The impact of long-term (≥5 years) cholecystectomy on gut microbiota changes and its influence on colorectal cancer risk: based on 16S rDNA sequencing analysis.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000002827
Xiecheng Zhou, Liang Xu, Qixing Zhang, Wenqi Chen, Hongwei Xie
{"title":"The impact of long-term (≥5 years) cholecystectomy on gut microbiota changes and its influence on colorectal cancer risk: based on 16S rDNA sequencing analysis.","authors":"Xiecheng Zhou, Liang Xu, Qixing Zhang, Wenqi Chen, Hongwei Xie","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000002827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to be a major global health concern. Recent advances in molecular biology have highlighted the gut microbiota's role in CRC. This study investigates long-term (≥5 years) gut microbiota changes in patients postcholecystectomy, comparing them with CRC patients and healthy controls to assess their impact on CRC development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty participants were divided into three groups: 20 healthy controls, 20 postcholecystectomy (PCE) patients, and 20 CRC patients. Demographic data and stool samples were collected. Gut microbiota composition, abundance, and diversity were analyzed using high-throughput 16S rDNA sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in microbial community, α-diversity ( P  < 0.05) and β-diversity ( P  = 0.006), were observed among the three groups. At the phylum level, Firmicutes abundance was significantly reduced in PCE and CRC groups compared with the control group ( P  = 0.002), while changes in other phyla were not significant ( P >0.05). At the genus level, Bacteroides , Dialister , and Parabacteroides increased progressively from control to PCE to CRC groups ( P  = 0.004, 0.001, and 0.002). Prevotella decreased across these groups ( P  = 0.041). Faecalibacterium and Roseburia abundances were reduced in PCE and CRC groups compared with controls ( P  = 0.001 and 0.003). The Random Forest algorithm identified Parabacteroides , Bacteroides , Roseburia , and Dialister as key distinguishing genera.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The gut microbiota of long-term (≥5 years) PCE patients significantly differs from that of controls and resembles that of CRC patients, suggesting a potential link between cholecystectomy and CRC development through key microbial changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to be a major global health concern. Recent advances in molecular biology have highlighted the gut microbiota's role in CRC. This study investigates long-term (≥5 years) gut microbiota changes in patients postcholecystectomy, comparing them with CRC patients and healthy controls to assess their impact on CRC development.

Methods: Sixty participants were divided into three groups: 20 healthy controls, 20 postcholecystectomy (PCE) patients, and 20 CRC patients. Demographic data and stool samples were collected. Gut microbiota composition, abundance, and diversity were analyzed using high-throughput 16S rDNA sequencing.

Results: Significant differences in microbial community, α-diversity ( P  < 0.05) and β-diversity ( P  = 0.006), were observed among the three groups. At the phylum level, Firmicutes abundance was significantly reduced in PCE and CRC groups compared with the control group ( P  = 0.002), while changes in other phyla were not significant ( P >0.05). At the genus level, Bacteroides , Dialister , and Parabacteroides increased progressively from control to PCE to CRC groups ( P  = 0.004, 0.001, and 0.002). Prevotella decreased across these groups ( P  = 0.041). Faecalibacterium and Roseburia abundances were reduced in PCE and CRC groups compared with controls ( P  = 0.001 and 0.003). The Random Forest algorithm identified Parabacteroides , Bacteroides , Roseburia , and Dialister as key distinguishing genera.

Conclusion: The gut microbiota of long-term (≥5 years) PCE patients significantly differs from that of controls and resembles that of CRC patients, suggesting a potential link between cholecystectomy and CRC development through key microbial changes.

长期(≥5 年)胆囊切除术对肠道微生物群变化的影响及其对结直肠癌风险的影响:基于 16S rDNA 测序分析。
背景:结肠直肠癌(CRC)仍然是全球关注的主要健康问题。分子生物学的最新进展突显了肠道微生物群在 CRC 中的作用。本研究调查了胆囊切除术后患者肠道微生物群的长期(≥5 年)变化,并将其与 CRC 患者和健康对照组进行比较,以评估其对 CRC 发展的影响:将 60 名参与者分为三组:20 名健康对照组、20 名胆囊切除术后(PCE)患者和 20 名 CRC 患者。收集人口统计学数据和粪便样本。利用高通量 16S rDNA 测序分析了肠道微生物群的组成、丰度和多样性:微生物群落、α-多样性存在显著差异(P 0.05)。在属一级,从对照组到 PCE 组再到 CRC 组,Bacteroides、Dialister 和 Parabacteroides 的数量逐渐增加(P = 0.004、0.001 和 0.002)。Prevotella 在这些组别中有所减少(P = 0.041)。与对照组相比,PCE 组和 CRC 组的粪杆菌和 Roseburia 丰度降低(P = 0.001 和 0.003)。随机森林算法确定 Parabacteroides、Bacteroides、Roseburia 和 Dialister 为主要的区分菌属:结论:长期(≥5 年)PCE 患者的肠道微生物群与对照组有显著差异,并与 CRC 患者的肠道微生物群相似,这表明胆囊切除术与 CRC 的发展之间通过关键微生物变化存在潜在联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信