Determinants of data use for programmatic evidence-based decision making at peripheral public health care centres in Haryana, India

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"Determinants of data use for programmatic evidence-based decision making at peripheral public health care centres in Haryana, India","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health policies and programs in India are put into practice at the local level, where the frontline managers -Medical Officers in Charges (MOICs) use data for evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) and implementing these programs. However, there are various organizational, technical, and individual determinants that can impact data use. The study aims to recognize the determinants of data-driven decision-making at the grassroots level.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The cross-sectional study collected primary empirical data from 120 MOICs from six identified districts in Haryana, India<strong>.</strong> Data utilization was the variable of interest and was measured through Data Utilization Score (DUS). Determinants affecting DUS were extracted through Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to identify predictors of data utilization from the extracted factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MOICs used routine data to plan, implement, manage, and monitor health programs, and administrative activities. Actual skill for data usage (65 %) was less than the anticipated skill (82 %). Twenty-seven reliable organizational, technical, and individual factors were generated from the 154 variables explaining 57.7 %–68 % of the total variance. Regression analysis showed that management meetings with superiors/subordinates, data-conducive and promotive culture, perceived data quality, incentivization, basic software knowledge/skills, and training needs were among the most significant predictors of data usage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although a disparity exists between the expected and actual data utilization skills of MOICs, still data-based decisions can be enhanced by effective management meetings, fostering a robust data culture, prioritizing skill development, and incentivizing data use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002094/pdfft?md5=50fc42d7ae8bd976d522a2671271f71f&pid=1-s2.0-S2213398424002094-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Health policies and programs in India are put into practice at the local level, where the frontline managers -Medical Officers in Charges (MOICs) use data for evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) and implementing these programs. However, there are various organizational, technical, and individual determinants that can impact data use. The study aims to recognize the determinants of data-driven decision-making at the grassroots level.

Methods

The cross-sectional study collected primary empirical data from 120 MOICs from six identified districts in Haryana, India. Data utilization was the variable of interest and was measured through Data Utilization Score (DUS). Determinants affecting DUS were extracted through Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to identify predictors of data utilization from the extracted factors.

Results

MOICs used routine data to plan, implement, manage, and monitor health programs, and administrative activities. Actual skill for data usage (65 %) was less than the anticipated skill (82 %). Twenty-seven reliable organizational, technical, and individual factors were generated from the 154 variables explaining 57.7 %–68 % of the total variance. Regression analysis showed that management meetings with superiors/subordinates, data-conducive and promotive culture, perceived data quality, incentivization, basic software knowledge/skills, and training needs were among the most significant predictors of data usage.

Conclusion

Although a disparity exists between the expected and actual data utilization skills of MOICs, still data-based decisions can be enhanced by effective management meetings, fostering a robust data culture, prioritizing skill development, and incentivizing data use.

印度哈里亚纳邦外围公共医疗保健中心使用数据进行循证计划决策的决定因素
背景印度的卫生政策和计划在地方一级付诸实施,一线管理人员--收费医务人员(MOICs)使用数据进行循证决策(EBDM)并实施这些计划。然而,有各种组织、技术和个人决定因素会影响数据的使用。这项横向研究收集了印度哈里亚纳邦 6 个确定地区 120 名 MOIC 的主要经验数据。数据利用率是研究的变量,通过数据利用率评分(DUS)来衡量。通过主成分分析(PCA)提取了影响 DUS 的决定因素。通过分层多元回归分析,从提取的因素中确定了数据利用率的预测因素。实际数据使用技能(65%)低于预期技能(82%)。从 154 个变量中产生了 27 个可靠的组织、技术和个人因素,解释了总方差的 57.7 %-68 %。回归分析表明,与上级/下级的管理会议、数据诱导和促进文化、感知的数据质量、激励、基本软件知识/技能和培训需求是预测数据使用的最重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信