A cross-sectional analysis of the content and quality of presurgical infant orthopedics videos on YouTube.

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Special Care in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1111/scd.13041

Osama Khader, Raed Alrubaiaan, Farida Abdunabi, Kabir Syed Gyasudeen, Fatemah Amir Rad, Sabarinath Prasad

{"title":"A cross-sectional analysis of the content and quality of presurgical infant orthopedics videos on YouTube.","authors":"Osama Khader, Raed Alrubaiaan, Farida Abdunabi, Kabir Syed Gyasudeen, Fatemah Amir Rad, Sabarinath Prasad","doi":"10.1111/scd.13041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Caregivers seeking additional information about Presurgical Infant Orthopedics (PSIO) may turn to online sources, but the quality of information on platforms like YouTube is uncertain.Aim: To investigate the content and quality of PSIO videos on YouTube.Design: YouTube videos were searched using keywords related to PSIO appliances. Videos that met the eligibility criteria (n = 52) were categorized as care provider or caregiver-based. Engagement metrics were analyzed and quality assessments were performed by two raters using the Global Quality Score (GQS), Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), and Medical Quality Video Evaluation Tool (MQ-VET).Results: Inter-rater and intra-rater correlations were high (r ≥0.9; p < 0.01), indicating excellent reliability. Strong correlations were observed between the GQS, VIQI, and MQ-VET scores (r: 0.86-0.91; p < 0.01). Mean GQS (2.7 ± 1.1), VIQI (13.0 ± 4.1), and MQ-VET (42.6 ± 12.4) scores indicated poor to moderate video quality. Most videos (73.1%) were in the care provider category and rated significantly higher (p < 0.05) in quality than the caregiver category for all three indices, but not for video engagement metrics.Conclusion: YouTube PSIO videos are not comprehensive and lack quality. Caregivers of infants undertaking PSIO should seek advice from care providers and not rely solely on YouTube videos.","PeriodicalId":47470,"journal":{"name":"Special Care in Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Care in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.13041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Caregivers seeking additional information about Presurgical Infant Orthopedics (PSIO) may turn to online sources, but the quality of information on platforms like YouTube is uncertain.

Aim: To investigate the content and quality of PSIO videos on YouTube.

Design: YouTube videos were searched using keywords related to PSIO appliances. Videos that met the eligibility criteria (n = 52) were categorized as care provider or caregiver-based. Engagement metrics were analyzed and quality assessments were performed by two raters using the Global Quality Score (GQS), Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), and Medical Quality Video Evaluation Tool (MQ-VET).

Results: Inter-rater and intra-rater correlations were high (r ≥0.9; p < 0.01), indicating excellent reliability. Strong correlations were observed between the GQS, VIQI, and MQ-VET scores (r: 0.86-0.91; p < 0.01). Mean GQS (2.7 ± 1.1), VIQI (13.0 ± 4.1), and MQ-VET (42.6 ± 12.4) scores indicated poor to moderate video quality. Most videos (73.1%) were in the care provider category and rated significantly higher (p < 0.05) in quality than the caregiver category for all three indices, but not for video engagement metrics.

Conclusion: YouTube PSIO videos are not comprehensive and lack quality. Caregivers of infants undertaking PSIO should seek advice from care providers and not rely solely on YouTube videos.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对 YouTube 上婴儿矫形手术前视频的内容和质量进行横向分析。

背景：目的：调查 YouTube 上 PSIO 视频的内容和质量：设计：使用与 PSIO 设备相关的关键词搜索 YouTube 视频。符合资格标准的视频（n = 52）被归类为基于护理提供者或护理人员的视频。由两名评分员使用全球质量评分（GQS）、视频信息和质量指数（VIQI）以及医疗质量视频评估工具（MQ-VET）对参与度指标进行分析和质量评估：评分者之间和评分者内部的相关性很高（r ≥0.9；p 结论：YouTube PSIO 视频并不全面：YouTube PSIO 视频不全面，质量不高。进行 PSIO 的婴儿护理者应向护理提供者寻求建议，而不应仅仅依赖 YouTube 视频。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Special Care in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

14.30%

发文量

120

期刊介绍： Special Care in Dentistry is the official journal of the Special Care Dentistry Association, the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for Persons with Disabilities, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry. It is the only journal published in North America devoted to improving oral health in people with special needs.