分组成的德尔菲问卷。在第一部分中,与中重度银屑病成人患者的系统治疗和光疗处方相关的 180 个项目被分为 21 个部分,涵盖了不同的治疗方法和不同形式的皮肤银屑病。专家们采用 7 分制李克特量表对每项建议进行投票。第二部分包括 11 个开放式问题,涉及每个治疗类别的特殊适应症。这些问题被转换成 101 个问题,供后续轮次使用。结果2021年11月至2022年3月期间,向35名参与者依次发送了三轮问卷。33人(94%)完成了全部三轮问卷。对于斑块状银屑病,专家只推荐甲氨蝶呤作为一线系统治疗(89% 的投票)。环孢素被推荐用于脓疱型和红皮病型银屑病,阿曲汀被推荐用于角化过度型和掌跖银屑病。如果对非生物制剂系统治疗失败或不耐受,80% 以上的专家建议使用 guselkumab、risankizumab、ixekizumab 或 secukinumab。肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂对有心血管风险因素的患者仍然有用。每一类治疗药物(甲氨蝶呤/窄带紫外线B光疗、补骨脂素/紫外线A光疗、环孢素、阿昔替丁、阿普仑司特、TNF抑制剂、白细胞介素(IL)-12/23抑制剂、IL-17(R)A抑制剂和IL-23抑制剂)都有特殊适应症。结论该专家共识声明表明,作为一线生物制剂,新上市的IL-17和IL-23抑制剂可能比TNF和IL-12/23抑制剂更受青睐。法国皮肤病学会证据中心(Centre of Evidence of the French Society of Dermatology)制定了一套决策算法,以指导临床医生对中重度银屑病进行治疗管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Les Annales de dermatologie sont le rendez-vous mensuel incontournable de toute la dermatologie francophone, grâce à leur comité de rédaction qui assure une sélection rigoureuse des articles selon les normes de l''édition scientifique internationale. Une revue didactique, véritable aide à la pratique médicale quotidienne Pour compléter et enrichir la partie scientifique, la rubrique Formation médicale continue propose aux lecteurs des textes didactiques et interactifs (Cas pour diagnostic, Notes de pharmacovigilance, la Question du praticien, Dermatologie chirurgicale, la Sélection bibliographique du mois...) qui les font bénéficier d''une formation post-universitaire diversifiée et de qualité. La revue consacre également un espace pour la publication de questions des lecteurs auxquelles des experts apportent une réponse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信