Mentalizing deficits in borderline personality disorder related to axis I comorbidity: Clinical relevance.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Early Intervention in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1111/eip.13593
José Manuel López-Villatoro, M Díaz-Marsá, A Gálvez-Merlin, P De la Higuera-González, J L Carrasco
{"title":"Mentalizing deficits in borderline personality disorder related to axis I comorbidity: Clinical relevance.","authors":"José Manuel López-Villatoro, M Díaz-Marsá, A Gálvez-Merlin, P De la Higuera-González, J L Carrasco","doi":"10.1111/eip.13593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Deficits in mentalization have been described in several mental disorders, but information is still scarce and ambiguous about the types of mentalization errors in each disorder and their specificity and severity in borderline personality disorder (BPD). Due to the high comorbidity between this disorder and axis I disorders, the aim of this work is to study differences in mentalization responses in BPD considering the different comorbidity profiles with other disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 141 BPD patients were evaluated using The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), to identify comorbid axis I disorders. Mentalizing ability was assessed by the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC). Statistical associations were analysed into the different variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with comorbid BPD and anorexia nervosa (AN), suicidal behaviour disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) respectively presented higher overmentalization, undermentalization and absence of mentalization errors, compared with patients with BPD without comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results show that BPD comorbidity with AN, suicidal behaviour disorder and PTSD affect to the types and severity of mentalizing deficits observed in these patients. This study highlights the importance of the assessment and treatment of axis I comorbid disorders in borderline personality disorder, with the objective of shaping personalized treatment for every patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e13593"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13593","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Deficits in mentalization have been described in several mental disorders, but information is still scarce and ambiguous about the types of mentalization errors in each disorder and their specificity and severity in borderline personality disorder (BPD). Due to the high comorbidity between this disorder and axis I disorders, the aim of this work is to study differences in mentalization responses in BPD considering the different comorbidity profiles with other disorders.

Methods: A total of 141 BPD patients were evaluated using The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), to identify comorbid axis I disorders. Mentalizing ability was assessed by the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC). Statistical associations were analysed into the different variables.

Results: Patients with comorbid BPD and anorexia nervosa (AN), suicidal behaviour disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) respectively presented higher overmentalization, undermentalization and absence of mentalization errors, compared with patients with BPD without comorbidity.

Conclusions: Results show that BPD comorbidity with AN, suicidal behaviour disorder and PTSD affect to the types and severity of mentalizing deficits observed in these patients. This study highlights the importance of the assessment and treatment of axis I comorbid disorders in borderline personality disorder, with the objective of shaping personalized treatment for every patient.

边缘型人格障碍的心智缺陷与第一轴合并症有关:临床相关性。
目的:心理化缺陷已在多种精神障碍中得到描述,但关于每种精神障碍中心理化错误的类型及其在边缘型人格障碍(BPD)中的特异性和严重性的信息仍然很少且不明确。由于边缘型人格障碍与第一轴心障碍高度共病,本研究旨在考虑到边缘型人格障碍与其他障碍的不同共病特征,研究边缘型人格障碍的心智化反应差异:方法:使用迷你国际神经精神访谈(MINI)对 141 名 BPD 患者进行评估,以确定是否合并 I 轴障碍。思维能力通过社会认知评估模型(MASC)进行评估。对不同变量进行了统计关联分析:结果:与无合并症的 BPD 患者相比,合并有 BPD 和神经性厌食症(AN)、自杀行为障碍或创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的患者分别表现出更高的过度心智化、心智化不足和无心智化错误:研究结果表明,BPD 与自闭症、自杀行为障碍和创伤后应激障碍的合并症会影响这些患者心智缺陷的类型和严重程度。这项研究强调了评估和治疗边缘型人格障碍第一轴合并症的重要性,目的是为每位患者提供个性化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信