Radiation exposure and screening yield by digital breast tomosynthesis compared to mammography: results of the TOSYMA Trial breast density related.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10847-9
Alexander Sommer, Stefanie Weigel, Hans-Werner Hense, Joachim Gerß, Veronika Weyer-Elberich, Laura Kerschke, Elke Nekolla, Horst Lenzen, Walter Heindel
{"title":"Radiation exposure and screening yield by digital breast tomosynthesis compared to mammography: results of the TOSYMA Trial breast density related.","authors":"Alexander Sommer, Stefanie Weigel, Hans-Werner Hense, Joachim Gerß, Veronika Weyer-Elberich, Laura Kerschke, Elke Nekolla, Horst Lenzen, Walter Heindel","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10847-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The randomized TOmosynthesis plus SYnthesized MAmmography (TOSYMA) screening trial has shown that digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesized mammography (DBT + SM) is superior to digital mammography (DM) in invasive breast cancer detection varying with breast density. On the other hand, the overall average glandular dose (AGD) of DBT is higher than that of DM. Comparing the DBT + SM and DM trial arm, we analyzed here the mean AGD and their determinants per breast density category and related them to the respective invasive cancer detection rates (iCDR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TOSYMA screened 99,689 women aged 50 to 69 years. Compression force, resulting breast thickness, the calculated AGD obtained from each mammography device, and previously published iCDR were used for comparisons across breast density categories in the two trial arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 196,622 exposures of 49,227 women (DBT + SM) and 197,037 exposures of 49,132 women (DM) available for analyses. Mean breast thicknesses declined from breast density category A (fatty) to D (extremely dense) in both trial arms. However, while the mean AGD in the DBT + SM arm declined concomitantly from category A (2.41 mGy) to D (1.89 mGy), it remained almost unchanged in the DM arm (1.46 and 1.51 mGy, respectively). In relative terms, the AGD elevation in the DBT + SM arm (64.4% (A), by 44.5% (B), 27.8% (C), and 26.0% (D)) was lowest in dense breasts where, however, the highest iCDR were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with dense breasts may specifically benefit from DBT + SM screening as high cancer detection is achieved with only moderate AGD elevations.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>TOSYMA suggests a favorable constellation for screening with digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesized mammography (DBT + SM) in dense breasts when weighing average glandular dose elevation against raised invasive breast cancer detection rates. There is potential for density-, i.e., risk-adapted population-wide breast cancer screening with DBT + SM.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Breast thickness declines with visually increasing density in digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Average glandular doses of DBT decrease with increasing density; digital mammography shows lower and more constant values. With the smallest average glandular dose difference in dense breasts, DBT plus SM had the highest difference in invasive breast cancer detection rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"166-176"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10847-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The randomized TOmosynthesis plus SYnthesized MAmmography (TOSYMA) screening trial has shown that digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesized mammography (DBT + SM) is superior to digital mammography (DM) in invasive breast cancer detection varying with breast density. On the other hand, the overall average glandular dose (AGD) of DBT is higher than that of DM. Comparing the DBT + SM and DM trial arm, we analyzed here the mean AGD and their determinants per breast density category and related them to the respective invasive cancer detection rates (iCDR).

Methods: TOSYMA screened 99,689 women aged 50 to 69 years. Compression force, resulting breast thickness, the calculated AGD obtained from each mammography device, and previously published iCDR were used for comparisons across breast density categories in the two trial arms.

Results: There were 196,622 exposures of 49,227 women (DBT + SM) and 197,037 exposures of 49,132 women (DM) available for analyses. Mean breast thicknesses declined from breast density category A (fatty) to D (extremely dense) in both trial arms. However, while the mean AGD in the DBT + SM arm declined concomitantly from category A (2.41 mGy) to D (1.89 mGy), it remained almost unchanged in the DM arm (1.46 and 1.51 mGy, respectively). In relative terms, the AGD elevation in the DBT + SM arm (64.4% (A), by 44.5% (B), 27.8% (C), and 26.0% (D)) was lowest in dense breasts where, however, the highest iCDR were observed.

Conclusion: Women with dense breasts may specifically benefit from DBT + SM screening as high cancer detection is achieved with only moderate AGD elevations.

Clinical relevance statement: TOSYMA suggests a favorable constellation for screening with digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesized mammography (DBT + SM) in dense breasts when weighing average glandular dose elevation against raised invasive breast cancer detection rates. There is potential for density-, i.e., risk-adapted population-wide breast cancer screening with DBT + SM.

Key points: Breast thickness declines with visually increasing density in digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Average glandular doses of DBT decrease with increasing density; digital mammography shows lower and more constant values. With the smallest average glandular dose difference in dense breasts, DBT plus SM had the highest difference in invasive breast cancer detection rates.

Abstract Image

与乳腺 X 线照相术相比,数字乳腺断层合成术的辐射量和筛查率:与乳腺密度相关的 TOSYMA 试验结果。
目的:随机乳腺断层合成+合成乳腺X线摄影(TOSYMA)筛查试验表明,数字乳腺断层合成+合成乳腺X线摄影(DBT+SM)在随乳腺密度变化的浸润性乳腺癌检测中优于数字乳腺X线摄影(DM)。另一方面,DBT 的总体平均腺体剂量(AGD)高于 DM。通过比较 DBT + SM 和 DM 试验组,我们分析了每个乳腺密度类别的平均腺体剂量及其决定因素,并将它们与各自的浸润性癌症检出率(iCDR)联系起来:TOSYMA筛查了99689名50至69岁的女性。方法:TOSYMA筛查了99,689名50-69岁的女性,采用了压迫力、由此产生的乳房厚度、每台乳腺X光设备计算出的AGD以及之前公布的iCDR,对两个试验组的不同乳房密度类别进行比较:共有 49,227 名妇女的 196,622 次暴露(DBT + SM)和 49,132 名妇女的 197,037 次暴露(DM)可用于分析。在两个试验组中,平均乳房厚度从乳房密度类别A(脂肪型)下降到D(极致密型)。然而,虽然 DBT + SM 试验组的平均 AGD 从 A 类(2.41 mGy)下降到 D 类(1.89 mGy),但 DM 试验组的平均 AGD 几乎保持不变(分别为 1.46 mGy 和 1.51 mGy)。相对而言,DBT + SM治疗组的AGD升高率(64.4% (A)、44.5% (B)、27.8% (C)和26.0% (D))在致密乳房中最低,而在致密乳房中观察到的iCDR最高:结论:致密乳房妇女可能特别受益于 DBT + SM 筛查,因为只需中度 AGD 升高即可实现高癌症检出率:TOSYMA表明,在权衡平均腺体剂量升高与提高浸润性乳腺癌检出率之间的关系时,数字乳腺断层合成+合成乳腺X线摄影(DBT+SM)筛查对致密乳房是有利的。利用DBT+SM技术,有可能对高密度人群进行风险适应性乳腺癌筛查:要点:在数字乳腺 X 射线照相术(DM)和数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)中,乳房厚度随着视觉密度的增加而减少。DBT 的平均腺体剂量会随着密度的增加而减少;数字乳腺 X 光摄影显示出更低且更稳定的值。致密乳房的平均腺体剂量差异最小,DBT 加 SM 在浸润性乳腺癌检出率方面的差异最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信