Firearm businesses as partners in suicide prevention: a cross-sectional study of the Gun Shop Project in Colorado, USA.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Erin Wright-Kelly, Jessica Theresa Buck-Atkinson, Marian E Betz, Kate Little, Jani S Little, Beverly E Kingston, Eric Sigel, Sabrina Arredondo-Mattson
{"title":"Firearm businesses as partners in suicide prevention: a cross-sectional study of the Gun Shop Project in Colorado, USA.","authors":"Erin Wright-Kelly, Jessica Theresa Buck-Atkinson, Marian E Betz, Kate Little, Jani S Little, Beverly E Kingston, Eric Sigel, Sabrina Arredondo-Mattson","doi":"10.1136/ip-2023-045178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Gun Shop Project aims to reduce firearm suicide and is widely implemented in the USA, yet little is known about the core firearm business practices and behaviours that might contribute to preventing firearm suicide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Owners or managers of all firearm businesses identified as participants in Colorado's Gun Shop Project were invited to respond to a questionnaire. Data collection occurred from March to May 2021. Analyses included unweighted descriptive statistics with CIs and Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> tests for categorical associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>54 firearm businesses participated (response rate: 28%). Under half reported practices that are Gun Shop Project core aspects (range: 14%-45%). 22% of businesses frequently engaged customers on the importance of safe firearm storage in suicide prevention while 26% had denied a firearm sale and 14% had assisted with temporary secure storage in the past year with customers perceived to be in suicidal crisis. However, high proportions reported willingness to engage in these behaviours if a customer was in crisis: 74% were willing to refuse a sale of a firearm or ammunition, 70% were willing to discuss temporary secure storage options and 70% were willing to direct customers to mental health services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that efforts to continue educating and involving firearm businesses may have an impact on the adoption of organisational suicide prevention practices and behaviours. Ongoing efforts are needed to understand core components of Gun Shop Project to inform standardised recommendations for effective firearm business practices that prevent firearm suicide.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2023-045178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Gun Shop Project aims to reduce firearm suicide and is widely implemented in the USA, yet little is known about the core firearm business practices and behaviours that might contribute to preventing firearm suicide.

Methods: Owners or managers of all firearm businesses identified as participants in Colorado's Gun Shop Project were invited to respond to a questionnaire. Data collection occurred from March to May 2021. Analyses included unweighted descriptive statistics with CIs and Pearson χ2 tests for categorical associations.

Results: 54 firearm businesses participated (response rate: 28%). Under half reported practices that are Gun Shop Project core aspects (range: 14%-45%). 22% of businesses frequently engaged customers on the importance of safe firearm storage in suicide prevention while 26% had denied a firearm sale and 14% had assisted with temporary secure storage in the past year with customers perceived to be in suicidal crisis. However, high proportions reported willingness to engage in these behaviours if a customer was in crisis: 74% were willing to refuse a sale of a firearm or ammunition, 70% were willing to discuss temporary secure storage options and 70% were willing to direct customers to mental health services.

Conclusions: This study suggests that efforts to continue educating and involving firearm businesses may have an impact on the adoption of organisational suicide prevention practices and behaviours. Ongoing efforts are needed to understand core components of Gun Shop Project to inform standardised recommendations for effective firearm business practices that prevent firearm suicide.

作为预防自杀合作伙伴的枪支企业:对美国科罗拉多州枪支商店项目的横断面研究。
背景:枪支商店项目旨在减少枪支自杀,并在美国广泛实施,但人们对可能有助于防止枪支自杀的核心枪支业务实践和行为却知之甚少:方法:邀请科罗拉多州枪支商店项目中所有被确认为参与者的枪支企业的所有者或管理者回答调查问卷。数据收集时间为 2021 年 3 月至 5 月。分析包括非加权描述性统计和 CIs,以及分类关联的 Pearson χ2 检验:共有 54 家枪支企业参与(响应率:28%)。不到一半的企业报告了枪支店项目核心方面的做法(范围:14%-45%)。22% 的企业经常向客户宣传安全存放枪支对预防自杀的重要性,而 26% 的企业在过去一年中曾拒绝出售枪支,14% 的企业曾协助处于自杀危机中的客户临时安全存放枪支。然而,有很高比例的人表示,如果顾客处于危机之中,他们愿意采取这些行为:74%的人愿意拒绝出售枪支或弹药,70%的人愿意讨论临时安全存储方案,70%的人愿意引导顾客接受心理健康服务:这项研究表明,继续对枪支企业进行教育并让其参与进来,可能会对企业采取预防自杀的做法和行为产生影响。需要继续努力了解枪支商店项目的核心内容,以便为预防枪支自杀的有效枪支商业实践提供标准化建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Injury Prevention
Injury Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信