Comparative evaluation of disease dynamics in wild boar and domestic pigs experimentally inoculated intranasally with the European highly virulent African swine fever virus genotype II strain "Armenia 2007".

IF 3.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Pedro J Sánchez-Cordón, Fabian Z X Lean, Carrie Batten, Falko Steinbach, Aleksija Neimanis, Marie-Frédérique Le Potier, Emil Wikström-Lassa, Felicity Wynne, Rebecca Strong, Stephen McCleary, Helen Crooke, Dolores Gavier-Widén, Alejandro Núñez
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of disease dynamics in wild boar and domestic pigs experimentally inoculated intranasally with the European highly virulent African swine fever virus genotype II strain \"Armenia 2007\".","authors":"Pedro J Sánchez-Cordón, Fabian Z X Lean, Carrie Batten, Falko Steinbach, Aleksija Neimanis, Marie-Frédérique Le Potier, Emil Wikström-Lassa, Felicity Wynne, Rebecca Strong, Stephen McCleary, Helen Crooke, Dolores Gavier-Widén, Alejandro Núñez","doi":"10.1186/s13567-024-01343-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the reintroduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) in Europe in 2007 and its subsequent spread to Asia, wild boar has played a crucial role in maintaining and disseminating the virus. There are significant gaps in the knowledge regarding infection dynamics and disease pathogenesis in domestic pigs and wild boar, particularly at the early infection stage. We aimed to compare domestic pigs and wild boar infected intranasally to mimic natural infection with one of the original highly virulent genotype II ASFV isolates (Armenia 2007). The study involved euthanising three domestic pigs and three wild boar on days 1, 2, 3, and 5 post-infection, while four domestic pigs and four wild boar were monitored until they reached a humane endpoint. The parameters assessed included clinical signs, macroscopic lesions, viremia levels, tissue viral load, and virus shedding in nasal and rectal swabs from day 1 post-infection. Compared with domestic pigs, wild boar were more susceptible to ASFV, with a shorter incubation period and earlier onset of clinical signs. While wild boar reached a humane endpoint earlier than domestic pigs did, the macroscopic lesions were comparatively less severe. In addition, wild boar had earlier viremia, and the virus was also detected earlier in tissues. The medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes were identified as key portals for ASFV infection in both subspecies. No viral genome was detected in nasal or rectal swabs until shortly before reaching the humane endpoint in both domestic pigs and wild boar, suggesting limited virus shedding in acute infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":23658,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Research","volume":"55 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-024-01343-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the reintroduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) in Europe in 2007 and its subsequent spread to Asia, wild boar has played a crucial role in maintaining and disseminating the virus. There are significant gaps in the knowledge regarding infection dynamics and disease pathogenesis in domestic pigs and wild boar, particularly at the early infection stage. We aimed to compare domestic pigs and wild boar infected intranasally to mimic natural infection with one of the original highly virulent genotype II ASFV isolates (Armenia 2007). The study involved euthanising three domestic pigs and three wild boar on days 1, 2, 3, and 5 post-infection, while four domestic pigs and four wild boar were monitored until they reached a humane endpoint. The parameters assessed included clinical signs, macroscopic lesions, viremia levels, tissue viral load, and virus shedding in nasal and rectal swabs from day 1 post-infection. Compared with domestic pigs, wild boar were more susceptible to ASFV, with a shorter incubation period and earlier onset of clinical signs. While wild boar reached a humane endpoint earlier than domestic pigs did, the macroscopic lesions were comparatively less severe. In addition, wild boar had earlier viremia, and the virus was also detected earlier in tissues. The medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes were identified as key portals for ASFV infection in both subspecies. No viral genome was detected in nasal or rectal swabs until shortly before reaching the humane endpoint in both domestic pigs and wild boar, suggesting limited virus shedding in acute infections.

野猪和家猪实验性鼻内接种欧洲高致病性非洲猪瘟病毒基因 II 型毒株 "亚美尼亚 2007 "后的疾病动态比较评估。
自 2007 年非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)再次传入欧洲并随后蔓延到亚洲以来,野猪在病毒的维持和传播方面发挥了至关重要的作用。关于家猪和野猪的感染动态和疾病发病机理,尤其是在早期感染阶段,这方面的知识还存在很大差距。我们的目的是比较家猪和野猪鼻内感染的情况,以模拟 ASFV 原始高毒力基因 II 型分离株之一的自然感染(亚美尼亚,2007 年)。研究涉及在感染后第 1、2、3 和 5 天对三头家猪和三头野猪实施安乐死,同时对四头家猪和四头野猪进行监测,直到它们达到人道终点。评估参数包括感染后第 1 天起的临床症状、宏观病变、病毒血症水平、组织病毒载量以及鼻腔和直肠拭子中的病毒脱落。与家猪相比,野猪对 ASFV 的易感性更高,潜伏期更短,出现临床症状的时间更早。虽然野猪比家猪更早达到人道终点,但宏观病变却相对较轻。此外,野猪出现病毒血症的时间较早,在组织中检测到病毒的时间也较早。在两个亚种中,咽后内侧淋巴结都被确定为感染 ASFV 的关键门户。直到家猪和野猪达到人道终点前不久,才在鼻腔或直肠拭子中检测到病毒基因组,这表明急性感染时病毒脱落有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Research
Veterinary Research 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
92
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Veterinary Research is an open access journal that publishes high quality and novel research and review articles focusing on all aspects of infectious diseases and host-pathogen interaction in animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信