{"title":"[Bio-Bentall Procedure in Patients Over 65 Years of Age].","authors":"Yasunori Iida, Takahisa Ichinokawa, Kento Kuroo, Yu Inaba, Takashi Hachiya, Hideyuki Shimizu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to review the results of the bio-Bentall procedure in patients over 65 years of age at our hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Of the 65 aortic root replacement procedures performed at our hospital from October 2015 to January 2024, we reviewed 45 bio-Bentall procedures performed on patients 65 years of age or older. These patients consisted of 39 men and 6 women, with a mean age of 72 years. There were 5 patients with aortic dissection and 40 patients with non-dissection, and 6 patients had reoperation. There were 19 concomitant surgeries, including coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, and aortic procedure. The bioprosthetic valves used were Magna EASE in 17 patients, Inspiris in 25 patients, Trifecta in 2 patients, and Avalus in 1 patient. All Valsalva grafts used were J Graft Valsalva.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean intubation time was 19 hours, and the mean intensive care unit( ICU) stay was 6 days. The number of in-hospital deaths was 3 patients, and the mean length of hospital stay was 18 days. The remote mortality rate was 4( 1 heart failure, 2 lung cancer, and 1 pancreatic cancer). There have been no case of reoperation, structural valve deterioration (SVD), or thromboembolism to date, and the rates of freedom of reoperation, SVD, and thromboembolism were all 100%. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year survival rates were 91.1%, 86.4%, 83.6%, and 83.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The surgical and long-term outcomes of the bio-Bentall procedure in patients over 65 years of age were stable. In patients who may outlive the bioprosthetic valve life, it is important to perform an appropriate and durable Bentall procedure, including valve-in-valve, prioritizing the future of each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":17841,"journal":{"name":"Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to review the results of the bio-Bentall procedure in patients over 65 years of age at our hospital.
Materials and methods: Of the 65 aortic root replacement procedures performed at our hospital from October 2015 to January 2024, we reviewed 45 bio-Bentall procedures performed on patients 65 years of age or older. These patients consisted of 39 men and 6 women, with a mean age of 72 years. There were 5 patients with aortic dissection and 40 patients with non-dissection, and 6 patients had reoperation. There were 19 concomitant surgeries, including coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, and aortic procedure. The bioprosthetic valves used were Magna EASE in 17 patients, Inspiris in 25 patients, Trifecta in 2 patients, and Avalus in 1 patient. All Valsalva grafts used were J Graft Valsalva.
Results: The mean intubation time was 19 hours, and the mean intensive care unit( ICU) stay was 6 days. The number of in-hospital deaths was 3 patients, and the mean length of hospital stay was 18 days. The remote mortality rate was 4( 1 heart failure, 2 lung cancer, and 1 pancreatic cancer). There have been no case of reoperation, structural valve deterioration (SVD), or thromboembolism to date, and the rates of freedom of reoperation, SVD, and thromboembolism were all 100%. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year survival rates were 91.1%, 86.4%, 83.6%, and 83.6%, respectively.
Conclusion: The surgical and long-term outcomes of the bio-Bentall procedure in patients over 65 years of age were stable. In patients who may outlive the bioprosthetic valve life, it is important to perform an appropriate and durable Bentall procedure, including valve-in-valve, prioritizing the future of each patient.