Family Medicine Clerkship Directors' Perspectives on USMLE Pass/Fail Scoring: A CERA Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.22454/FamMed.2024.806898
Ashley Saucier, Shrestha Dubey, K'Mani Blyden, F David Schneider
{"title":"Family Medicine Clerkship Directors' Perspectives on USMLE Pass/Fail Scoring: A CERA Study.","authors":"Ashley Saucier, Shrestha Dubey, K'Mani Blyden, F David Schneider","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2024.806898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reports on the effects of changing the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 examination scoring to pass/fail are evolving in the medical literature. This Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance family medicine clerkship directors' study seeks to describe family medicine clerkship directors' perceptions on the impact of incorporation of Step 1 pass/fail score reporting on students' family medicine clerkship performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-six clerkship directors responded (56.8% response rate). After exclusion of Canadian schools, we analyzed 88 clerkship directors' responses from US schools. We used descriptive statistics for demographics and responses to survey questions. We used ꭓ2 analysis to determine statistically significant associations between survey items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clerkship directors did not observe changes in students' overall clinical performance after Step 1 pass/fail scoring (60.8%). Fifty percent of clerkship directors reported changes in Step 1 timing recommendations in the past 3 years. Reasons included curriculum redesign (30.5%), COVID (4.5%), change in Step 1 to pass/fail (11.0%), and other reasons (3.7%). Forty-five percent of these clerkship directors did not observe a change in students' clinical medical knowledge after Step 1 went to pass/fail. Eighty-four percent of these clerkship directors did not compare student performance on clerkship standardized exams before and after Step 1 score changes. We found no significant relationship between Step 1 timing and student performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study represents an early description of family medicine clerkship directors' perceived observations of the impact of Step 1 scoring changes on student performance. Continued investigation of the effects of USMLE Step 1 pass/fail scoring should occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"505-508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2024.806898","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Reports on the effects of changing the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 examination scoring to pass/fail are evolving in the medical literature. This Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance family medicine clerkship directors' study seeks to describe family medicine clerkship directors' perceptions on the impact of incorporation of Step 1 pass/fail score reporting on students' family medicine clerkship performance.

Methods: Ninety-six clerkship directors responded (56.8% response rate). After exclusion of Canadian schools, we analyzed 88 clerkship directors' responses from US schools. We used descriptive statistics for demographics and responses to survey questions. We used ꭓ2 analysis to determine statistically significant associations between survey items.

Results: Clerkship directors did not observe changes in students' overall clinical performance after Step 1 pass/fail scoring (60.8%). Fifty percent of clerkship directors reported changes in Step 1 timing recommendations in the past 3 years. Reasons included curriculum redesign (30.5%), COVID (4.5%), change in Step 1 to pass/fail (11.0%), and other reasons (3.7%). Forty-five percent of these clerkship directors did not observe a change in students' clinical medical knowledge after Step 1 went to pass/fail. Eighty-four percent of these clerkship directors did not compare student performance on clerkship standardized exams before and after Step 1 score changes. We found no significant relationship between Step 1 timing and student performance.

Conclusions: This study represents an early description of family medicine clerkship directors' perceived observations of the impact of Step 1 scoring changes on student performance. Continued investigation of the effects of USMLE Step 1 pass/fail scoring should occur.

全科实习主任对 USMLE 及格/不及格评分的看法:CERA 研究。
导言:有关将美国医学执业资格考试(USMLE)第 1 步考试计分改为及格/不及格的影响的报告在医学文献中不断涌现。这项全科医学教育研究联盟理事会全科实习主任研究旨在描述全科实习主任对纳入步骤 1 及格/不及格分数报告对学生全科实习表现的影响的看法:共有 96 名实习主任做出了回复(回复率为 56.8%)。在排除加拿大学校后,我们分析了来自美国学校的 88 名实习主任的回复。我们对人口统计学和对调查问题的回答进行了描述性统计。我们使用ꭓ2分析来确定调查项目之间具有统计学意义的关联:实习主任没有观察到学生在步骤 1 通过/未通过评分后的整体临床表现有变化(60.8%)。50%的实习主任报告说,在过去 3 年中,步骤 1 的时间安排建议发生了变化。原因包括课程重新设计(30.5%)、COVID(4.5%)、步骤 1 改为及格/不及格(11.0%)和其他原因(3.7%)。45%的实习主任在步骤1改为及格/不及格后没有观察到学生临床医学知识的变化。84%的实习主任没有比较学生在步骤 1 分数变化前后的实习标准化考试成绩。我们发现步骤 1 的时间安排与学生成绩之间没有明显关系:本研究代表了全科实习主任对步骤 1 评分变化对学生成绩影响的早期观察。应继续调查 USMLE 第 1 步通过/未通过评分的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信