Sarcopenia as a predictor of mortality in kidney transplant recipients: A 5-year prospective cohort study with propensity score matching.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
International Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1111/iju.15539
Akihiro Kosoku, Tomoaki Iwai, Kazuya Kabei, Shunji Nishide, Yuichi Machida, Takuma Ishihara, Junji Uchida
{"title":"Sarcopenia as a predictor of mortality in kidney transplant recipients: A 5-year prospective cohort study with propensity score matching.","authors":"Akihiro Kosoku, Tomoaki Iwai, Kazuya Kabei, Shunji Nishide, Yuichi Machida, Takuma Ishihara, Junji Uchida","doi":"10.1111/iju.15539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sarcopenia is known to bring about adverse outcomes in elderly populations and dialysis patients. However, whether it is a risk factor in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) has not yet been established. In the present study, the association of sarcopenia with mortality was investigated in KTRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study and recruited KTRs who were more than 1-year posttransplant from August 2017 to January 2018. The participants were followed for 5 years, and the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess patient survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 212 KTRs with a median age of 54 years and median transplant vintage of 79 months were enrolled in this study. Among them, 33 (16%) had sarcopenia according to the Asia Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 at baseline. During the 5-year follow-up period, 20 (9.4%) died, 5 returned to dialysis after graft loss, and 4 were lost to follow-up. The 5-year overall survival rate was 90%. After 1:1 propensity score matching, a matched cohort with 60 KTRs was generated. The overall survival rate was significantly lower in the sarcopenia group compared to the non-sarcopenia group (p = 0.025, log-rank test). Furthermore, mortality risk was significantly higher in the sarcopenia group compared to the non-sarcopenia group (hazard ratio = 7.57, 95% confidence interval = 0.94-62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sarcopenia was a predictor of mortality in KTRs. KTRs with suboptimal muscle status who were at risk for poor survival could have a clinical benefit by interventions for sarcopenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia is known to bring about adverse outcomes in elderly populations and dialysis patients. However, whether it is a risk factor in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) has not yet been established. In the present study, the association of sarcopenia with mortality was investigated in KTRs.

Methods: We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study and recruited KTRs who were more than 1-year posttransplant from August 2017 to January 2018. The participants were followed for 5 years, and the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess patient survival.

Results: A total of 212 KTRs with a median age of 54 years and median transplant vintage of 79 months were enrolled in this study. Among them, 33 (16%) had sarcopenia according to the Asia Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 at baseline. During the 5-year follow-up period, 20 (9.4%) died, 5 returned to dialysis after graft loss, and 4 were lost to follow-up. The 5-year overall survival rate was 90%. After 1:1 propensity score matching, a matched cohort with 60 KTRs was generated. The overall survival rate was significantly lower in the sarcopenia group compared to the non-sarcopenia group (p = 0.025, log-rank test). Furthermore, mortality risk was significantly higher in the sarcopenia group compared to the non-sarcopenia group (hazard ratio = 7.57, 95% confidence interval = 0.94-62).

Conclusion: Sarcopenia was a predictor of mortality in KTRs. KTRs with suboptimal muscle status who were at risk for poor survival could have a clinical benefit by interventions for sarcopenia.

作为肾移植受者死亡率预测因素的 "肌肉疏松症":一项为期 5 年的前瞻性队列研究与倾向得分匹配。
背景:众所周知,肌肉疏松症会给老年人群和透析患者带来不良后果。然而,它是否是肾移植受者(KTRs)的一个风险因素尚未确定。本研究调查了肌肉疏松症与肾移植受者死亡率的关系:我们开展了一项单中心前瞻性队列研究,从 2017 年 8 月至 2018 年 1 月招募了移植后超过 1 年的 KTR。对参与者进行了为期5年的随访,并采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例危险模型评估患者的生存情况:本研究共纳入212名KTR患者,中位年龄为54岁,中位移植年限为79个月。其中,33 人(16%)在基线时根据亚洲肌少症工作组 2019 年的标准患有肌少症。在 5 年的随访期间,20 人(9.4%)死亡,5 人在移植物丢失后重返透析,4 人失去随访。5年总存活率为90%。经过 1:1 倾向评分匹配后,产生了一个包含 60 名 KTR 的匹配队列。与非肌肉疏松症组相比,肌肉疏松症组的总存活率明显较低(p = 0.025,log-rank 检验)。此外,与非肌少症组相比,肌少症组的死亡风险明显更高(危险比 = 7.57,95% 置信区间 = 0.94-62):肌少症是预测 KTR 死亡率的一个因素。结论:肌肉疏松症是预测 KTR 死亡率的一个因素,对肌肉状况欠佳且有生存风险的 KTR 患者进行肌肉疏松症干预,可为其带来临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信