The Emotional Impact of Suicide Assessment: A Qualitative Study of Military Family Medicine Residents.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI:10.22454/FamMed.2024.215649
Kathleen A McNamara, Mark A Dixon, David A Moss
{"title":"The Emotional Impact of Suicide Assessment: A Qualitative Study of Military Family Medicine Residents.","authors":"Kathleen A McNamara, Mark A Dixon, David A Moss","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2024.215649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Assessing suicide risk in primary care settings has become standard practice; however, the emotional toll on medical providers remains understudied. This qualitative study examines the emotional impact of suicide assessments among family medicine residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted one-on-one, semistructured, in-depth interviews with a convenience sample of residents enrolled in a family medicine residency program at a US military installation. Employing an exploratory, qualitative research approach, we iteratively coded transcribed interviews for content and themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For this study, we interviewed 15 family medicine residents spanning all three postgraduate year groups. The primary objective of the comprehensive study was to evaluate the confidence levels of family medicine residents in suicide risk screening, with the intent to identify educational gaps for improvement. However, unexpectedly, participants revealed their profound negative emotional responses during these assessments. The emotional impact of suicide risk assessment was the most frequently coded theme in the study, with participants noting six main emotional reactions to assessing suicide risk among their patients: fear, weariness, anxiety, shock, overwhelm, and inadequacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite claims of emotional detachment, participants often expressed surprise and vulnerability when faced with suicidal patients. With suicide screening becoming increasingly vital in primary care, understanding and mitigating the emotional impact on physicians is essential. Future research should explore strategies to support medical providers in navigating these challenging interactions effectively for both the patients and themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"509-511"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2024.215649","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Assessing suicide risk in primary care settings has become standard practice; however, the emotional toll on medical providers remains understudied. This qualitative study examines the emotional impact of suicide assessments among family medicine residents.

Methods: We conducted one-on-one, semistructured, in-depth interviews with a convenience sample of residents enrolled in a family medicine residency program at a US military installation. Employing an exploratory, qualitative research approach, we iteratively coded transcribed interviews for content and themes.

Results: For this study, we interviewed 15 family medicine residents spanning all three postgraduate year groups. The primary objective of the comprehensive study was to evaluate the confidence levels of family medicine residents in suicide risk screening, with the intent to identify educational gaps for improvement. However, unexpectedly, participants revealed their profound negative emotional responses during these assessments. The emotional impact of suicide risk assessment was the most frequently coded theme in the study, with participants noting six main emotional reactions to assessing suicide risk among their patients: fear, weariness, anxiety, shock, overwhelm, and inadequacy.

Conclusions: Despite claims of emotional detachment, participants often expressed surprise and vulnerability when faced with suicidal patients. With suicide screening becoming increasingly vital in primary care, understanding and mitigating the emotional impact on physicians is essential. Future research should explore strategies to support medical providers in navigating these challenging interactions effectively for both the patients and themselves.

自杀评估的情感影响:军事家庭医学住院医生的定性研究。
背景和目的:在初级医疗机构中评估自杀风险已成为标准做法;然而,对医疗服务提供者造成的情感伤害仍未得到充分研究。本定性研究探讨了自杀评估对全科住院医师的情绪影响:方法:我们对在美国军事设施参加全科住院医师培训项目的住院医师进行了一对一、半结构化的深度访谈。我们采用了一种探索性的定性研究方法,对转录的访谈内容和主题进行了反复编码:在这项研究中,我们采访了 15 名全科住院医师,涵盖了所有三个研究生年级组。这项综合研究的主要目的是评估家庭医学住院医师在自杀风险筛查方面的信心水平,从而找出需要改进的教育差距。然而,出乎意料的是,参与者在评估过程中暴露出了严重的负面情绪反应。自杀风险评估对情绪的影响是本研究中最常被编码的主题,参与者在评估患者自杀风险时主要有六种情绪反应:恐惧、疲惫、焦虑、震惊、不知所措和不足:尽管参与者声称自己在情感上是超脱的,但在面对有自杀倾向的病人时,他们往往会表示惊讶和脆弱。随着自杀筛查在初级医疗保健中变得越来越重要,了解并减轻对医生的情绪影响至关重要。未来的研究应该探索一些策略,以支持医疗服务提供者有效地与病人和自己进行这些具有挑战性的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信